PCM 5.8hp 260hp |
Post Reply |
Author | |
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May-06-2006 at 10:40pm |
Novo85. Check out newdimensiontowers.com. This guy was the original OEM manufacturer for the Mastercraft Zero Flex towers. He started new dimensions and makes copies of original towers from CC, MC, Tige, etc. They're not cheap, but they are quite a bit cheaper than buying from the manufacturer. Best of all, he'll give you a tower that looks like a CC Flight Control Tower. Just makes it look like a Nautique.
85 MC is a good boat as well, but I'm sure you'll like the room in your new CC. BKH |
|
Livin' the Dream
|
|
Novo85
Newbie Joined: May-06-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the response. I will not be barefooting, however I will be wakeboarding and slamom skiing for sure. I hope to teach my son to barefoot in a few years. Thanks for the Ballast info. I am not familiar with any ballast systems. I'll drive the boat on Tuesday with a pending purchase agreement.
Any suggestions on tower locations for a 1999 Sport Nautique E26 converted Nautique lover coming from a 1985 Mastercraft |
|
E26
|
|
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Novo,
What are you going to do with the boat. Without any detail, it's hard to say if it is enough power. If you are a big guy, and are going to barefoot, you'll probably need to be sure that the boat is not heavily weighted to get enough top end. I haven't been in that exact boat with that exact motor, but under normal conditions, I'd expect top end to be 42 or 43 mph. My neighbor has the fuel injected 310hp and we get 44-45 mph top end with a four blade prop. I assume you'll drive it before you buy it. As to resale value, admittedly the fuel injected motors are probably the more desirable. However, having the standard motor should be reflected in the price you pay now. I would expect the price to be 500-1000 less with the carburated motor than if you had the fuel injected motor. The fuel injected motor was not introduced until 95 I believe. There are an awful lot of sport nautiques from 90-95 running around with carburated motors and no one's complaining. Also, just thought, if you plan to load the boat up with 2 or 3000 lbs of ballast, you may have some power issues, but, unless you are a very good wakeboarder, that's an awful lot of weight. BKH |
|
Livin' the Dream
|
|
Novo85
Newbie Joined: May-06-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Very close to purchasing a 1999 Sport Nautique with a pcm 5.8 260hp carbureted system. I was wondering if anyone out there is familiar with the pro's and cons of this motor. Is there enough power. I noticed it was the smallest motor offered in 1999. Will this affect the resale value should we decide to upgrade in a few years etc. Help. Need to decide by sunday eve....
|
|
E26
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |