I've been wondering . . . |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May-15-2015 at 9:43pm |
|
WOW!!! You had better run home and drain your toilet too!!! |
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A new impeller is always a good idea. Cheap insurance. We recently toured the St. John's River in Florida. Apx 200 miles over a few days. The ONLY thing I did to prepare the '77 America Skier (purchased just for the trip, and now sold) was to rebuild the RWP. Those impeller photos are of an impeller out of a '73 Resorter in WI -- not my boat, but I was using it when the impeller failed, and I noticed a high temp reading . That's why I was towed home by a friend in his 'toon, and why I rebuilt the CC's pump: |
||
Gary S
Grand Poobah Joined: November-30-2006 Location: Illinois Status: Offline Points: 14096 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You might blow the water out of the exhaust hoses but your not going to blow the cooling water out of the manifold and risers internal passages. At that point you'd be better off to raise the front of the boat to drain the pipes.
|
||
caricoa28
Newbie Joined: June-26-2012 Location: Lodi, Ca Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thank you so much for the info.. It looks like ill be keeping the water in the system from now on, I don't keep my boat outside so its never going to freeze, so no worries about that.. In fact, I think im going to go buy a new impeller this week just because even looking at Grants impeller in pieces like that makes me nervous! Thanks again guys
|
||
Steve
Lodi , Ca |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The quick start will not harm the impeller, it's still holding water. Save it for the quick start prior to your next outing though, water will preven corrosion (caused by air). It's only harmful if it will freeze, but blowing them out won't be enough to save you anyways.
|
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Or, maybe you'd prefer to run it dry:
|
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would hesitate to run the engine (and therefore the RWP) out of the water unless water was being supplied. The impeller in the RWP is certain to fail if run dry for even very short periods. In other words, it's better to keep water in the pump, so it is not run dry for even very short periods of time.
-=Grant=- |
||
caricoa28
Newbie Joined: June-26-2012 Location: Lodi, Ca Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So to go back to what GMacLaren was saying about the loop keeping water in the pump and primed when the boat is out of the water- Every time I took my boat out of the water I would start the engine to blow out the water from the exhaust manifolds. I was told that water sitting in there for long periods of time could be harmful. Was this good advice, or should I be leaving the water in there.
|
||
Steve
Lodi , Ca |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
No, on a 72 I don't even think it was a factory option. A PO installed it. |
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I thought it might have been included for boats being used in warmer waters, where plant growth might cause pickup problems. I had never seen one, 'til I got my first CC. |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
No, I have none on any of my boats. Evidently in the 80's, lakes got weedier/dirtier! |
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The pickup hose on the '72 also has a strainer in line. If I do my boating on clean water lakes, is this device needed? A good idea? I've been thinking of not re-installing it when I do the plumbing.
-=Grant=- |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Every boat I've had from the late 60's an early 70's (when the dual pocket chryslers were common) had the dual pickups regardless of which engine was installed. The fords have the 2nd pickup looped as shown above. The chryslers (at least the earlier ones) had a dedicated line to each. Ease of manufacturing to always drill 2 holes I imagine.
The under/over tranny routing of the hose makes adding a tee easier, as well as draining the tranny cooler. Not sure id go out of my way to make the change on an older boat though... Might depend on how the trans cooler is mounted. |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, the H/M's were dual as well as some Interceptors but, the RWP 's have a common suction to dual cavities. My 312 is a good example. |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Grant,
Since your Skier has a Ford, it was ether repowered at one time or more likely the factory installed dual pickups for ether a Ford or Chrysler. Times and money was tough back then so they never really knew which engines would show up first! |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
No, it's just a routing convenience for the hose. No P trap needed. Enough water will stay in the RWP for a prime. It's the reason I always bump the engine over when draining for winter.
Because Chrysler marines recirculated warm water back to one of the thru hulls. Take a look in the manual in the reference section at the cooling schematic. |
||
Orlando76
Grand Poobah Joined: May-21-2013 Location: Mount Dora, FL Status: Offline Points: 3108 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
I believe Holman Moody's were dual. My Escort and dad's Waukesha are routed and set up just like your Waukesha.
|
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Here they are on the '72: |
||
skutsch
Grand Poobah Joined: June-19-2008 Location: Racine, WI Status: Offline Points: 2874 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I also have never seen one with 2 pick ups, where are they located?
|
||
GMacLaren
Senior Member Joined: August-22-2013 Location: St. Louis, MO Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This photo of my '77 American Skier shows how the routing of the raw water inlet hose forms an inverted "P-trap" of sorts: I'll guess this is done to keep water in the pump (and primed) when the boat is out of the water, or engine not running. The '72 Skier I'm rebuilding did not have this "loop" in its hose routing when I acquired it. It will be a month or two before we do the plumbing on that boat. I'm wondering if I should route the new hoses like the '77 -- or will the height of the transmission cooler mounting provide enough of this "lift" to keep water in the pump? (I can mount the '72's cooler higher than it was when I acquired it. Another question -- why does the '72 have TWO thru-hull pickups, yet the '77 (and other boats I've experienced) have only one. -=Grant=- |
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |