Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fat Sacs, Good or Bad
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Fat Sacs, Good or Bad

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
levinmark View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November-11-2010
Location: illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 375
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote levinmark Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Fat Sacs, Good or Bad
    Posted: February-12-2011 at 8:54pm
Hey fellas, I would like some input on having a fat sac for our 96'   I read a lot about having them and how they improve the wake greatly for wakeboarding, but I am concerned about wear and tear on the tranny with the extra load. Any thoughts on this, or am I being to cautious? Looking to possibly purchase one for the upcoming season. I have checked out the fly high fat sac on Wakemakers.com. One is a 750lb. sac and the other is 1100 lbs.. Anybody have any experience with these?
Thanks
levin
Back to Top
Luchog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-17-2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 2135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luchog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-12-2011 at 9:57pm
Fat sacks are ok to use, just for ease of mind you should match your prop with the amount of weight you'll be displacing.
Stock props on ski boats are for skiing, so you have some options for a weighted boat, but then you should also consider that if you're still using the boat for ski you dont want a prop that will compromise skiing performance. So first you should state how and what you will use the boat for.

As regarding fat sacks, you should ask how are people weighting your same boat, as 750 or 1100lbs is a lot of weight for a lone sack and you could possibly need many sacks distributed along the boat.

Sumo sacks or Pro X series are nice. Sumo come with a valve for not spilling water when you fill them, on the X-series you have to buy it apart.
Back to Top
wakeboardin2k4 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-14-2006
Location: Hopatcong, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 1117
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wakeboardin2k4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 12:03am
My 86 is going to obviously have a very different wake than your 96 so my suggestions come with no experience of a 96 hull.

Ive found for myself and others that 500lbs + - on each side of the motor works well. Having too much weight in the rear creates a curb of a wake in my boat. Not sure how yours would react. The nice thing about 2 sacs is it gives you options. One large sac gives you only 1 option, back of the boat.
"I'm planning to bring my girl that rides on a trailer with me and leave my girl that complains about camping at home"
Back to Top
levinmark View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November-11-2010
Location: illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 375
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote levinmark Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 2:50am
Thanks, that makes sense about having two sacs instead of the one in the back of the boat. To answer a couple questions, the boat is definetely used for slaloming and footing more than boarding. I like to board, but it is not the main use for the boat. As far as props go, I have a new 1442 ready to put on as soon as it warms up a little. Cant weight to try that out. Maybe I'll give the two sac method a try. I want to see what others have to say about it before I purchase anything.
levin
Back to Top
aussiesport View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: March-06-2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aussiesport Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 5:19am
I ride behind a friends 97 ski , and he runs 2 750 bags on the rear seat
Back to Top
eric lavine View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: August-13-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eric lavine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 10:08am
you wont hurt a properly aligned transmission also
"the things you own will start to own you"
Back to Top
bbishop1974 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May-16-2010
Location: rindge,nh
Status: Offline
Points: 275
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bbishop1974 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 11:39am
it's like owning a pickup truck.built to work.just don't drive like a donkey and keep up with the service on the trans including alignment like eric said and you will be fine.
Back to Top
SNobsessed View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: October-21-2007
Location: IA
Status: Offline
Points: 7102
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SNobsessed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 12:05pm
1442 should be a good prop for you. It has worked well for us ('89 w/ 1.23 trans).     We run 2 400 lb sacks, usually not full.      If you want to try surfing, just put 1 sack behind the motor, the other alongside.   We put in a aux power outlet near stern for the tsunami pump, big improvement over tossing the cord up front!
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

Ben Franklin
Back to Top
Luchog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-17-2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 2135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luchog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 12:09pm
- threadjack - Snobs, how many people on board beside the sacks and how many rpms at boarding speeds? Trying to help a friend around here with prop selection.
thanks
Back to Top
Morfoot View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-06-2004
Location: South Lanier
Status: Offline
Points: 5320
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Morfoot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 12:26pm
Hey Mark here's a thought for you... I see that you are in Illinois and we know there is a gathering at Lake Clinton in May so you could plan on attending, talk to those who are going and see if any are bringing their Fat Sacs. If so then you could try out different sacs and placements and see what works best for you.
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
Back to Top
Luchog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-17-2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 2135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luchog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 12:27pm
Levinmark, in a 95' ski, which is the same hull as yours, we used one 540lbs sack on the back and 350lbs on each side of the engine plus driver/observer. It was used as wakeboard boat. wake was huge.

The 97 mentioned above is a different hull and will need more on the back than yours as the wake on that hull is rampier.

I think you'll do fine with 350-500lbs sacks aft on the sides on the engine.
Back to Top
levinmark View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November-11-2010
Location: illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 375
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote levinmark Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 1:37pm
Thanks for the input, we'll be attending clinton in the spring, thats a good idea to try them out and see what is the best scenario. As far as an alignment goes, it is on the agenda, been reading up it, waiting for a little more warm weather to work on it in the garage. Thanks again
levin
Back to Top
SNobsessed View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: October-21-2007
Location: IA
Status: Offline
Points: 7102
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SNobsessed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 9:02pm
Luciano - We have 4 persons, about 600# total. I estimate we put about that much weight in the fat sacks too. I would guess 200# more for gear. Have no idea how much soaked foam I have. The 1442 works great, never have a lack of power. I board about 22MPH & my son likes about 24-25.

Hope this helps.

“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

Ben Franklin
Back to Top
Luchog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-17-2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 2135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luchog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 10:06pm
Snobs, can you recall the rpms at 22mph with the loaded boat?
thank you for the info.
Back to Top
Bama Nautique View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February-26-2010
Location: Tuscaloosa, Ala
Status: Offline
Points: 153
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bama Nautique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-13-2011 at 11:31pm
Originally posted by SNobsessed SNobsessed wrote:

Luciano - We have 4 persons, about 600# total. I estimate we put about that much weight in the fat sacks too. I would guess 200# more for gear. Have no idea how much soaked foam I have. The 1442 works great, never have a lack of power. I board about 22MPH & my son likes about 24-25.

Hope this helps.



Hey Snobs... I am about to purchase a new prop for my 89SN2001. Glad to hear you are having good luck with the 1442. I will solicit info from this site in a month or so when I get closer to buying one. I also just bought two sacs at 350 lbs each. I thought they were fly High but instead are "Launch Pads by Straightline". They are round tubular shaped and I will have to figure out how to place them so they will not roll around on turns. Do you have any ballast in the front of the boat or is all of it in the back...? I read something a while back about ratio between front and back but dont remember where I read it.

Thx

89 Ski Nautique 2001


89 Ski Nautique 2001
Back to Top
SNobsessed View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: October-21-2007
Location: IA
Status: Offline
Points: 7102
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SNobsessed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-14-2011 at 10:38am
Luciano - I think 22MPH was around 2400-2500 RPM.

Doug - We don't have any weight up front other than the anchors & misc gear. The fat sacks are along side the motor box, so there is opportunity to place them more forward or aft. My son (whom all of this wake stuff is about anyways) will direct who he wants to sit where - sometimes insulting a female!

Our fat sacks are square, but I wouldn't think that even round ones would 'roll' - they squish out sideways against the gunnel & motor box.
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

Ben Franklin
Back to Top
wakeboardin2k4 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-14-2006
Location: Hopatcong, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 1117
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wakeboardin2k4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-14-2011 at 11:39am
Originally posted by SNobsessed SNobsessed wrote:

My son (whom all of this wake stuff is about anyways) will direct who he wants to sit where - sometimes insulting a female!


I love that part, it's one of the few times I can tell a woman to MOVE NOW, and not get in trouble for being a d!ck about it
"I'm planning to bring my girl that rides on a trailer with me and leave my girl that complains about camping at home"
Back to Top
Luchog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-17-2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 2135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luchog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-14-2011 at 12:28pm
Round sacks roll, I can tell you from experience!!!
Back to Top
mdvalant View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: May-06-2009
Location: Bellevue, IA
Status: Offline
Points: 2059
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mdvalant Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-14-2011 at 12:52pm
I run a single 750# in the back of the 90 ski for boarding. I like about 24mph with it and it works well for me. No lip or curl with the setup for me.
'90 Ski (sold)
'00 Sport
Mississippi River - Bellevue, IA
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC