Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Info on Early 80s Mustang?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Info on Early 80s Mustang?

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
Datim View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: August-04-2007
Status: Offline
Points: 39
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Datim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Info on Early 80s Mustang?
    Posted: August-04-2007 at 1:20pm
Does anyone out there have any experience with an 80s CC Mustang. I'm looking at an 83 Mustang, that's in good condition with 680 hours and around $3500 which is pretty much around what I can afford right now for a wake boat. Been riding behind a friend's 15 foot outboard and we are looking to get something cheap that we can take care of and that has a decent wake.

I'm just wondering what kind of wake an 83 Mustang would puts out. Any info from someone who has any knowledge or experience with one of these (or an earlier model that has a similar hull) and knows what kind of wake they produce both weighted and unweighted, would be appreciated. Thanks
Back to Top
nautique frk View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: February-16-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nautique frk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-04-2007 at 1:53pm
They brought back the Mustang for 1982 and 1983.
Check it out in the reference section.
Submit some pictures of the boat you are looking at !!

Good luck !!
Mike (Nautique Frk )
Back to Top
ultrahots View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: September-08-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 618
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ultrahots Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-04-2007 at 4:52pm
I think as the Tique took over the Nautique size in 82 and 83 @18 foot and the Mustang was simply a Renamed Tique as it was a 16 footer
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21185
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-06-2007 at 2:07pm
Originally posted by ultrahots ultrahots wrote:

I think as the Tique took over the Nautique size in 82 and 83 @18 foot and the Mustang was simply a Renamed Tique as it was a 16 footer


I think thats correct. The '83 Mustang was the 16'5" hull, which dates back to the '71 Mustang. That hull was also used on the Skier (later renamed Ski Tique) in the 70's.
Back to Top
69 Mustang View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: April-26-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 402
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 69 Mustang Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-07-2007 at 1:50am
So my 78 SkiTique is both an 83 Mustang and a 71 Mustang? If I average out the years, I end up with a 77. This could be true based on my reading that many boats were built in one calendar year and have a HIN for the year of sale...

If you plan on using it mostly for boarding, get a Flitepipe, not a tower.
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

"Where the **** are we?" Amelia Earhart. July 2, 1937
Back to Top
MaddMarxx View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1741
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MaddMarxx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-07-2007 at 4:02am
I think "Tim" is right about that, I was looking to buy one, it was an 82 and it was the same size as my nautique but it had a (302) in it!
Back to Top
Datim View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: August-04-2007
Status: Offline
Points: 39
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Datim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-07-2007 at 11:18am
Very interesting. I did check up on the reference page and I'm pretty sure it's a 1983 Mustang. it's indeed 16.5 feet long. Here are some pictures.


I can't test drive the boat since it's about 7 hours away, so I'm looking for some info on the kind of wake that it throws before I commit to going to see it. It is decent at all? How does it compare to say a SN2001? That would be my ideal boat, but it's pretty hard to get one in my price range these days.

Anyway, any info on the wake, size characteristics, comparisons to the SN2001, would be appreciated.

BTW, why would it be best to put a skylon on it rather than a tower? Other than preserving the vintage look, is there another reason?
Back to Top
79Tique View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September-04-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 380
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 79Tique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-07-2007 at 3:09pm
My 79 Ski Tique throws what I would call a good wake with about 200 to 250 lbs of weight added. I think you would get a little better wake out of a 2001, but you probably won't get one of those for the cash you are talking about.

That Mustang looks nice I think I would go for it. My family and I have been very happy with the Tique. I think the only negative of that 16.5 hull is a lack of space for more than four people to hang out. The Mustang/Tique will make a better wake than the out board and the speed control should be a lot better.

If it's running good the two mods I would make right away are a extended pylon and a Acme 542 prop. Other than that you should be ready to ride! If you won't have more than two or three folks in the boat you may want to add a sack for weight as well.
Work to live, not live to work.

Back to Top
64 Skier View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: February-08-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 64 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2007 at 3:47pm
The 16' model is a little narrow for wakeboarding and on a strong pullout, the boat leans over and loses some wake height. Add a Tower and it's a significant lean and you have to constantly steer the boat away from the boarder during the pullout (reduces the lean and tracks straighter) and then steer into him while he's gliding in order to restore the wake. If you don't steer my boat like this then you have no pop. So if your planning on adding a Tower then I suggest you look at a larger boat.


However, at 36 mph the boat runs straight thru the slalom course even with very strong skiers trying to pull you offcourse. I love the slalom wake behind the 16' boat since it feels like one bump versus two bumps from the newer boats. Slightly harder bump behind the 16' but you get over it after a while.

64 Skier
66" HO VTX and 67" HO Triumph
71CC
Back to Top
Datim View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: August-04-2007
Status: Offline
Points: 39
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Datim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-09-2007 at 10:25pm
Thanks, sure appreciate all the info. I'm not sure what I'm going to do. I'm really only going to use the boat for wakeboarding, but it's about the only thing that I can find within my price range. I'm sure it'll be better than the 15 foot outboard that I ride behind right now. Decisions, decisions. ha!
Back to Top
Datim View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: August-04-2007
Status: Offline
Points: 39
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Datim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-10-2007 at 5:42am
Good news. I found a SN2001 for $3500 in working condition. Interior needs work, but stringers and floor solid and engine running. The front seal on the transmission does need to be replaced as it's leaking, but other than that, it's good to go. BTW, which transmission would a SN2001 have? PCM 1:1 (Power Plus) or Borg Warner 1:1 (Velvet Drive)?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC