raising a pylon |
Post Reply |
Author | |
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: March-06-2006 at 4:01pm |
Although a full rebuild is years away, I was daydreaming today about modifying my engine. Seems like an easy way to gain a some horsepower is by adding an aluminum dual plane intake and a carb spacer. The problem is, these mods may not fit under the motorbox.
If I were to raise the motorbox a few inches to accomodate the go-fast parts, it may be in the way of the rope when its attached to the pylon. My question is- would it be possible to remove the pylon and put in an appropriate spacer (steel?) to gain a few inches? What problems may be encountered? Is it summer yet? |
|
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
TRBenj,
I suppose anything's possible, but why do you want to go messin' with that engine? One of the great things about these boats is that they run forever. Seems to me if you start modifying when the engine doesn't need it, you might end up like those jet boat guys who are broken down as much as they are on the water. Besides, even though it's only 240 horse, that boat will yank your arms out, pulls a footer easily, and will get up multiple skiers without much problem. It should have a top speed of 44 or 45 mph. You could spend thousand of dollars and not break 50. The hulls just aren't designed for speed. They are designed to keep the nose down to reduce wake size coming off the back of the boat. I had a 98 with the 310 HP engine and it was on 1-2mph faster than my bud's 90. A little more power out of the hole, but not much difference on top end. My $.02. Feel free to disagree BKH |
|
Livin' the Dream
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
BKH, thanks for the advice.
I'm well aware that these boats are made for pulling- I think the term is "water tractor." Theres nothing wrong with more power though! The motor has 1150 hrs on it now, so a rebuild may not be out of the question a few years down the road. At that time, it would make sense to add better performing parts, especially if the added cost is not signicantly more than stock pieces. Of course, low-end torque would be the name of the game. I'm just trying to have a little forethought. Projects for this spring include some floor repair and new carpet. A new interior is soon to be ordered (probably installed next fall). I'm gonna have the shop add a few extra inches of carpet to the bottom of the motorbox skin, just in case. If any changes would be needed to the floor, now would be the time to do them. Top speed is only 41 right now, so a little more would be nice for barefooting, especially 1-footers. I know this hull has some potential- Ive been in a '95 with a GT40 that could do an easy 50 |
|
81nautique
Grand Poobah Joined: September-03-2005 Location: Big Rock, Il Status: Online Points: 5796 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
TRBenj,
41 sounds a little off, did it run faster when it had lower hours on it. My old MC lost some top end at 700 hours, I called PCM cause I thought I needed a motor and they suggested a new timing chain. The boat came right back to life, might be worth checking out. |
|
You can’t change the wind but you can adjust your sails
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Last 2 owners say it always ran that way. Pulls strong, just not a lot of top end. I plan to check the timing once I get it in the water.
|
|
87sn2001
Newbie Joined: October-27-2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
TR
you have agreat looking boat..sorry but I'am with bkhallpass...keep that look...if you want a little more out of her, look into a MSD egnition..the aluminun manifold is a good idea..just find one that is the same hieght...maybe the prop pitch has been changed,have you checked that..if you do want to raise the pylon it can be done it's fiberglass into the hull. be a bit of a pain to get at unless you pull the motor frame out. good luck. |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the compliments guys. I'm not looking to change the boat much. I agree its a looker and plan to keep it looking original- which is why Im going with a factory interior, etc.
Is it true that the pylon is glassed in? The posts I read implied that it was only bolted to the floor and hull. |
|
Nautique2001
Grand Poobah Joined: June-14-2004 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 2832 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey Tim,
I've been following your thread. I think many of us have thought about boosting our HP, including me. My '86 tops out at 42 at 4,400 RPM's. It's extremely rare that I run my engine over 3,800 RPM's. Trust me, after buying a new engine, you baby it! I've got a stock 351, 255HP PCM. The only modification I'm doing is my prop. Correct Craft is installing a four blade prop for me next month. I'm also taking it to Metan Marine in Rockland, MA to have the entire hull buffed and waxed. Maybe I can pick up 1 MPH with the underneath professionally buffed and waxed. Do whatever makes you happy. Guess it comes down to your imagination and budget. Our hulls aren't meant for speed but shines with power and acceleration. I'm an acceleration nut! Got the right boat for that. Good Luck & Have Fun! Ken |
|
Nautique2001
Grand Poobah Joined: June-14-2004 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 2832 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm baffled by an original brochure I have on the '86 Ski Nautique. It has a one page performance report. I'll quote the write-up:
"The Ski Nautique 2001 runs 34 MPH at only 3000 RPM, while a 4000-RPM setting pushes the speedometer to a brisk 44 MPH. At full throttle, the 2001 reaches 47 MPH at 4250. Acceleration is crisp with the 351 cubic-inch engine pushing the boat to top speed in exactly 10 seconds". I have a new engine and I only push 42 MPH. I don't know if their test was going down the rapids of what. 47 MPH at 4250 RPM's??? Oh well, I can live with 42. |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
47 seems pretty optimistic. If my memory is correct, our '88 (which was bought new) never did better than 42-44mph.
|
|
87sn2001
Newbie Joined: October-27-2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 22 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
your 90 maybe different then my 87, but in 87 the pylon is glassed in. I know because I'am redoing my floor and the plylon is loose so I have to reinforce the glass around the bottom of the plyon. just take a mirror and a flash light and look under the floor infront of the engine, you should beable to see the bottom of your pylon,.. it is bolted around the engine frame that sits on your stringers by two large "U" bolts.
all you other slow pokes should ski/board on good clear canadian water..my old girl has hit the 47 mark before.one time my dick head friend got my spare prop recuped,motor wound up to 5500 rpm and the speedo was over 50. engines are worth more than props.. that prop went buy buy. cheers |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Two other things that may affect top end speed are elevation, and of course, how accurate the speedos are.
I'll certainly look to see if the pylon is glassed in the next time I visit my boat- its currently stored a few hrs away. |
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
the speedo's aren't very accurate after about 40mph use a gps and it will tell the truth about the speed. Also balance the motor and it's no problem turning 5500 rpm.
|
|
David F
Platinum Member Joined: June-11-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1770 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Trust everyone, it is. There is a steal cup that is glassed into the bottom of the hull. the pylon has a steal pin on the bottom that fits into the cup. This setup keeps the pylon from wanting to pivot around the floor connection. So, if you attemp to raise the pylon, you pull the pin out of the cup. I suppose you could attempt to reglass the cup on blocks to get it higher or use a longer pin in the bottom of the pylon, but your results may be dangerous.
Another option would be to fabricate a short "flight pipe" of sorts and keep your original pylon intact. |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
DavidF, thanks for the tip. Great advice, as usual. I'll take a look at it first hand, and go from there.
|
|
882001
Senior Member Joined: October-21-2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 332 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
the 98 airs had a taller pylon. may find one of those.?
|
|
kemah texas
1988 skinautique "2001" |
|
M3Fan
Grand Poobah Joined: October-22-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3185 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The pylon on the 90 sits in a cup that is glassed into the floor. In the bottom of the cup is basically a "finger" sticking up a couple inches, maybe an inch in diameter. The finger sticks into a negative "divot" in the bottom of the pylon. The pylon is not glassed in. The aluminum frame that holds the engine has a crossmember between the stringers made of aluminum. Through it are two MASSIVE U-bolts that wrap around the pylon and are secured by giant bolts (3/4 inch?). If you loosened these bolts, the pylon would probably pull straight out. I never have, but I'm pretty sure of this. It is tough to see because the crank pulley is right in your way. You have to check those bolts annually to make sure they don't loosen up.
|
|
Rick
Senior Member Joined: March-03-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 338 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I beleive that CC made a Trick pole thast was slightly longer for the 90's. The pole should NOT be glassed into the bottom. Having said that I think PCM says 2000 to 2400 hours before overhual. I would add a petronics electronic ignition module and find a prop that was 2 inches more pitch. I beleive you are running a 12.5 or 13" now. Don't worry about low end 2" in pitch will mean you can only pull up 6 skiers rather than the 10 you need for a good pyramid.LOL I I would try that first. If I were looking for faster I think I would add MPI I really don't think it would be much more than the mods you are talking about and wouldn't add height to the engine.
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Rick, I will have to check on that longer trick pole. The boat already has EI, so no worries there. I have the 1.23:1 tranny, so I'm already running a 14x16 prop. I'm adding an Acme 612 this spring.
M3, thanks for the description- I guess you would know exactly what setup I have! That gives me a perfect idea of what I would have to do to raise it. 88, I'm primarily a slalom skier, so adding that longer pylon from the Airs doesnt really appeal to me. Im just looking for 2-3". Thanks for the tip though! There is absolutely no indication that the engine needs a rebuild anytime soon- it runs strong and was very well maintained (thanks M3). These ideas just keep me entertained until its warm enough to actually work on the boat! |
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I wouldn't worry about the height to much you should be able to add the intake with out any mods to the motor box. You don't have to add the spacer, not sure if your yr boat came with one form the factory and you may have to change the flame arrestor if you have a tall style 3" for a 2" model. The performer and performer rpm should bolt right up with no problem, the air gap's are a different story and you could have issues. Your not going to gain much from the intake along and would need to replace the cam as well to see any real changes in performance.
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Specifically, I'm looking at the Weiand Stealth, which looks to be fairly tall. I've heard its 2-3" taller than stock, though I cant find height numbers on the stock manifold. The stealth is 4.37" in the front and 5.06" in the rear.
Ive got a carb spacer (stock) on there now, which is where the PCV is plumbed in. I'd like to add a blended carb spacer in there instead, or in addition to what I have. I also plan to add some sound-absorbing insulation, which will take another inch of height away. The shorter flame arrestor is an idea, but it would be nice to have a little more room, if possible. I'm not expecting much from an intake alone- but a little extra (especially on the top end) would be nice. When I do a full rebuild in a few years, I think a 393w would be a pretty nice motor for a ski boat. |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I inquired with the dealer about the longer trick pole to get more info. I also looked in the diaries and the late 80's Barefoot Nautiques seem to have slightly longer pylons. I may go this route, assuming they mount the same way my '90 does.
|
|
ccskier16
Senior Member Joined: January-29-2004 Location: Hartland, WI Status: Offline Points: 103 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Or as a non-permanent solution you could get this from Lake Elmo Sports. It is pretty common for show skiing. http://www.lakeelmosports.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=19_52&products_id=98&zenid=4f83e65bade2223ca8ebddd7045fca9b
It slips right over your stock pylon. Made for doing 360's around the boat. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |