Ignition Timing & Altitude |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Jonny Quest
Grand Poobah Joined: August-20-2013 Location: Utah--via Texas Status: Offline Points: 2858 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: August-30-2019 at 4:24pm |
We've all heard various "rules of thumb" when it comes to tweaking engine performance. I live and ski between 4,400 and 6,500 feet of elevation. So far, my only altitude tweak is on my QF M-650 carby where the primary and secondary jets are leaned-out 2 sizes. Now I'm considering a tweak to the ignition timing on my DUI dizzy set-up.
I've heard one old rule-of-thumb for timing and elevation that says "1/2 degre timing advance for every 1,000 feet of elevation". So, my Pro Boss (PLP) engine specs show ignition timing at idle of 10 degrees BTDC. PCM manual shows 8.3:1 compression ratio. I run 89 octane fuel. What do you gents think of increasing ignition timing to 12 degrees at idle? Maybe a bit more? JQ |
|
Current
2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited Previous 2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow 1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow Aqua skiing, ergo sum |
|
KENO
Grand Poobah Joined: June-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10667 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's pretty easy to find thumb rules that say 1 degree per 1000 ft also.
If you go to 12 you should have 36 total 14 would be 38 total assuming the DUI has 24 degrees of mechanical advance as it was sent to you I guess it all depends on how close to the ragged edge you want to be at higher rpm's There must be some reason why you want to jack it up I say ............go for it 2 degrees at a time, remembering that too much initial makes for a looong slooow crank that'll make you think your battery is dead. 12 initial 36 total should be no problem at all especially since you need less octane at higher altitudes. Lots of people run numbers like that at sea level with 89 octane Do some reading on detonation symptoms first Don't they sell 85 octane moose whiz out there in the mountains? |
|
Jonny Quest
Grand Poobah Joined: August-20-2013 Location: Utah--via Texas Status: Offline Points: 2858 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Just trying to squeeze a bit more performance out of the engine. 4,400 feet of elevation is a 15% reduction in barometric pressure. At 6,000 feet, that loss increases to a 20% reduction. Loss of ambient air pressure = a reduction in the engine's volumetric efficiency. Tweaking the ignition timing to properly compensate for the elevation is a relatively easy fix. The next step is to cut a hole in the top of the engine cover and mount a blower. OK, maybe not that... JQ |
|
Current
2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited Previous 2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow 1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow Aqua skiing, ergo sum |
|
gt40KS
Gold Member Joined: August-05-2017 Location: Wichita Kansas Status: Offline Points: 943 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I believe I've got the answer to your loss of air pressure JQ ....
That oughta do it |
|
JCCI
1995 Ski Nautique GT40 |
|
Jonny Quest
Grand Poobah Joined: August-20-2013 Location: Utah--via Texas Status: Offline Points: 2858 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Definitely gonna have to cut a hole in the engine cover. The real question, however, is RR or standard rotation? JQ |
|
Current
2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited Previous 2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow 1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow Aqua skiing, ergo sum |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |