Oil drain bolt

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   1968 Interceptor was a 289ci. It was offered in 4 horsepower versions: 165/190/200/210. I think the thread size is 1/2" X 20. I have the 165HP version in my 1969 Mustang.

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
1969cc Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Groupie Joined: February-22-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 84	Post Options Post Reply Quote 1969cc Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: Oil drain bolt Posted: March-06-2005 at 11:18pm
	1968 Interceptor was a 289ci. It was offered in 4 horsepower versions: 165/190/200/210. I think the thread size is 1/2" X 20. I have the 165HP version in my 1969 Mustang.

Tim D Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Grand Poobah Joined: August-23-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2641	Post Options Post Reply Quote Tim D Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: March-03-2005 at 3:35pm
	The bell housing is the way to tell if it's a 260. Everything else is the same between the 260,289, and the 302 as far as bolt-on. The intake, heads, timing gear cover, oil pan all interchange except the bell housing. The 260 has a smaller bell housing and smaller bolt pattern.
	Tim D

Jim_In_Houston Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Visit Members Homepage Add to Buddy List Platinum Member Joined: September-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1120	Post Options Post Reply Quote Jim_In_Houston Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: March-03-2005 at 12:52pm
	The only thing I have to go on is that the previous owner told me it was a "200 HP" engine. I have been assuming it was a 289. There is a number cast onto the block under the starter that indicates which block you have but I cannot see mine without pulling my starter. I am in the process of replacing the heads with a GT-40P set I just purchased. When I remove the old heads I will be able to measure the bore and I will know for sure. My engine has no Horsepower decal on it. As far as 45 more HP, I have to agree with you. Those ratings should be taken with a grain of salt. Horsepower ratings are somewhat subjective. Manufacturers can be liberal, in either direction, when rating the horsepower output of equipment. Sometimes horsepower ratings are assigned for marketing purposes. It could be your 260 was rated on the low side while the 289s are rated on the high side. Who would pay a lot more for just a couple of additional HP? I remember back in the 60s - I had a friend with a 260 in a small Ford. It ran very strong! The 260 is no slouch. So, the answer is: who knows?
	Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang

64 Skier Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Senior Member Joined: February-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 415	Post Options Post Reply Quote 64 Skier Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: March-03-2005 at 4:35am
	My '64 had an engine that was built in '63 which was confirmed by running down the numbers. I thought it was a 260, but turned out to be a 289 with a solid lifter cam...that was a surprise. The Oil pan integrally mounts the engine and is aluminum. Can't help you with the bolt size...I'm not at home with the boat!
	64 Skier 66" HO VTX and 67" HO Triumph 71CC

68 Mustang Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: February-16-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 25	Post Options Post Reply Quote 68 Mustang Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: March-03-2005 at 2:07am
	I'm not positive but my source is the 68 sales brochure. It gave two options for the motor 165hp and 210hp. Mine has a old but orginal silver and black sticker that has 165hp on it. I alway thought the boat had a 302 in it but the low hp made me wonder. Then I found this sight and was looking at the 66 price list and the mustang came with two motor options 170cu in @100hp and the 260cu in. @165hp. So my guess is that my interceptor is the 260cu in. model being the 165hp match up.I would like to think it is bigger but it is what it is. What is your source for the 289 size. I would think it would have a little more hp than the 165 I have. Is that the 210hp offered in the 68 sale brochure.That also seems high for only 24 more cu in. to get 45 more hp.
	68 Mustang

Jim_In_Houston Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Visit Members Homepage Add to Buddy List Platinum Member Joined: September-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1120	Post Options Post Reply Quote Jim_In_Houston Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: March-02-2005 at 9:43pm
	Hey 68. A little departure from your question but I have to ask: Are you sure your '68 has a 260? My understanding is that CC went to a 289 in 1968. That probably has no bearng on your drain plug size however. If you are sure you have a 260, how do you know? Now I have to worry as to whether or not I have a 260 or a 289. Disettling.
	Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang

68 Mustang Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: February-16-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 25	Post Options Post Reply Quote 68 Mustang Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: March-02-2005 at 9:11pm
	Does any body know what size the oil drain bolt on my 68 260 ford is. I would like to replace it with one that has a drain hoes tapped in it. It would be nice to put the hose threw the drain in the bottom of the boat and catch the oil from under the boat. I bought one from Overtrons years ago but it was the wrong size. Thanks
	68 Mustang

Oil drain bolt

About CCF

Donate

Partners

Contact