Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fuel Efficiency Question
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Fuel Efficiency Question

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
samudj01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: March-10-2009
Location: NC
Status: Offline
Points: 931
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote samudj01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Fuel Efficiency Question
    Posted: July-21-2013 at 11:51pm
While I don't think any of these boats are exactly fuel efficient, which engines in the 97-02 range were most fuel efficient? I always read great things about the GT-40's on other threads. Thanks, David
78 Ski Tique, 72 Skier w/302's, 93 SN w/351 & 17 GS22 w/zr409
Previous - 99 Sport Nautique w/GT40 and 87 Martinique w/351
Back to Top
cooperlacy View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2009
Location: Cutler, IN
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cooperlacy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-22-2013 at 12:25am
My boat is just slightly out of your date range (1995 Ski), but has the GT-40 engine. I have kept pretty detailed logs on fuel usage since 2010. The boat runs 90% slalom between 32 to 36 mph, 5% barefoot runs, and very infrequently a joyride. Very rarely is the boat just idling for any period of time.

With that in mind, here are my numbers (approx. 50 hours per year). I'd be curious to see what others are getting.
2010: 3.89 gph
2011: 4.37 gph
2012: 5.16 gph (one faulty spark plug most of the year)
2013: 4.47 gph

Cooper
Back to Top
samudj01 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: March-10-2009
Location: NC
Status: Offline
Points: 931
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote samudj01 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 12:41am
No one else is willing to weigh in on this? Would love some feed back. Maybe I should rephrase my question...what engines are the worst on fuel efficiency in the 98-01 time period. Or does bigger = less efficient?
78 Ski Tique, 72 Skier w/302's, 93 SN w/351 & 17 GS22 w/zr409
Previous - 99 Sport Nautique w/GT40 and 87 Martinique w/351
Back to Top
gun-driver View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-18-2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 4112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gun-driver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 12:44am
I have a '95 ski with the GT-40 EFI and I have noticed that when the little pointy thingy points to E, I fill it up and smile ear to ear again.
Back to Top
phatsat67 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: March-13-2006
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 6147
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote phatsat67 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 12:47am
Haha I like your fuel usage Paul.

It seems to me like my dad's 98 uses less fuel than my 86 when you are beating it to death but I haven't calculated either.
Back to Top
SNobsessed View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: October-21-2007
Location: IA
Status: Offline
Points: 7102
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SNobsessed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 12:50am
When you add up all that goes into boat ownership, the fuel cost is a minor item.
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

Ben Franklin
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 1:54am
We spent more at the Goose and Nortons than I did for gas last weekend
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4231
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 12:31pm
I have no idea on gph on my boat. As mentioned above, when the gauge gets low I add more.

Not to be flip about it, but I just don't care. For a ski boat, I would never choose the engine based on efficiency, just whether it's a good fit for the boat and my use.

As far as I know, the 351's will all burn about the same amount under the same load at same rpm. Carbed, injected, not sure there is a major difference in fuel burn.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
panda View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October-14-2009
Location: Central IL
Status: Offline
Points: 215
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote panda Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 3:07pm
Never calculated my fuel consumption, but cooperlacy's sounds pretty accurate to my 95's GPH.



95 Ski Nautique GT40
Back to Top
quinner View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-12-2005
Location: Unknown
Status: Offline
Points: 5828
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote quinner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 3:13pm
Not that easy to answer because everybody's use may vary.
Fuel Injected EI motors will be more efficient than Carb EI
If you are primarily running heavy loads or barefooting a Big Block could be more economical.
The year range noted won't have many motor choices, most common will be small block efi (GT-40/Apex/Excalibur) the Big Block Python was available but pretty rare and the carb'd motor was a Pro Ski IIRC.
Back to Top
peter1234 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-03-2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2756
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peter1234 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 9:08pm
i was amazed (thread jack non cc) bought a carbed 454 25 ft formula and have used it 4 times some full throttle some cruising and lots of no wake and have used $170 or so in fuel with the fun its been i would have paid 400.00   just find the boat you love and enjoy it
former skylark owner now a formula but I cant let this place go
Back to Top
74Wind View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: August-02-2011
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
Points: 2101
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 74Wind Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 9:11pm
Seems the 351 in my SW is more efficient than the 360 in my Century but that may be a function of use...the Mark II is a little hot-rod and just begs to be driven as such. Anyone know any gph figures for 70's era engines?

Fuel cost is also an overall use figure. I calculated the to and fro fuel cost for a tow vehicle would exceed my monthly rack storage bill. Plus, it's hassle-free, and everytime I arrive at the lake to see it sitting at the dock, all ready to go,I'm like a little kid on Christmas morning
1974 Southwind 18
1975 Century Mark II
Back to Top
75 animal View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December-01-2011
Location: australia
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 75 animal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 9:48pm
4-4.5 gallons per hour for my snob 99 with gt 40. Average crew of 4 men all around 90 kilograms. Half the time footing and the other half free-skiing.sorry about the kilograms, but that's how we measure it in Australia !
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4231
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 10:13pm
Originally posted by peter1234 peter1234 wrote:

i was amazed (thread jack non cc) bought a carbed 454 25 ft formula and have used it 4 times some full throttle some cruising and lots of no wake and have used $170 or so in fuel with the fun its been i would have paid 400.00   just find the boat you love and enjoy it

Peter, mechanical or vacuum secondaries? Sounds like a fun boat! I drove behind a newer Formula today on the highway, beautiful boat, looked to be about 35 ft.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
peter1234 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-03-2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2756
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peter1234 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-29-2013 at 11:03pm
david , quadrajet carb , and pre fastech hull design but it sure is comfortable so far going in and out of newburyport harbor which as you probably know doesnt need explaining. it doesnt run as fast as i expected , and need to check out the prop pitch on it . it does run 1:100 but i expect 55 at 4800 with the bb chev. i will hope to move to a 37ft fastec in a couple of yrs.
former skylark owner now a formula but I cant let this place go
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4231
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-30-2013 at 12:30am
I meant the Formula I saw looked to be 25 ft., not 35, can't see well enough on my phone!

Curious what you find with your prop. I wouldn't have thought a stock 454 would get a 25 ft. Formula up to 55, I believe that's a fairly heavy boat. As you know better than me, more HP is pretty easy to find on a 454! I'm beginning to catch the bug to do some salt water boating, I'm about an hour from the coast so well within easy trailer range.

'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
peter1234 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-03-2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2756
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peter1234 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-30-2013 at 10:01am
Im hoping it was repropped for the winnipesaukee speed limit by the previous owner . It is beautiful off shore on a smooth sunny morning for sure.
former skylark owner now a formula but I cant let this place go
Back to Top
Uncle Donny View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: July-29-2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Uncle Donny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-01-2013 at 4:24pm
ummmm... when it's empty, I fill it back up http://www.correctcraftfan.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC