Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Where to get Reman’d 351W?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Where to get Reman’d 351W?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page   12>
Author
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Where to get Reman’d 351W?
    Posted: February-28-2008 at 1:49pm
8122pbrainard,

This is the history of the boat as told to me by owner#2. It was used as a show boat down in Cyprus Gardens back in '79-80.(I don't place much credence in this story, but whatever.)

Owner#2 bought it then in '85 had to replace the engine and he, working in a Ford dealership, replaced it with what he had avail.

I bought it in '87 and did some minor top end restore work in '94. I would put on average 100 hrs a year up through the last year it ran in '06. I'm not sure how many boating hrs it had on it before I got it or how many miles the truck(70's) put on it, but that engine has lasted and been through one hell of a life with almost no problems.

btw, very good looking Atom & Tique you have there. They've obviously been through quite a lot also.
jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-28-2008 at 12:45pm
John, I'm curious as to why you put the LH in it back in 85? By the way,you must put lots of hours on your boats!


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-28-2008 at 12:25pm
JoeinNY,

I'm down in Baltimore. I recall Auburn being almost as north as Rochester.

Without looking at it, I'm pretty sure I have a 13x13 prop good shape, which gave me a top speed of 45mph(not sure of RPM, but I kept the motor all stock, no HO). It would do 0-40mph in just a hair under 7 seconds. Again, I don't have burning desire make the switch. I've enjoyed this boat for 20+ years and don't plan on selling, so resale value isn't an issue with me.

Very nice of you for your offer, I guess it sounds like I just have to make the decision to switch up. I want to get the engine ordered within the next week or 2, so I will get in touch with you if that what I end up deciding. Let me know if the 13x13 LH is good with you. What is your prop specs?
jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-28-2008 at 2:55am
The circ pump should be bidirectional and the raw water pump flips over (inlet becomes outlet) and is then fine, although a new impellor is in order although it probably is anyway. None of my RH parts are anything special but they were on a recently rebuilt running motor when pulled. I think the prop is in decent shape and therefore has some value the starter and dist if you were close enough to come by I would give ya if your prop was equilivent and something I could use I might do a straight swap and throw in the starter/distributor for you covering the shipping on both sides. Whatever my info is in my profile if you want to email. Waterdog, I agree the 1.7 ratio rockers are alright if you dont want to swap out a cam but if your going with a new cam anyway might as well get your lift there. As for pistons, a good keith black hypereutectic is hard to beat for performance vs. price and be sure that you end up with a compression ratio you want with the new heads.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-28-2008 at 2:23am
Originally posted by JoeinNY JoeinNY wrote:

If you decide to go back to right hand, I could make you a good deal for a used right hand starter, distributor, prop, whatever else


I appreciate the offer. Without doing an in depth study, I figure the only thing preventing me would be the additional cost of the parts to switch. I read somewhere someone pointed out it may get harder to get RH Rotat parts if needed in the future. How about Water circulation pump or raw sea water pump, are they different?

I guess I don't have a burning desire to make the switch, but if everyone recommends it, I would consider it.

jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 9:05pm
Cam research also recommended stock type pistons. I asked about 93-95 ford cobra 1.7
roller rockers,Scott said to stay with a good 1.6 The ford/mustang sites don't care for them ether(not rebuildable, prone to "gronk's in the bearings. Gronk's = anything other than smooth operation.From what you guys say the weiand stealth is the preferred intake so that's the way I'm leaning.Does any one want the 2 piece efi intake from a 90 F150 351w 1st come takes it!       
- waterdog -

78 Ski Tique

Back to Top
81nautique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-03-2005
Location: Big Rock, Il
Status: Offline
Points: 5779
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 81nautique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 6:23pm
Originally posted by Waterdog Waterdog wrote:

JoeinNY
Does the crank have to be ground for R/Rotation with a one peice rear main seal?
The pistons don't have to reversed on the rods (351w)? Any other short block prep to go from std. to R/R ?


DOC,

I didn't fully read the question, I was refering to the bearing surfaces being ground in reverse and the answer to that unasked question is yes. If you didn't do that with yours you may experience premature bearing failure.

As for piston offset I'm afraid you're wrong, the pistons that came out of my 351 were not indexed backwards but the forged Speed Pros that went in were offset so they needed to be indexed backwards. Your statment my be true for stock original parts, I wouldn't know but it is too broad an answer for the endless possibilities when putting these engines back together.
You can’t change the wind but you can adjust your sails
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 5:13pm
Your plan is a good one, your still going to need, a good bearing set (cam and main after your main is measured and prepped) new pistons and rings (after you decide on how much to bore the block and work on the connecting rods. Talk to your machine shop about grinding/polishing in reverse his machine may do it, or he may say it is fine and warranty it the other way. While your at it get an intake..
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 5:06pm
As you guys know I've been chasing this water in the oil thing in my 86 2001 since last summer. I found a 90 351w truck eng. that's never been apart. I'm going to use that block , GT 40p heads and a cam research cam. Scott at cam research quoted me a complete gasket kit W/one piece r/seal for around $150-
Now I have 2 of everything to build one engine
I WAS going to measure the cranks and use the best one? Any more pit falls? The machine shop is a good one is it possible to turn the crank in reverse to grind and polish it ?     
- waterdog -

78 Ski Tique

Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 4:24pm
I have seen offset pistons in a 302 so they do exist, common in boats? probably not. How big a difference does doing the finish grinding on the crank in the same direction you will be using said crank, debateable

With newer coated trimetal bearings, and better grinding surface finishes IMHO it is probably not the issue it once was.. now cheap out on the bearings and get an autostore rebuilt crank and run it in the wrong direction and my guess is you never join the thousand hour club.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
boat dr View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-27-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4245
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote boat dr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 4:09pm
Chris, you have made this statement before,then as now I will disagree.....
165 hrs. later I have not had any issue with the rear seal or any bearing faiures.But maybe I am setting on a time bomb, what do I know.
I researched the L/Hand into R/hand rotation and was told the issue was a non issue.
But maybe it is because I baby this stroker and do not run the DOG SH#T out of her.During the early days of trying to prop her out Correctly she saw 6000+ several times.
Now a day on the lake ends with several blasts at 5200+ till Karen says back her down.She will pull a 12/15 in excess of that rpm for as long as I want to feed that BITCH.
No leaks , no noise nor loss of oil pressure and no doubt that I will not change anything if and when I build another.....Boat dr
Back to Top
79nautique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-27-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7872
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 79nautique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 3:57pm
I believe Allen Is refering to the grind and it's direction and not if the crank has to be machined to work with the seal, which is still true I guess. But when the crank is ground if it the bearing journals are ground like a Std rotation crank, it does create some issues if you use it in a reverse application, as in shortened seal and bearing life.
Back to Top
boat dr View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-27-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4245
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote boat dr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 3:50pm
Allen , if you use the one piece rear main seal no machine work is required. The knurling are used only on the two piece seal.
Read my post above as to what I did on mine.
Also there is no pison pin offset on the Windor engines, 302 or 351.
Back to Top
boat dr View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-27-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4245
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote boat dr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 3:41pm
The reverse rotation seals are getting hard to come by. Woody says he has them in stock,but....
PCM no longer stocks them, and the Victor #comes up as NLA. With this being the case if you can find the seal no mods are needed to run a STD. crank in the reverse mode.
This is what I did with my stroker, used a 94 302 block w/ one piece rear seal.It was a roller cam block, but a roller reverse cam was outside of my finances.
Went with a flat tappett from Cam Research that was far cheaper....my .02 worth
If not satisfied I will gladly refund your money.....................Boat dr
Back to Top
81nautique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-03-2005
Location: Big Rock, Il
Status: Offline
Points: 5779
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 81nautique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 3:41pm
Originally posted by Waterdog Waterdog wrote:

JoeinNY
Does the crank have to be ground for R/Rotation with a one peice rear main seal?
The pistons don't have to reversed on the rods (351w)? Any other short block prep to go from std. to R/R ?


Crank ground for reverse, absolutley.

Depends on what pistons your putting in it. Have your machinist check the pistons for offset and he'll assemble the rods accordingly.
You can’t change the wind but you can adjust your sails
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 3:06pm
JoeinNY
Does the crank have to be ground for R/Rotation with a one peice rear main seal?
The pistons don't have to reversed on the rods (351w)? Any other short block prep to go from std. to R/R ?
- waterdog -

78 Ski Tique

Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 12:48pm
If you decide to go back to right hand, I could make you a good deal for a used right hand starter, distributor, prop, whatever else is different but I don’t remember anything else right now. These guys are right about the transmission it does go either way, but it cant reverse the direction of an engine. Forward always turns the same direction the engine turns, reverse can’t be used to make the boat go forward because it is not strong enough for the full power of the engine. The pump needs to be rotated for the transmission to work at all in the new direction but it’s a 10 minute job fairly painless. I have gone from the correct way RH prop, reverse rotation direction to the “incorrect way” so I could use a standard ground stroker kit, and hydraulic roller cam so I am familiar with the operation, and have a workshop full of the old parts. I am going the long way around by now using a later model pcm transmission to get my prop back the “correctway” but that involves a new transmission, mounts, propshaft, and prop. If you were up and running I would say its not worth it to move to RH just to get rid of the lean, however since IIRC its only about two hundred dollars from rapido to RH instead of LH and for about 225 including shipping I could get you the parts you need to go back I would say go back, if you ever sold it being incorrect would be a serious deduct in price for most people.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 11:52am
Originally posted by jfarc jfarc wrote:


But, I did just put a new BW 1:1 lefthand rotat trans in it a few years back,


LH or RH, the trans is the same. During assembly, the pump just needs to be oriented. Like Tim has mentioned, now it the time to go back to a RH and do it correctly.


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-27-2008 at 11:36am
TRBenj, it sometimes takes a little bit, but I usually do come around.

Yes, I've always disliked how the boat keels to starboard when I'm the only one in it. But, I did just put a new BW 1:1 lefthand rotat trans in it a few years back, so I guess I'll have to make sure I carry a couple bikini-clad ladies with me to offset the torque.

jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Online
Points: 21183
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 12:37pm
Originally posted by jfarc jfarc wrote:

Although, as stated in the links, you can't just look at the prop rotation to determine engine rotation, since the trans may reverse it to make the boat move forward.

JFarc, glad youre coming up to speed.

The boat would have originally had a reverse rotation engine in it, tied to a BW 1:1 tranny (which can be indexed for either rotation) and a RH prop.

Only Correct Crafts with the 1.23 trans ('89 and newer) reverse the direction of engine rotation- which allow them to turn RH props with a conventional LH engine. Your BW 1:1 can only turn the same direction as the motor, so you can verify what you have by looking at the prop (if you didnt already know).

If repowering, give some consideration to going back to a RH engine, as it will improve the performance of the boat. As was previously mentioned, a RH prop will counteract the weight of the driver. The hull has unequal amounts of hook in it to allow to ride level as well.
Back to Top
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 12:22pm
I'll tell ya, this has always been confusing. I did mis-state in an above post that I had a righthand standard rotation engine. This obviously contradicts each other since a 'standard' rotation engine turns counter-clock wise when viewed from the rear of the engine, which is also called 'lefthand' rotation. I've always known my boat to be 'standard rotation', I just incorrectly tied that to 'righthand rotation'.

Yes, a truck 351W left hand standard rotation engine was installed in the boat in 1985 and is still in it. I'm not sure what the boat had in it originally.

Here are some links to help (at least help me) understand the rotation thing.

http://www.boatpartsinfo.com/engine-rotation.html

http://www.propowermarine.com/faq-rotate.htm

Although, as stated in the links, you can't just look at the prop rotation to determine engine rotation, since the trans may reverse it to make the boat move forward.

Thanks to all for setting me straight on this. I corrected my errors in above posts as not to confuse.
jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Online
Points: 21183
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 11:31am
Originally posted by 79nautique 79nautique wrote:

But the motor in your boat is a reverse rotation engine from the factory. So if you want to get any old motor that's fine, but it better come with everythign because, your starter, distributor, prop and tranny will not match up with a standard rotation motor.


I agree that the boat would have had a reverse rotation motor from the factory- but it doesnt sound like the motor currently installed is the original.

Originally posted by jfarc jfarc wrote:

An early 70's p/u truck 351W is what the boat has had in it since 1985.


Jfarc, all of your parts might already be LH. The easiest way to tell is to look at the prop.
Back to Top
79nautique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-27-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7872
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 79nautique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 10:27am
Originally posted by jfarc jfarc wrote:

Not sure where he's going with that, I don't need a reverse rotation.

Like me, my engine doesn't go both ways. Not that there's anything wrong with, mind you... ;-)


wheather or not you go both ways means nothing. But the motor in your boat is a reverse rotation engine from the factory. So if you want to get any old motor that's fine, but it better come with everythign because, your starter, distributor, prop and tranny will not match up with a standard rotation motor.

I had a Jasper class II motor that I had no isuues with, just make sure it has the right oil pan and timing cover, swap then if you need to.
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 7:55am
Originally posted by jfarc jfarc wrote:

I don't need a reverse rotation.


Are you sure? I just don't want you to have problems after you get the engine.


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
Behl View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December-05-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Behl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 2:38am
Has anyone on the site used a Jasper reman? Have heard both good and bad. I used a reman 8V-71 Det. Diesel and it was fine - known others which were not.
Steve in Indy

Redone 1977 Ski Tique
Back to Top
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-26-2008 at 1:56am
Not sure where he's going with that, I don't need a reverse rotation.

Like me, my engine doesn't go both ways. Not that there's anything wrong with, mind you... ;-)
jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
eric lavine View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: August-13-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eric lavine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-25-2008 at 11:24pm
WD, i meant his is a righty?, he needs reverse rotation? i didnt know
"the things you own will start to own you"
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-25-2008 at 5:14pm
Eric
It will be a reverse rotation engine after the rebuild with the right crank seals.
- waterdog -

78 Ski Tique

Back to Top
jfarc View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: February-24-2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jfarc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-25-2008 at 5:03pm
The only total engine tear down and rebuild I've ever attempted was my '69 Bug 28 years ago. Turned a 1500 into a 1660(I think) firebreathing, vette-eating menace. (well, at least the firebreathing part was true, ha!)

I decided 14 years ago when I had the Head corrode through, that if I ever have another water related problem with the current engine that I'd scrap it and get a new one. This for fearing the rest of the engine could have the same corroded thin walls and didn't want to sink any $$$ into it. I think I've definitely gotten my $$$ out this engine.
jfarc

1979 SN 351W LH

13x14 Amce #1459 Prop

Back to Top
eric lavine View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: August-13-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eric lavine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-25-2008 at 4:19pm
John, is this something you could handle rebuilding yourself? you did the top already so it sounds like your pretty mechanically inclined and the money you save doing yourself can go towards some HP,
"the things you own will start to own you"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page   12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC