Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prop help for my Southwind on steroids
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Prop help for my Southwind on steroids

 Post Reply Post Reply Page   12>
Author
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Prop help for my Southwind on steroids
    Posted: July-15-2024 at 4:15pm
Congrats on the boat, a 49 year old Southwind 18 running 50 mph sounds very healthy to me!
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-14-2024 at 12:01pm
I think I hear ol' blue eyes in the background singing " I did it my way" Wink
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-14-2024 at 11:40am
Finally a conclusion.
Took the boat out specifically for high-speed test runs. After five runs from idle to wide-open throttle-top speed.
The result is 4700 RPMs 50 mph. That’s kind of a round average numbers and with two people in the boat,
Both into the wind and with it.
Everything seems to be great!
The thing starts, idles, accelerates, sounds great.
It seems as if it may have just left the Correctcraft factory in 1975 with a little more horsepower than it originally had.
Going to take the great advice above and enjoy it.
That completes everything on this rebuild and I appreciate all the help and time everyone gave me to accomplish this. It is a great boat and gets a lot attention.
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-10-2024 at 7:43am
Originally posted by DenDen DenDen wrote:


In my case, I was recommended at one time a 13 x 11 , a 12,5 x 11.5, a
13 x 12.625, a 13 x 13, and a 13 x 14.

I think you missed one Den Wink

Get that thing in the water and do some enjoying.

63 Skier said it well
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-10-2024 at 12:36am
I agree well said Joe.  One other thing I'd add ... we all want the best prop for our boats, but honestly perfection isn't necessary.  So it spins a few hundred rpm too low or too high, WOT is a few mph lower than expected, whatever (not meaning your boat DenDen, just saying for any of us).  I have 2 props for my Sport, decided which I preferred but a few people I ski with might prefer the other one.  Neither is perfect, each has it's benefits and drawbacks.  At some point we just want to launch and spin the hour meter and enjoy the boat.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-09-2024 at 11:57pm
Well said!!!!
I couldn’t agree with you more.
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-09-2024 at 9:47pm
Unfortunately propeller shops or manufacturers can’t afford to buy a bunch of boats and engines. Boat manufacturers can’t try new props on old boats to keep up on what might run right, and when you put an engine in a boat that’s never been there then all bets are off. A few people have spent way too much time
and money buying multiple boats, conducting multiple engine upgrades, and buying many props per boat/engine- blowing some up - skiing for years successfully behind others - and they get persnickety when that advice not accepted as gospel immediately. If you only bought one incorrect prop and learned who to trust on the next one then you did pretty well.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-09-2024 at 8:11pm
I bet some of you were wondering what happened to Den Den.
Since I went to Lake Norman came home sent my prop out and had it decupped, I have not had the boat in the water. It may be a couple of weeks before the final test.
But I have been thinking about purchasing a prop and the procedure to go through.
It all seems to be a guessing game of sorts at the expensive the guy buying the Prop
I say that because the only thing a person can do is look for recommendations from people who are supposed to know what prop you need.
In my case, I was recommended at one time a 13 x 11 , a 12,5 x 11.5, a
13 x 12.625, a 13 x 13, and a 13 x 14.
All I had to do was make the choice and see what worked.
Kind of a guessing game? especially since the boat was a south wind 18 which there are very few of.
I’m pretty confident I’m going to be close to what I wanted going the route I chose. I also know I could’ve probably taken another route and ended up maybe the same place.
It seems to me there should be a better way to sell propellers, but I do understand the difficulty in returning props that are wrong or perform poorly.
That’s all I have right now. I will post my findings when I get the boat in water again.
I hope everyone is having a great summer.
Back to Top
GottaSki View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: April-21-2005
Location: NE CT
Status: Offline
Points: 3363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GottaSki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-17-2024 at 8:48am
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."

River Rat to Mole
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2024 at 8:43am
Looks like you're trying for 5000 ish  now like was mentioned plenty in this thread instead of 4500 ..........sounds like a good plan to me anyways Wink
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2024 at 8:08am
Update
After vacation still same 4300 RPMs and 51 mph. Perform really nice I guess due to my nature I’m going to go against the advice of knowledgeable people and send it back to Delta to have them add six or 700 RPMs.
Will advise hopefully soon the results.
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-04-2024 at 8:34pm
The 51 mph at 4300 surprises me.  You upgraded power to a bit over 300 hp so that I guess explains it.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-03-2024 at 11:21am
Thanks for all the kind input.
We are currently trying to make sure our engine is outputting as much horsepower as possible. We have no signs of detonation and yesterday we fattened it up with some carburetor jetting and ran it again. The result was 4300 RPMs and 51 mph.
I will be going to a big lake at the end of the week for a while and will experiment with the jetting some more.
This is a cruising vacation with no skiers or tubers. So what I have will work just fine for now thanks again for all your help.
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-03-2024 at 10:39am
That all sounds about right - if for some reason I was dead set on overloading an engine with too much prop, or just in a position where it was the only prop I had to run and needed to get some recreation in, then I would make some adjustments to prevent knocking/destructifyering.   Specifically consider dialing back a couple/few degrees of timing. Could also give it a bit more fuel jetting and or higher octane gas - particularly if you are going to pull watersports.   450 dollar experiments need not become 4500 dollar season enders.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-03-2024 at 8:51am
Seems it, I can't decide if it's the little brother of the BFN or the mother of the BFN.

I think it was the mother as the story goes. Wink
Back to Top
fanofccfan View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-13-2009
Location: North Bend NE
Status: Offline
Points: 1781
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fanofccfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-03-2024 at 8:46am
Thanks for the update Ken!  Seems like a speedy boat 
2004 196 LE Ski 1969 Marauder 19 1978 Ski
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-03-2024 at 8:33am
I guess it's time for a little update on Den's prop story.

He wanted to drop his full throttle rpms down to around 4500, so after getting some input here and from various other places he got a new Acme 13x14 from Delta propeller on their recommendation (with one free rework if needed) and got some new baseline numbers you could say.

Same tach and GPS as before, he had some new numbers 35 mph at 3000 rpm, 45 mph at 4000 rpm and 49 mph at 42 to 4300 rpm and plenty of acceleration

He's sorta happy but he'd be happier at 4500 or maybe a little higher rpm.

I "gently" reminded him that nobody here had recommended that prop saying it was too much prop and would do just what it did.

I'm sure he'll update with his next step which will involve talking to Delta about picking up about 3 to 500 rpm. whether it's with a prop swap or a rework of what he has now

Just to repeat it again, he wants to stay at or a little above 4500 rpm at full throttle.

Myself, I think the answer was in the thread, but that's how you learn, get a bunch of input then take your best shot and go from there  Wink

In the meantime, I think he may be on vacation enjoying some cruisin' in his boat (or will be soon)
Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-22-2024 at 9:48pm
What Joe was trying to say was, don't plan on any adjustments to the prop.  Buy a CNC per the advice above and run it.  By running it and then "adjusting" you'll end up with worse performance than by simply running a correctly sized prop.

I found when I was first reading about modern props that the couple of rules I thought I knew about props were out the window.  I think in the past people would do a bunch of trial and error, bring their prop in for more cup or to cut down the diameter as you are talking about, but they were adjusting a prop that was perhaps adequately designed but not precise, so maybe the adjustments would help performance because the base product wasn't all that great to start with.
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-22-2024 at 6:08pm
Thanks for everyone’s help and advise it is much appreciated as usual.
I will post my findings and what Prop I decided to go with. Delta Prop is like half an hour away from me in Cleveland and will give me at least one free adjustment for what that’s worth.
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-22-2024 at 5:26pm
Originally posted by DenDen DenDen wrote:

It seems that I either need a 430 13 x 13 or a 474 13 x 12 5/8.
Both at .080 cup.
What is the expected RPM difference between a 1 inch change in pitch?
If it is as low as 200 RPMs, then these two props are basically the same. If it’s as high as 1000 RPMs, then the difference between these two props is 300 RPMs.
My understanding is by changing the cup. You could turn either one of these props into the other.
So my big question is why do they make so many props so close together?
I am still confused, but getting close.
Is it better to start with a big prop and trim it down or start with a little prop and build it up?



You would need to know your torque curve and where your current prop fell rpm wise to even make a guess at rpm’s per inch of pitch. Your understanding of cup is flawed at best and while it is possible to change cup or trim down the diameter of a cnc propeller it is not free and is now way to live.   You want the fresh cnc goodness’s.   I’ve got a boat that runs 5000 with a borrowed 431 and I bought it a fresh 475 hoping to get a few more rpm out of it - it’s 61 years old so I am hoping to give it a little easier time.
- you’ve been given the best advice you are going to get knowing what you know, but a prop and go boating
- or wait a few weeks and I’ll tell you the difference between the two props on a completely different boat with a completely different engine
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-21-2024 at 11:29pm
It seems that I either need a 430 13 x 13 or a 474 13 x 12 5/8.
Both at .080 cup.
What is the expected RPM difference between a 1 inch change in pitch?
If it is as low as 200 RPMs, then these two props are basically the same. If it’s as high as 1000 RPMs, then the difference between these two props is 300 RPMs.
My understanding is by changing the cup. You could turn either one of these props into the other.
So my big question is why do they make so many props so close together?
I am still confused, but getting close.
Is it better to start with a big prop and trim it down or start with a little prop and build it up?

Back to Top
MrMcD View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-28-2014
Location: Folsom, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3750
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrMcD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-17-2024 at 1:35pm
No problems with the prop logic, I struggle with the 1/4" clearance between the prop and hull, that just seems like a problem in the making?   I would feel better if it was at least 1/2" clearance but I am no prop expert.
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-17-2024 at 6:14am
OK Den

Now that you've been told why something like the 13x13 Acme I recommended is apparently too much prop for your application, i should probably explain my thought process.

I figure your boat is a v bottom, roughly 2400 ish pounds, roughly 320 HP  from a SBC (your desktop dyno said a little more)

Then I say to myself "do I know someone with a v bottom boat inboard with the same power from a SBC with an Acme prop on it.

After some thought, I say to myself......of course you do.

It belongs to one of my kids.

We'll call it brand "X" or maybe brand "S". 315 HP @5000 rpm SBC, it's a little porkier at about 3000 pounds

Being familiar with the bottom design of your hull not much difference in the bottoms.

Now what prop do we have on that boat I ask myself

It should work for Den's purposes.

It's a 13x12 5/8 Acme and the boat runs at 5000 rpm, 50 ish mph. As far as acceleration, we'll just say "no problems in that department" .

I'd lend you the spare prop for a trial run. but your boat would go backwards because it's a LH rotation Acme 449 and it fits  a 1 1/8 inch shaft so it would be kind sloppy in the fit department. Wink

I think TRB called it a magical prop earlier in this thread. We'll agree on that

Wanting to keep the rpms down with potentially more power and 500 or so pounds less weight, and similar hull bottoms, I figured the 13x13 RH Acme 430 would be good for you and you'd be in the high 4000 to maybe 5000 range Second choice mentioned above was the13x12 5/8 Acme 474 (the RH version of the magical 449 but for a 1 inch shaft like Den has)

So, imagine that, I have some prop experience, something similar to base the recommendation on and toss that out there.

It seems like based on some of the above comments, It's a terrible choice and a SBC just can't handle that prop.

Anybody can feel free to tell me where my logic is screwed up Wink


Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 7:14pm
Boy, look at all the activity on this thread now

I would have posted something earlier, but I was dealing with some anger management issues.

I had an angry prop that didn't want to go back into storage.

After a long conversation that I really shouldn't post here, she (Ellie is her name for obvious reasons) was happy again knowing that she still had it compared to those hot looking new young props and once she got going .......well you read it above.....she was as good as they were

That  finally calmed her down and I got her all ready for a nap

Here she is all dressed up do do double duty 

And Bill............I didn't lap the candle to the shaft, I hope nobody minds  Wink









Back to Top
DenDen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-20-2023
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DenDen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 3:19pm
How about some boat pictures?

















photo uploading sites
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Online
Points: 21186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 2:53pm
To clarify, not every hand finished prop is a flexy paperweight- just the ones that run away up top. Can lend you one ken, if you want it!
Back to Top
GottaSki View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: April-21-2005
Location: NE CT
Status: Offline
Points: 3363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GottaSki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 2:37pm
I concur with Joe, let them spin, more rippems the better.. Low 5's on an engine with lungs is right there
higher vacuum when cruising. better throttle response, less strain per power pulse
a little spicy with one aboard, means perfect when loaded up.
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."

River Rat to Mole
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 2:26pm
There’s no doubt that the smaller bladed cast/hand worked props are often faster than an acme or cnc OJ - particularly on a smaller/lighter older boat like mustangs/skiers and ski nautiques older than the 2001’s.   They have less drag and often help bring up the nose. The only boat i have ion the water today is rocking a federal - but it sure does take the joy out of really hammering on it - can’t throw $450, or multiple 450s at everything in the barn .

I’ve spent the equivalent of a pretty good modern wakeboard boat rebuilding small blocks on steroids - all the best steroids - that I have broken messing around for more speed- it was usually props that were just a bit too big, or brought down the rpm a bit too much that broke them.   More rpm - less load, less stress - less heat- less detonation- less pieces of metal in the bilge.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11125
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 2:00pm
Originally posted by fanofccfan fanofccfan wrote:

Nice work Ken!  Did you lap the props when you switched them?  If not then I am not so sure the data is reliable!  (that is meant to be a funny by the way)  Wink

OK DBB............that's good for my chuckle for the day, maybe the week, maybe longer.

Better watch it, I just checked, I still have that picture of you sitting on a trash can driving the Mex Nautique. One of my favorite CCF pictures with that big smile Wink

I wonder what that boat had for a prop after seeing the other pictures of the boat
Back to Top
fanofccfan View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-13-2009
Location: North Bend NE
Status: Offline
Points: 1781
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fanofccfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-16-2024 at 1:52pm
Nice work Ken!  Did you lap the props when you switched them?  If not then I am not so sure the data is reliable!  (that is meant to be a funny by the way)  Wink
2004 196 LE Ski 1969 Marauder 19 1978 Ski
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page   12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC