Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Snob vs Sport
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Snob vs Sport

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
Nautiquehunter View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-31-2008
Location: Lake Lanier GA
Status: Offline
Points: 1010
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautiquehunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Snob vs Sport
    Posted: November-18-2017 at 9:50am
What is the difference between say a 95 Sport Nautique and a 95 Ski Nautique open bow?
Is it the same hull? Can I expect the same ski wake?
Back to Top
Orlando76 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: May-21-2013
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 3108
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Orlando76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 9:57am
Different hulls. SNOB is still a CB Ski but slightly forward cockpit. Sport is entirely different longer Hull. If skiing is your choice then I’d stick with the Ski.
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort
1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM
Back to Top
Donald80SN View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: January-12-2009
Location: Denver, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 3887
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald80SN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 1:49pm
Mike,

The Sport Hull will be 20' 2" or so. That is what my 2002 Sport measures. The SNOB will be somewhere around 19' 6" . Quinner says 8" makes a big difference.

Donald
1980 Ski Nautique SOLD Back to Cypress Gardens
2002 Sport Nautique, GT-40, FCT2, Cover Sports, Tower Bimini, Inc., Wet Sounds Audio System, Star Gazer Wake Edition S.
1968 Ski Nautique, Project.
Back to Top
bkhallpass View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: March-29-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4723
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bkhallpass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 1:59pm
In that particular year, Sport is 225lbs heavier and 1.5 feet longer than SNOB. No, you could not expect the same wake.

If I recall, your situation is that you already own a wake/surf boat, and a couple of Supra ski boats. The plan is to sell the Supras and buy your wife a Ski Nautique. If that is still the plan, I don't think you should look at anything older than a 97 SN.   In my opinion, for Correct Craft boats before 97, the ski wake will not be any better than the ski wake on your Supras, and, in some cases, maybe worse.

My unsolicited $.02.

BKH
Livin' the Dream

Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 2:56pm
Originally posted by Donald80SN Donald80SN wrote:


The Sport Hull will be 20' 2" or so. That is what my 2002 Sport measures. Quinner says 8" makes a big difference.

If 8” makes a big difference, then the 10” your sport is missing may be a concern. All sports 93-2002 list at 21’ per the brochures (1.5’ difference like BKH said).

I recall the TS6M being a pretty decent slalom boat, on par with the NWZ (90-96 SN). Agree that stepping up to a TSC or better SN will be needed to get better than that. Sports, 206 and 216 are all a step in the wrong direction.
Back to Top
Nautiquehunter View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-31-2008
Location: Lake Lanier GA
Status: Offline
Points: 1010
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautiquehunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 8:07pm
Here is the bottom line as some of you know I have a weakness for old Supras . I have a 84 and a 92 Comp that put out a pretty good wake . The thing I don't like is the closed bow . So I was going to sell both and look for a 99-2000 Supra Legacy [ comp with an open bow] that was the plan until the wife skied a 2003   196. She liked the wake even better than the 92 comp . So I can get the open bow that I like or the wake that she likes. So it looks like the Hunters will be a two Nautique and one Supra family come spring. I am just checking what years will be identical wake wise to the 2003 196.
Back to Top
NCH20SKIER View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: December-16-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2205
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NCH20SKIER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 8:18pm
I had a ‘96 Sport and the best thing about it was....the GT 40 and the cover I had made for it. It had a lousy slalom wake and was worse for footing.
I have a 206 (pre- hydrogate) and do not consider the slalom wake that bad - it is not a CB but still not bad. Unless your in the curl or on a 100’ rope the table is not foot friendly.
Your welcome to come give it a ride anytime
'05 206 Limited
'88 BFN
Back to Top
Orlando76 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: May-21-2013
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 3108
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Orlando76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2017 at 10:36pm
Although I LOVE my NWZ, it has a soft but tall wake at my wimpy-22@ 32mph. I’d bet taller than it’s competition of the era.
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort
1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 9:32am
‘03 196 = TSC2 (02-05). TSC3 (06-09) is essentially equivalent with the added ability to tune the trick wake with the hydrogate. TSC (97-01) will be very close to as good as the TSC2/3, but not quite as good.
Back to Top
Morfoot View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-06-2004
Location: South Lanier
Status: Offline
Points: 5311
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Morfoot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 10:49am
Mike... you've already got two open bows with both brands and the pontoon for those times when you wanna grill out on the water. A closed bow Nautique ain't gonna kill you and we both know ( as well as most of us who know Gail) that she is a Slalom skier by nature and so are most of us who come hang out with you for weekends at a time so go with a 196. That way I can enjoy skiing behind it as much as Gail....I mean I already have my own room at the Hunter Hotel so adding a 196 to the mix would just make it much much nicer!
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
Back to Top
Nautiquehunter View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-31-2008
Location: Lake Lanier GA
Status: Offline
Points: 1010
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautiquehunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 12:20pm
Thanks Benj that is exactly what I was looking for.
Back to Top
jimsport93 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: February-20-2008
Location: Alpharetta Ga
Status: Offline
Points: 1749
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimsport93 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 12:22pm
There is a '99 Sport for sale in Dallas, Tx for $6,500
Needs some Hunter style TLC
Might work!
Back to Top
Donald80SN View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: January-12-2009
Location: Denver, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 3887
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald80SN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 1:06pm
Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:

Originally posted by Donald80SN Donald80SN wrote:


The Sport Hull will be 20' 2" or so. That is what my 2002 Sport measures. Quinner says 8" makes a big difference.

If 8” makes a big difference, then the 10” your sport is missing may be a concern. All sports 93-2002 list at 21’ per the brochures (1.5’ difference like BKH said).

I recall the TS6M being a pretty decent slalom boat, on par with the NWZ (90-96 SN). Agree that stepping up to a TSC or better SN will be needed to get better than that. Sports, 206 and 216 are all a step in the wrong direction.


Tim is correct . I did a bad job of proof reading.

My intent was to type that my boat is 21' 2" not the 20' 2" that I typed. This is according to the 2002 Sport Brochure in the reference section (Blue Boat). When compared to a 19' 6" Ski Nautique, the Sport is a longer boat.
1980 Ski Nautique SOLD Back to Cypress Gardens
2002 Sport Nautique, GT-40, FCT2, Cover Sports, Tower Bimini, Inc., Wet Sounds Audio System, Star Gazer Wake Edition S.
1968 Ski Nautique, Project.
Back to Top
bkhallpass View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: March-29-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4723
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bkhallpass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 2:13pm
Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:

‘03 196 = TSC2 (02-05). TSC3 (06-09) is essentially equivalent with the added ability to tune the trick wake with the hydrogate. TSC (97-01) will be very close to as good as the TSC2/3, but not quite as good.


Although there are hardcore slalom peeps who argue that the 97-01 is "better." I'm not
really sure how one defines better between those three designs. Probably because I'm not good enough to know.

BKH
Livin' the Dream

Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 3:11pm
I have heard that and just don’t understand it... the tsc2/3 does an incrementally better job at knocking down/un-defining the rooster tail, so it should be better at the lengths/speeds where the rooster is a factor. Otherwise they are pretty darn similar, both are great. I still think the NWZ is a very good slalom boat (though not as good as TSCx) so what do I know.
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2017 at 8:55pm
As the years roll forward and the deals on TSC2 boats get better and better, I'd recommend you go there. I notice the TSC2 being better than a TSC, and if I notice then a good slalom skier will REALLY notice. 196 is an awesome slalom boat.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
Nautiquehunter View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-31-2008
Location: Lake Lanier GA
Status: Offline
Points: 1010
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautiquehunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-20-2017 at 9:48am
It looks like I should concentrate my search on a TSC2 or maybe a TSC1 if I come across the right one. I don't think I can afford a TSC3 unless I find one needing repairs or a smoking hot deal.
Back to Top
Donald80SN View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: January-12-2009
Location: Denver, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 3887
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald80SN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 11:03am
Mike,

There seems to be a large price difference when you move up to the years with Drive By Wire / Zero Off. The boats without Drive By Wire command less money. The hard core skiers want the Zero Off Speed Control. Some folks are pulling perfectly good drive by cable engines and repowering with newer drive by wire systems for Zero Off.

You can add a Z-Box to Star Gazer by Perfect Pass to get a similar feel as Zero Off. Typically, you will need this or Zero Off only if you compete in the course or pull friends that compete. Depending on how long you are going to be keeping the boat, having drive by wire will effect the resell in a good way.   

If you do not need Zero Off, you can find some smoking deals on Drive by Cable. The hardcore skier pass them by sometimes.

I hope this helps,

Donald .
1980 Ski Nautique SOLD Back to Cypress Gardens
2002 Sport Nautique, GT-40, FCT2, Cover Sports, Tower Bimini, Inc., Wet Sounds Audio System, Star Gazer Wake Edition S.
1968 Ski Nautique, Project.
Back to Top
Riley View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-19-2004
Location: Portland, ME
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Riley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 11:22am
If your wife liked the 2003 196 enough to want to get one, that's what I'd be looking for. We skied a '98 SN 2 years ago, and I thought the wake was really nice at 32 mph, but my wife found the bump in the rooster tail unbearable at 28-29 mph.. We ski at 15 off.
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 11:37am
Not sure that adds up, as 15off at 28-29mph is well behind the rooster tail. It’s a factor at the 22-28off, 32-34mph range.
Back to Top
Riley View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-19-2004
Location: Portland, ME
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Riley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 11:45am
Adds up? It is a fact in the boat we were in. I'm just glad I didn't trade our present ski boat for the '98 figuring I'd surprise my wife with a new boat. We had to add 15' of rope for Nancy which she didn't care for either, (who does when your used to 15 off?).
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 12:29pm
Someone has to be mistaken, as the rooster tail converges closer than 60’ from the boat at that speed on that hull, yes. I’ll send you a pic.

Maybe she didn’t like the wake or you accidentally shortened the rope?
Back to Top
Riley View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-19-2004
Location: Portland, ME
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Riley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 12:41pm
I believe the crew in the boat suggested lengthening the line because she was skiing through sh*t, but I will defer to my first sentence in my 1st post of this thread.
Back to Top
Orlando76 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: May-21-2013
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 3108
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Orlando76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-21-2017 at 6:06pm
I will have to pretty much agree with Bruce on this. My old partners 01/gt40 Id clip the rooster at -15@29-30 and at -22@30&32 I was right in the rooster. Although fabulous wake I find the rooster on a TSC to be a small hard curb. My 93 at those lengths and speed is bigger but way softer. I’ll lose my man card but the Carbon Pro for those stats is far superior.
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort
1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC