Fat Sacs, Good or Bad |
Post Reply |
Author | |
mdvalant
Grand Poobah Joined: May-06-2009 Location: Bellevue, IA Status: Offline Points: 2059 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: February-14-2011 at 12:52pm |
I run a single 750# in the back of the 90 ski for boarding. I like about 24mph with it and it works well for me. No lip or curl with the setup for me.
|
|
Luchog
Grand Poobah Joined: April-17-2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 2135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Round sacks roll, I can tell you from experience!!!
|
|
wakeboardin2k4
Platinum Member Joined: December-14-2006 Location: Hopatcong, NJ Status: Offline Points: 1117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I love that part, it's one of the few times I can tell a woman to MOVE NOW, and not get in trouble for being a d!ck about it |
|
"I'm planning to bring my girl that rides on a trailer with me and leave my girl that complains about camping at home"
|
|
SNobsessed
Grand Poobah Joined: October-21-2007 Location: IA Status: Offline Points: 7102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Luciano - I think 22MPH was around 2400-2500 RPM.
Doug - We don't have any weight up front other than the anchors & misc gear. The fat sacks are along side the motor box, so there is opportunity to place them more forward or aft. My son (whom all of this wake stuff is about anyways) will direct who he wants to sit where - sometimes insulting a female! Our fat sacks are square, but I wouldn't think that even round ones would 'roll' - they squish out sideways against the gunnel & motor box. |
|
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”
Ben Franklin |
|
Bama Nautique
Senior Member Joined: February-26-2010 Location: Tuscaloosa, Ala Status: Offline Points: 153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Snobs... I am about to purchase a new prop for my 89SN2001. Glad to hear you are having good luck with the 1442. I will solicit info from this site in a month or so when I get closer to buying one. I also just bought two sacs at 350 lbs each. I thought they were fly High but instead are "Launch Pads by Straightline". They are round tubular shaped and I will have to figure out how to place them so they will not roll around on turns. Do you have any ballast in the front of the boat or is all of it in the back...? I read something a while back about ratio between front and back but dont remember where I read it. Thx |
|
Luchog
Grand Poobah Joined: April-17-2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 2135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Snobs, can you recall the rpms at 22mph with the loaded boat?
thank you for the info. |
|
SNobsessed
Grand Poobah Joined: October-21-2007 Location: IA Status: Offline Points: 7102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Luciano - We have 4 persons, about 600# total. I estimate we put about that much weight in the fat sacks too. I would guess 200# more for gear. Have no idea how much soaked foam I have. The 1442 works great, never have a lack of power. I board about 22MPH & my son likes about 24-25.
Hope this helps. |
|
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”
Ben Franklin |
|
levinmark
Senior Member Joined: November-11-2010 Location: illinois Status: Offline Points: 375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the input, we'll be attending clinton in the spring, thats a good idea to try them out and see what is the best scenario. As far as an alignment goes, it is on the agenda, been reading up it, waiting for a little more warm weather to work on it in the garage. Thanks again
|
|
levin
|
|
Luchog
Grand Poobah Joined: April-17-2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 2135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Levinmark, in a 95' ski, which is the same hull as yours, we used one 540lbs sack on the back and 350lbs on each side of the engine plus driver/observer. It was used as wakeboard boat. wake was huge.
The 97 mentioned above is a different hull and will need more on the back than yours as the wake on that hull is rampier. I think you'll do fine with 350-500lbs sacks aft on the sides on the engine. |
|
Morfoot
Grand Poobah Joined: February-06-2004 Location: South Lanier Status: Offline Points: 5320 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Mark here's a thought for you... I see that you are in Illinois and we know there is a gathering at Lake Clinton in May so you could plan on attending, talk to those who are going and see if any are bringing their Fat Sacs. If so then you could try out different sacs and placements and see what works best for you.
|
|
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
|
|
Luchog
Grand Poobah Joined: April-17-2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 2135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
- threadjack - Snobs, how many people on board beside the sacks and how many rpms at boarding speeds? Trying to help a friend around here with prop selection.
thanks |
|
SNobsessed
Grand Poobah Joined: October-21-2007 Location: IA Status: Offline Points: 7102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
1442 should be a good prop for you. It has worked well for us ('89 w/ 1.23 trans). We run 2 400 lb sacks, usually not full. If you want to try surfing, just put 1 sack behind the motor, the other alongside. We put in a aux power outlet near stern for the tsunami pump, big improvement over tossing the cord up front!
|
|
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”
Ben Franklin |
|
bbishop1974
Senior Member Joined: May-16-2010 Location: rindge,nh Status: Offline Points: 275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
it's like owning a pickup truck.built to work.just don't drive like a donkey and keep up with the service on the trans including alignment like eric said and you will be fine.
|
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
you wont hurt a properly aligned transmission also
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
aussiesport
Newbie Joined: March-06-2010 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I ride behind a friends 97 ski , and he runs 2 750 bags on the rear seat
|
|
levinmark
Senior Member Joined: November-11-2010 Location: illinois Status: Offline Points: 375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks, that makes sense about having two sacs instead of the one in the back of the boat. To answer a couple questions, the boat is definetely used for slaloming and footing more than boarding. I like to board, but it is not the main use for the boat. As far as props go, I have a new 1442 ready to put on as soon as it warms up a little. Cant weight to try that out. Maybe I'll give the two sac method a try. I want to see what others have to say about it before I purchase anything.
|
|
levin
|
|
wakeboardin2k4
Platinum Member Joined: December-14-2006 Location: Hopatcong, NJ Status: Offline Points: 1117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My 86 is going to obviously have a very different wake than your 96 so my suggestions come with no experience of a 96 hull.
Ive found for myself and others that 500lbs + - on each side of the motor works well. Having too much weight in the rear creates a curb of a wake in my boat. Not sure how yours would react. The nice thing about 2 sacs is it gives you options. One large sac gives you only 1 option, back of the boat. |
|
"I'm planning to bring my girl that rides on a trailer with me and leave my girl that complains about camping at home"
|
|
Luchog
Grand Poobah Joined: April-17-2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 2135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Fat sacks are ok to use, just for ease of mind you should match your prop with the amount of weight you'll be displacing.
Stock props on ski boats are for skiing, so you have some options for a weighted boat, but then you should also consider that if you're still using the boat for ski you dont want a prop that will compromise skiing performance. So first you should state how and what you will use the boat for. As regarding fat sacks, you should ask how are people weighting your same boat, as 750 or 1100lbs is a lot of weight for a lone sack and you could possibly need many sacks distributed along the boat. Sumo sacks or Pro X series are nice. Sumo come with a valve for not spilling water when you fill them, on the X-series you have to buy it apart. |
|
levinmark
Senior Member Joined: November-11-2010 Location: illinois Status: Offline Points: 375 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey fellas, I would like some input on having a fat sac for our 96' I read a lot about having them and how they improve the wake greatly for wakeboarding, but I am concerned about wear and tear on the tranny with the extra load. Any thoughts on this, or am I being to cautious? Looking to possibly purchase one for the upcoming season. I have checked out the fly high fat sac on Wakemakers.com. One is a 750lb. sac and the other is 1100 lbs.. Anybody have any experience with these?
Thanks |
|
levin
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |