Where is the tea party?

In Boston??

At work!

My theory on this election cycle is that the democrats are helping Romney win the nomination. Why? Because he is the canidate they feel they can beat in a general election. They are scared of Gingrich, Sanatorum is too politically inexpeirienced to carry through to nomination. They are giving Ron Paul enough support to break away and split the independent/republican vot assuring an Obama win.

They are manipulating the mainstreem media and scoring the primaries before they happpen guiding the course of results.

When Gingrich stays focused his knowledge and ability to think on the spot and answer any qustion propel him ahead. When conered and attacked he goes wild and gets careless which is scarey to many.

Romney and Paul have some big money giving them large support teams which keep them a threat.

The policies and flips of Romney along with different statistic every time he speaks are his downfall.

Ron Paul (who wasn't allowed to debate last cycle) has some off beat foreign policies that are unacceptable.

Add to this the democrats, playing race card, manipulating and distortiing Obama's record to a positive flavor,and ommitting anything that could harm him are going to make this a tough election.

you cant see through a stained glass window....

to rich and to good lookin......he runs around with rich friends that also take advanatge of our tax codes....and they aint gonna change the codes














________________________________
Cheap WOW Gold | Runescape Money
Buy Runescape Gold | WOW Gold

maybe Obama is the answer?

OverMyHead wrote: ononewheel wrote: They were bought and paid for like any interest group. It was never about changing the system, it was a gimic and a ploy to regain power. Gingrich is running away with the GOP nomination??? Yet, the tea party faithful and all those other republicans will support him. Who bought and paid for the Tea Party? I know I did not get my check. For a guy who has gone to great lengths trying to break the stereotypes associated with the occupy movement you are quick to label the Tea Party. The republican establishment has little love for the Tea Party. The right does not have a billionaire crook like George Sorros to fund the tea party, it is truly a grass roots group with little to no leadership. On that topic, how come we never hear about George when you bring up the "rich". He is evil, and destroys people and countries for his own enrichment. He is the biggest example of someone funding a movement and using its participants for personal gain. Oh yea, he advises Barrack, including meeting with him right before the US poured millions into Brazil's oil drilling industry, an industry George is a big investor in.

Dave,

It is what it is. A gimic and a ploy. There isn't a check, well not for you anyway. And I just don't see how you can say the "establishment" has no love for the tea party, sympathy is borderline "love".   How many tea party juniors were elected, and now on the way out? I can think of 16 right now, and there job was just to get elected, sympathize, and vote the "right" way. Tools really.

So where are they? How could it just disappear as quick as it rolled in? Good question, and I think you may just have your answer if you would just look.     

You can compare it to OWS. And maybe you are spot on it might be too early to tell.   I can compare our situation to Chile, Argentina, and even the UK, and while the Tea party was simaler to the Junta, OWS is would be the opposite of the Tea Party, by definition. I have said it before, the Tea party, on the lower levels was stumping against the best interest of themselves and the country.

As far a Soros, if you are right about him, why is it we do not hear about him? Likely answer will be something to do with the "vast left wing media", which I cannot even begin to understand. Soros, in my opinion should be subject to the exact same regulations as the rest of us, including Norquest.

Dave,

Since you are a tea party member, then you should be able to see the correlation to the early days of the tea party and the OWS movement.