cylinder head install |
Post Reply |
Author | |
'72 mustang
Newbie Joined: July-13-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: August-08-2005 at 2:53pm |
Thanks, Bob's2001
|
|
72 CC mustang
|
|
Bob's2001
Senior Member Joined: March-28-2005 Location: Lake Jackson TX Status: Offline Points: 241 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If the heads have the original pedestal rockers they are not adjustable.
|
|
Bob Ed
83 2001 |
|
captan1
Senior Member Joined: June-02-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here's the website for the cam spec's
http://engineparts.com/motorhead/techstuff/2003marine/Camshafts_Lifters_TimingComponents.pdf |
|
Jim_In_Houston
Platinum Member Joined: September-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yeh Reid. I installed the SpeedPro cam. I am very happy with it too. I have learned to control myself and seldom run over 4500RPMs, (unless some kid in a shiny new boat tries to pass).
|
|
Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang
|
|
'72 mustang
Newbie Joined: July-13-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey guys, sorry I didn't reply sooner. Got confused with two different torque specs and the GT40P talk. Anyways I just got the boat and already had to tear into to it(seller left out part about blown head gaskets), but it is a 351 going by the half inch diameter head bolts (and the 351 casting in the valley) and they are 302 heads. I went with the torque specs out of the book for a 351 since those are the bolts I used. I appreciate you guys helping me out. Are these valve adjustable or do I just tighten all the way down? Thanks again.
|
|
72 CC mustang
|
|
reidp
Platinum Member Joined: December-06-2003 Location: Mooresville, NC Status: Offline Points: 1804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You'd think by now I'd have this figured out. Sorry.
|
|
reidp
Guest |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I guess I didn't log in correctly or something on that last post.
|
|
reid
Guest |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jim,
Is this the engine with the Speed Pro cam? If so, you could probably gain some speed and most definitely fuel economy if you brought the rpms back down to 5000-5200. When I've run a Fed 12x13 prop with the similar engine combo, I would turn about 5500 but lost about 2 mph, compared to 5200 with a 12x14 Fed. |
|
Jim_In_Houston
Platinum Member Joined: September-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes, I install my GT40Ps on my '68 with a 289. I'm happy with them. I know that any lack of performanc is not due to flow restriction. I run up to about 5500 RPM at about 48MPH (with no head wind).. Fast enough for that old hull imho.
|
|
Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang
|
|
reidp
Platinum Member Joined: December-06-2003 Location: Mooresville, NC Status: Offline Points: 1804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey, since '72 Mustang didn't reply after the good info, is it possible that he meant to say 351 heads on a 302? Most all of the 4V Ford powered Mustangs of that '71-76 or so vintage were 302's with 351 heads as part of the Ford factory supplied marine long block package. This also included the 351 cam and firing order as did later models.
|
|
captan1
Senior Member Joined: June-02-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I love my gt40p heads. Jim, have you installed the heads yet? I think I'd do that again if I bought another boat.
|
|
64 Skier
Senior Member Joined: February-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 415 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sorry....had 302 on the brain....Gotta Ski is correct on the torque.
|
|
Jim_In_Houston
Platinum Member Joined: September-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes we did.
|
|
Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang
|
|
captan1
Senior Member Joined: June-02-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Did we get GT40P heads off an Explorer, and new bolts?
|
|
GottaSki
Grand Poobah Joined: April-21-2005 Location: NE CT Status: Offline Points: 3363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
finish @ 90-100-112 for a 351.
|
|
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."
River Rat to Mole |
|
64 Skier
Senior Member Joined: February-08-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 415 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
50 then 60 then 75 ft-lbs.
|
|
'72 mustang
Newbie Joined: July-13-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yeah, the head bolts are 1/2" diameter. Thanks guys.
|
|
72 CC mustang
|
|
Siveck
Senior Member Joined: March-14-2005 Location: Birmingham, AL Status: Offline Points: 100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The torque specification is in relation to the diameter size of the bolt. Being that you are using the bolts for a 351 (larger size than 302 bolts possibly), then you should use the 351 specification.
|
|
1975 Ski Nautique
"Small Letter Boat" |
|
GottaSki
Grand Poobah Joined: April-21-2005 Location: NE CT Status: Offline Points: 3363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
351...
The shop opened up the bolt holes to 1/2", right? |
|
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."
River Rat to Mole |
|
'72 mustang
Newbie Joined: July-13-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I am getting my heads back from the machine shop today and am getting ready to put the engine back together. I have 302 heads on a 351 block. Anyone know which torque specifications I should use, 302 or 351? Any other helpful hints are apprreciated as well. Thanks.
|
|
72 CC mustang
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |