Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1.23:1 vs 1:1, performance, interchangeability?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

1.23:1 vs 1:1, performance, interchangeability?

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
1xsculler View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: July-02-2016
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 1xsculler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 1.23:1 vs 1:1, performance, interchangeability?
    Posted: July-22-2016 at 5:05am
Why the two gearboxes? Is there an advantage or a performance difference?
The engine seems to sit higher and be at more of an angle in th 1:1 set up. Is the prop shaft angle different and are the two set ups interchangeable one boat to another?
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-22-2016 at 10:51am
Assuming your talking a Warner 1:1 compared to a PCM 1.23:1. There were several advantages listed at the time in the 89 brochure. I think the biggest one is that it allowed PCM to use standard rotation engines to turn right handed props since the trans was able to do the direction change as opposed to the Warner that always turns the same direction out as what goes in. The output on a PCM is down angled which does allow the engine to sit at a lower angle. They are interchangeable in the respect they use the same bolt pattern,but the PCM one is longer. It also uses more aluminum in its construction vs cast iron of the other.
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC