Boats For Sale:
New propeller |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
hyper1685 
Groupie 
Joined: September-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 57 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: New propellerPosted: March-25-2005 at 12:58pm |
|
Brian,
All I can say is WOW! The 540 is awesome. the boat is smooth through the entire RPM range, it feel like it has 30 more HP out of the hole, and the top speed went up to about 45 MPH from 43. Great product. i recomend to anyone who still has the original prop, and does skiing, begining wakeboarding, tubing, etc. Now, I off to Miami for spring break. Chris |
|
 |
|
|
plattebum2001
Newbie 
Joined: December-18-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 12 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-25-2005 at 2:37am |
|
I have an 85 2001 351 stock with 700 hours. Last summer I put on a 542 Acme. I pull my son and all of his teenage friends around. They love the new prop for the wake. I love it because it takes less energy from the boat to get out of the water and less rpm to go 18-23 mph. I really noticed the way the prop took the vibration out of the hull at about 35-40 mph. Just one reminder, when you let off the gas hold on because the larger surface area stops you on a dime.
|
|
|
|
|
new86owner
Groupie
Joined: August-02-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-23-2005 at 2:34pm |
|
Go for the 542! It will help maintain constant speed with the lower speeds when wakeboarding.
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
Groupie
Joined: June-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 72 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-22-2005 at 9:35pm |
|
Chris,
Let me know how the 540 works out. I have an 86 as well. Sounds like I should go with the Acme, now I have to decide on the 540 vs 542. I ski, but I am not an expert. We use the boat for tubing, skiing, cruising, wake boarding, and a great seat at the dock to have a cocktail! I am looking for the all around versatile prop. Should I be concerned about over revving with the 542? |
|
|
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
hyper1685
Groupie
Joined: September-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 57 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-22-2005 at 8:08pm |
|
i got my ACME 540 today. its going on the boat on thursday!!!!! i hope it performs as well as everyone says.
chris |
|
|
|
|
1time17
Groupie
Joined: July-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-22-2005 at 2:59am |
|
i called acme this morning and thet sugessted for my 84 2001 the 542 come in on thursday cant wait
|
|
|
gotta love those old school nautiques
custom2001 |
|
|
|
|
new86owner
Groupie
Joined: August-02-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-21-2005 at 12:57pm |
|
The ACME 542 is better for wakeboarding/ wakesurfing. I love mine! Get the 540 if you only use it for skiing.
|
|
|
|
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah 
Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-21-2005 at 10:12am |
|
The ACME 540 is the way to go as a stock replacement and will perform better than the OJ, michigan wheel, or cutter props of equall size.
|
|
|
|
|
882001
Senior Member 
Joined: October-21-2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 332 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-20-2005 at 3:43am |
|
keith did a product test on the acme 540 the link is http://www.correctcraftfan.com/articles/ACME_540_Prop.asp
i have the 542{wakeboard prop} and it is night and day from the crappy factory prop. |
|
|
kemah texas
1988 skinautique "2001" |
|
|
|
|
Brian
Groupie
Joined: June-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 72 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-19-2005 at 11:27pm |
|
Thanks for the info.
The boat currently has a 3 blade 13 x 13. I purchased this boat over the winter to replace my 1982 SN with the same motor. To my knowlege there is no difference in the hull or powertrain between the 82 and the 86. My 82 had a 13 x 13 which offered great performance, no complaints. A local marina suggested I stay with the 3 blade versus the four blade based on my use of the boat. He suggested an OJ 3 blade as a great upgrade to the michigan wheel. |
|
|
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
mrese
Groupie
Joined: February-18-2004 Location: Al Status: Offline Points: 93 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-19-2005 at 6:38pm |
|
I'm not exactly sure what year they switched tranny's from the 1;1 to the 1.23:1
1989 |
|
|
|
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah
Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-19-2005 at 2:04pm |
|
I'm not exactly sure what year they switched tranny's from the 1;1 to the 1.23:1 but if you have the 1:1 velvet drive I would suggest the ACME 540 prop. Their are several choices if you have the gear-reduction tranny so I would compare what the prop actually is now that you took off and then look at what rpm it was turning and correct for it as needed. for instance you where turning 5000 rpm fully loaded but need to be at 4500 rpm range so you would increase the pitch, dia or cup or a companation of each to decrease by 500-600 rpm.
I going to get an ACME 612 for mine but I have a pretty stout motor and turn close to 6000rpm now and want to be at 5000rpm fully loaded and 5500rpm when I'm by myself. Currently I have a 13 x 13 with .080" cup and the 612 is a 12.5 x 15.25 with .105" cup. the cheapist place Iv'e found for the ACME props is at this website http://www.propellersonline.com/Acme3bl.php |
|
|
|
|
Brian
Groupie
Joined: June-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 72 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March-18-2005 at 11:42pm |
|
Well, in preparation for summer I took my spare prop in to be repaired and balanced. This is the first time I have had this prop rebuilt (the spare was used and came with the boat). The repair shop pointed out that this had been rebuilt at least three times and had lost 1/2" of diameter during those rebuilds. He suggested this prop was a little tired and I may want to rethink investing $150.00 in repairs to get it back to the correct diamater.
I agreed. Time to buy a new one! I have a 1986 SN with a PCM351. It is used for recreational skiing, tubing, cruising, and fun. No where even close to competitive skiing. Any suggestions on choosing a 3 or 4 blade prop? I don't mind spending the extra money for the four blade if I will see better performance from an already awesome performing boat. Any advise from some one with a mid 80's nautique would be appreciated. |
|
|
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options