Snob vs Sport |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
Nautiquehunter
Platinum Member Joined: December-31-2008 Location: Lake Lanier GA Status: Offline Points: 1010 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: November-18-2017 at 9:50am |
|
What is the difference between say a 95 Sport Nautique and a 95 Ski Nautique open bow?
Is it the same hull? Can I expect the same ski wake? |
||
Orlando76
Grand Poobah Joined: May-21-2013 Location: Mount Dora, FL Status: Offline Points: 3108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Different hulls. SNOB is still a CB Ski but slightly forward cockpit. Sport is entirely different longer Hull. If skiing is your choice then I’d stick with the Ski.
|
||
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort 1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM |
||
Donald80SN
Grand Poobah Joined: January-12-2009 Location: Denver, NC Status: Offline Points: 3887 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mike,
The Sport Hull will be 20' 2" or so. That is what my 2002 Sport measures. The SNOB will be somewhere around 19' 6" . Quinner says 8" makes a big difference. Donald |
||
1980 Ski Nautique SOLD Back to Cypress Gardens
2002 Sport Nautique, GT-40, FCT2, Cover Sports, Tower Bimini, Inc., Wet Sounds Audio System, Star Gazer Wake Edition S. 1968 Ski Nautique, Project. |
||
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In that particular year, Sport is 225lbs heavier and 1.5 feet longer than SNOB. No, you could not expect the same wake.
If I recall, your situation is that you already own a wake/surf boat, and a couple of Supra ski boats. The plan is to sell the Supras and buy your wife a Ski Nautique. If that is still the plan, I don't think you should look at anything older than a 97 SN. In my opinion, for Correct Craft boats before 97, the ski wake will not be any better than the ski wake on your Supras, and, in some cases, maybe worse. My unsolicited $.02. BKH |
||
Livin' the Dream
|
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If 8” makes a big difference, then the 10” your sport is missing may be a concern. All sports 93-2002 list at 21’ per the brochures (1.5’ difference like BKH said). I recall the TS6M being a pretty decent slalom boat, on par with the NWZ (90-96 SN). Agree that stepping up to a TSC or better SN will be needed to get better than that. Sports, 206 and 216 are all a step in the wrong direction. |
||
Nautiquehunter
Platinum Member Joined: December-31-2008 Location: Lake Lanier GA Status: Offline Points: 1010 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Here is the bottom line as some of you know I have a weakness for old Supras . I have a 84 and a 92 Comp that put out a pretty good wake . The thing I don't like is the closed bow . So I was going to sell both and look for a 99-2000 Supra Legacy [ comp with an open bow] that was the plan until the wife skied a 2003 196. She liked the wake even better than the 92 comp . So I can get the open bow that I like or the wake that she likes. So it looks like the Hunters will be a two Nautique and one Supra family come spring. I am just checking what years will be identical wake wise to the 2003 196.
|
||
NCH20SKIER
Grand Poobah Joined: December-16-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I had a ‘96 Sport and the best thing about it was....the GT 40 and the cover I had made for it. It had a lousy slalom wake and was worse for footing.
I have a 206 (pre- hydrogate) and do not consider the slalom wake that bad - it is not a CB but still not bad. Unless your in the curl or on a 100’ rope the table is not foot friendly. Your welcome to come give it a ride anytime |
||
'05 206 Limited
'88 BFN |
||
Orlando76
Grand Poobah Joined: May-21-2013 Location: Mount Dora, FL Status: Offline Points: 3108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Although I LOVE my NWZ, it has a soft but tall wake at my wimpy-22@ 32mph. I’d bet taller than it’s competition of the era.
|
||
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort 1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
‘03 196 = TSC2 (02-05). TSC3 (06-09) is essentially equivalent with the added ability to tune the trick wake with the hydrogate. TSC (97-01) will be very close to as good as the TSC2/3, but not quite as good.
|
||
Morfoot
Grand Poobah Joined: February-06-2004 Location: South Lanier Status: Offline Points: 5311 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mike... you've already got two open bows with both brands and the pontoon for those times when you wanna grill out on the water. A closed bow Nautique ain't gonna kill you and we both know ( as well as most of us who know Gail) that she is a Slalom skier by nature and so are most of us who come hang out with you for weekends at a time so go with a 196. That way I can enjoy skiing behind it as much as Gail....I mean I already have my own room at the Hunter Hotel so adding a 196 to the mix would just make it much much nicer!
|
||
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
|
||
Nautiquehunter
Platinum Member Joined: December-31-2008 Location: Lake Lanier GA Status: Offline Points: 1010 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks Benj that is exactly what I was looking for.
|
||
jimsport93
Platinum Member Joined: February-20-2008 Location: Alpharetta Ga Status: Offline Points: 1749 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
There is a '99 Sport for sale in Dallas, Tx for $6,500
Needs some Hunter style TLC Might work! |
||
Donald80SN
Grand Poobah Joined: January-12-2009 Location: Denver, NC Status: Offline Points: 3887 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Tim is correct . I did a bad job of proof reading. My intent was to type that my boat is 21' 2" not the 20' 2" that I typed. This is according to the 2002 Sport Brochure in the reference section (Blue Boat). When compared to a 19' 6" Ski Nautique, the Sport is a longer boat. |
||
1980 Ski Nautique SOLD Back to Cypress Gardens
2002 Sport Nautique, GT-40, FCT2, Cover Sports, Tower Bimini, Inc., Wet Sounds Audio System, Star Gazer Wake Edition S. 1968 Ski Nautique, Project. |
||
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Although there are hardcore slalom peeps who argue that the 97-01 is "better." I'm not really sure how one defines better between those three designs. Probably because I'm not good enough to know. BKH |
||
Livin' the Dream
|
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have heard that and just don’t understand it... the tsc2/3 does an incrementally better job at knocking down/un-defining the rooster tail, so it should be better at the lengths/speeds where the rooster is a factor. Otherwise they are pretty darn similar, both are great. I still think the NWZ is a very good slalom boat (though not as good as TSCx) so what do I know.
|
||
63 Skier
Grand Poobah Joined: October-06-2006 Location: Concord, NH Status: Offline Points: 4232 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As the years roll forward and the deals on TSC2 boats get better and better, I'd recommend you go there. I notice the TSC2 being better than a TSC, and if I notice then a good slalom skier will REALLY notice. 196 is an awesome slalom boat.
|
||
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
|
||
Nautiquehunter
Platinum Member Joined: December-31-2008 Location: Lake Lanier GA Status: Offline Points: 1010 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It looks like I should concentrate my search on a TSC2 or maybe a TSC1 if I come across the right one. I don't think I can afford a TSC3 unless I find one needing repairs or a smoking hot deal.
|
||
Donald80SN
Grand Poobah Joined: January-12-2009 Location: Denver, NC Status: Offline Points: 3887 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mike,
There seems to be a large price difference when you move up to the years with Drive By Wire / Zero Off. The boats without Drive By Wire command less money. The hard core skiers want the Zero Off Speed Control. Some folks are pulling perfectly good drive by cable engines and repowering with newer drive by wire systems for Zero Off. You can add a Z-Box to Star Gazer by Perfect Pass to get a similar feel as Zero Off. Typically, you will need this or Zero Off only if you compete in the course or pull friends that compete. Depending on how long you are going to be keeping the boat, having drive by wire will effect the resell in a good way. If you do not need Zero Off, you can find some smoking deals on Drive by Cable. The hardcore skier pass them by sometimes. I hope this helps, Donald . |
||
1980 Ski Nautique SOLD Back to Cypress Gardens
2002 Sport Nautique, GT-40, FCT2, Cover Sports, Tower Bimini, Inc., Wet Sounds Audio System, Star Gazer Wake Edition S. 1968 Ski Nautique, Project. |
||
Riley
Grand Poobah Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7946 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If your wife liked the 2003 196 enough to want to get one, that's what I'd be looking for. We skied a '98 SN 2 years ago, and I thought the wake was really nice at 32 mph, but my wife found the bump in the rooster tail unbearable at 28-29 mph.. We ski at 15 off.
|
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not sure that adds up, as 15off at 28-29mph is well behind the rooster tail. It’s a factor at the 22-28off, 32-34mph range.
|
||
Riley
Grand Poobah Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7946 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Adds up? It is a fact in the boat we were in. I'm just glad I didn't trade our present ski boat for the '98 figuring I'd surprise my wife with a new boat. We had to add 15' of rope for Nancy which she didn't care for either, (who does when your used to 15 off?).
|
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Someone has to be mistaken, as the rooster tail converges closer than 60’ from the boat at that speed on that hull, yes. I’ll send you a pic.
Maybe she didn’t like the wake or you accidentally shortened the rope? |
||
Riley
Grand Poobah Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7946 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I believe the crew in the boat suggested lengthening the line because she was skiing through sh*t, but I will defer to my first sentence in my 1st post of this thread.
|
||
Orlando76
Grand Poobah Joined: May-21-2013 Location: Mount Dora, FL Status: Offline Points: 3108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I will have to pretty much agree with Bruce on this. My old partners 01/gt40 Id clip the rooster at -15@29-30 and at -22@30&32 I was right in the rooster. Although fabulous wake I find the rooster on a TSC to be a small hard curb. My 93 at those lengths and speed is bigger but way softer. I’ll lose my man card but the Carbon Pro for those stats is far superior.
|
||
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort 1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM |
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |