Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - TS6M question
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

TS6M question

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
john b View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-06-2011
Location: lake Sweeny
Status: Offline
Points: 3236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote john b Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: TS6M question
    Posted: August-07-2016 at 11:06pm
Sorry if this is not permitted, I'm just looking for some input from real skiers, not hacks like me who would be thrilled with a tiller steered Bass Tracker.
Is anyone willing to give an assesment of a PCM Supra TS6M of about 92 vintage?
I am not bailing out of the Mustang project, just wonder what the strengths / weaknesses are vs a SN or Mustang.
Several extremely nice 80s SNs have shown up on my chain recently, both are red and very sharp. I seldom see Supras and wonder why.
1970 Mustang "Theseus' paradox"
If everyone else is doing it, you're too late!

Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 12:15am
Probably a locality thing... No local supra dealer during the 80's and 90's?

They're not super common here but a friend of ours had 2 TS6m's ('87 &'92) and they were good ski boats. Very swoopy/California look to them. Fairly small wake for slalom and nice barefoot table as I recall (at least compared to our '92 SN). They didn't drive like CC's and weren't especially fast... Can't comment on build quality as I never dug in. Interior was a little cramped- even an early 2001 seems roomier I'd say. Late 2001 and NWZ+ seems much bigger inside.

Certainly a much more viable ski boat than a 60-70's era CC... But it all depends on what you're looking for.

Larry 75tique had one for many years.
Back to Top
fanofccfan View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-13-2009
Location: North Bend NE
Status: Offline
Points: 1722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fanofccfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 12:26am
Barefoot wake is non existent on the one I skied. Top end lacks a little. I would imagine slalom wake would be good as well. My friend just moved up to a 200o Malibu. He is not so sure he made the correct move as far as the wake is concerned. He had 1500 hours on it and things were starting to fall apart but it always gave us a good tow. Knowing all that I would still buy the 92 vintage correct craft. Much more solid build.
Back to Top
Poorhouse View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: November-11-2013
Location: Whitefish, MT
Status: Offline
Points: 187
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Poorhouse Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 12:30am
I'm a hack, a newby hack at that so take this for what it's worth.

Our ski friend is about 40 and a life long skier. She grew up skiing behind a 79 Nautique. She and her skier husband bought a boat a few years ago, a 93 Supra Comp. I asked her how long they planned to keep it a few weeks ago. She said it was a forever boat for them. Best wake they had experienced as skiers. They looked a long time for a nice composite stringer Comp and paid a premium for it.


edited for spelling - fat fingers don't work well on a phone.
Sold - 1986 Supra Sunsport Skier
Current - 1996 - MC Prostar 205
I keep doing this wrong.
Back to Top
john b View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-06-2011
Location: lake Sweeny
Status: Offline
Points: 3236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote john b Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 12:40am
Thanks. I have skied the Supra, but I haven't skied enough inboards, nor am I good enough to have an opinion. How about an old 16' Mustang? I know it will work for me, but can a really good skier enjoy it? Barefoot behind it? Is it good at anything?
1970 Mustang "Theseus' paradox"
If everyone else is doing it, you're too late!

Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 8:16am
Originally posted by john b john b wrote:

Thanks. I have skied the Supra, but I haven't skied enough inboards, nor am I good enough to have an opinion. How about an old 16' Mustang? I know it will work for me, but can a really good skier enjoy it? Barefoot behind it? Is it good at anything?

It depends what "enjoy" means! I skied for years behind my 16' CC, American Skier, same hull as the 16' Mustang. I certainly enjoyed it. But after now a lot of years of skiing behind modern slalom boats I doubt I'd enjoy more than a nostalgic run behind it.

Specifically, the wakes are steep and sharp. Boat can be yanked around by a strong slalom skier. The contrast of those boats to anything from 2001 models and up is pretty dramatic, especially NWZ forward.

Can't comment on barefoot. Yes, the boats are good for something, they are a blast to drive, sound great, you have something very few people have.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
75 Tique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: August-12-2004
Location: Seven Lakes, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6097
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 75 Tique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 12:41pm
I owned an 89 Supra. Very nice boat. Style was way ahead of 89 SN, I think. Fit and finish, very nice. Good materials, stood up well.

Nice slalom wake, comparable or better than a 2001. Only problem was a fairly significant rooster tail at 22. Before and after that was fine. Maybe that could have been tuned down with the cavitation plate or a different prop, I never messed with it, since I was not a 22 off course skier.

Mine got a little sluggish in its later years (bought in 96, sold it in 06) Maybe it could have been brought back to life with some changes, but it was about a 40 mph boat at that point, so not great for footing but certainly doable.   Not sure how much better is was earlier on, but I seem to recall it being better.

Same drive train as the 89 SN, so no comparisons to be made there. (240 HP, PCM 1.23:1)

_____________
“So, how was your weekend?”
“Well, let me see…sun burn, stiff neck, screwed up back, assorted aches and pains….yup, my weekend was great, thanks for asking.”
Back to Top
Morfoot View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-06-2004
Location: South Lanier
Status: Offline
Points: 5311
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Morfoot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 1:33pm
I own a 88' SN and a 72' Mustang... I like skiing behind both boats and consider myself a fair skier. The Mustang will do fine pulling slalom and I myself enjoy skiing behind mine as often as I can. Its a great pull and as long as your cutting through the wakes you won't have a problem. The looks you get from other boaters is pretty cool too as it's not often they see a slalom skier these days and when it's behind a classic ski boat it's even cooler!
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21109
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 1:47pm
I would mostly agree with 63's comments above. The older boats are still ski boats and will pull like tractors. They have center mounted pylons and big V8's, so they'll pull every discipline without breaking a sweat- including barefooting. I don't recall if I've pulled 3 or more footers on any of my 16 footers... But I've done 2 plenty of times.

The older boats with their narrow beams and large wakes also make for fun trick skiing boats. Where they fall down in terms of skiing performance is slalom- wake size and shape is less than awesome, as is the tracking and spray. The 2001 was really the first "modern" cc ski boat, the NWZ was the first great cc slalom boat. The supra is comparable to the latter, from a skiing perspective, IMHO. The TSC+ ski nautiques are better- that is what my friend upgraded to after owning 2 Ts6m's. Any 2001+ SN will drive much better than the Supra, IMHO.
Back to Top
MrMcD View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-28-2014
Location: Folsom, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3590
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrMcD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 3:24pm
My brother owned a Supra Ts6m, I do all of his maintenance and repairs and we ski and boat together often. I found the boat well built. I liked the way it turned and liked the ride.   Interior was nice and the hardware in most cases was high quality.   The negative was the engine had to work harder to go the same speed as my Nautique or my Malibu.   I think the Supra hull has more drag.
It ran about 4 mph slower than the Malibu with the same prop and similar power.
I worked on the tune, checked compression and it was not an engine issue.   I never weighed it but maybe they are heavier?
Good boat, these are minor differences pointed out.
At 15 off it had a great ski wake.
Back to Top
75 Tique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: August-12-2004
Location: Seven Lakes, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 6097
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 75 Tique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-08-2016 at 3:49pm
Building on Mark's comments, I think it is a slower hull. I was going to say for two reasons. One, it has a very deep stem/bow that about amidships turns back up to the flat portion of the back half of the hull. Supra touted that feature as making for a smoother ride than other, flatter ski boats. My second reason is not true. I was going to say the Supra is likely heavier than a 2001 because the hull cap had inside walls. See the picture of Okie Boarders cap when he split his to redo it. But I am wrong. I looked up the weights of both the supra and the 2001 and they are both 2350 pounds.   That surprised me.

_____________
“So, how was your weekend?”
“Well, let me see…sun burn, stiff neck, screwed up back, assorted aches and pains….yup, my weekend was great, thanks for asking.”
Back to Top
john b View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-06-2011
Location: lake Sweeny
Status: Offline
Points: 3236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote john b Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-09-2016 at 5:20pm
Going to pick this one up tomorrow in Springfield IL and drag it up to the WI northwoods. My brother has made me it's caretaker until I finish the Mustang. He is way to kind. I know we will enjoy it. My wife is afraid it's a distraction and will result in the Mustang being put on hold even longer. I have assured her this is not the case. Next summer for sure.


1970 Mustang "Theseus' paradox"
If everyone else is doing it, you're too late!

Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4232
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-09-2016 at 6:48pm
Congrats John! Now you'll find out the difference between the boats through firsthand use.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
john b View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-06-2011
Location: lake Sweeny
Status: Offline
Points: 3236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote john b Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-09-2016 at 7:23pm
Originally posted by 63 Skier 63 Skier wrote:

Congrats John! Now you'll find out the difference between the boats through firsthand use.

I have driven this TS6M quite a bit and skied it a little over the years. I know very little about the CCs though. I was asking about it to get a comparison and know what to expect out of the mustang. It sounds like the Lil Mustang will do everything I need but nothing particularly well. From the description of the Mustang wake my boarding friends may even have a bit of fun behind it. Just getting excited about diving into the project as soon as the boats go into hibernation.
1970 Mustang "Theseus' paradox"
If everyone else is doing it, you're too late!

Back to Top
Orlando76 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: May-21-2013
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 3108
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Orlando76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-16-2016 at 10:43pm
I just watched some videos of a ~88 ts6m. As I figured the wake is superior to an NWZ. Tracking, construction etc probably subpar to any SN.
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort
1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM
Back to Top
MrMcD View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-28-2014
Location: Folsom, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3590
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrMcD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-17-2016 at 12:49am
We skied a Supra TS6M many times, my brothers boat. Skied it hard. It tracked better than my 78 Nautique or my 87 Malibu Skier.   The 95 I now have feels superior in both steering and track.
The Supra seems heavy in the water, maybe by design to stay planted on hard pulls?
It did turn quite well, far better than my Malibu, which I have not missed at all since selling.
The Malibu had an awesome straight ahead ski wake. It's ability to turn was sub par.
Back to Top
AAM196 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: October-23-2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AAM196 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-25-2016 at 11:45pm
Originally posted by john b john b wrote:

My wife is afraid it's a distraction and will result in the Mustang being put on hold even longer.


I think the opposite will happen if you are like 95% of the members of this site. The more you are out on the water and see the old boats out... the more it will inspire you to get the mustang done! I have a 99 so it really isn't that new but I always jump in the 83 MC and run up the lake when Dad has it at lake... I am only 41 but takes me back. At least twice a week, someone always asks if they can buy it... (kind of annoying as it is not being advertised lol) but hey.

There is a Supra dealer on the lake (since before I can remember) so there are quite a few around. Good boat and the comp is great to ski behind (no better than a NWZ though) never drove one but have skied one in late 80s. I think you will like it.
Back to Top
john b View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-06-2011
Location: lake Sweeny
Status: Offline
Points: 3236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote john b Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-26-2016 at 3:08am
Originally posted by AAM196 AAM196 wrote:

Originally posted by john b john b wrote:

My wife is afraid it's a distraction and will result in the Mustang being put on hold even longer.


I think the opposite will happen if you are like 95% of the members of this site. The more you are out on the water and see the old boats out... the more it will inspire you to get the mustang done! I have a 99 so it really isn't that new but I always jump in the 83 MC and run up the lake when Dad has it at lake... I am only 41 but takes me back. At least twice a week, someone always asks if they can buy it... (kind of annoying as it is not being advertised lol) but hey.

There is a Supra dealer on the lake (since before I can remember) so there are quite a few around. Good boat and the comp is great to ski behind (no better than a NWZ though) never drove one but have skied one in late 80s. I think you will like it.


Thanks a lot Andrew,
The Supra is a distraction and I am not the owner, only the guardian. Overall it is in very good condition and came to me with only 433 hours on the clock. I am addressing a few issues on it, and it will take some time away from other projects.
The Mustang is my priority and dream. I really like the Supra, as does my daughter, but you are right, it reinforced my classic boat love. The Mustang, despite all it's shortcomings, is what I really want as my toy. I will have access to the Supra for an undetermined length of time but I dnt anticipate using it much. Maybe I will get a pull behind it before the water gets hard. I think Barney is a good name for it for obvious reasons. Here are a few photos that remind me I could be enjoying summer in the Mustang.
1970 Mustang "Theseus' paradox"
If everyone else is doing it, you're too late!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC