88 dominique |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
Lakewinonanh
Newbie Joined: May-15-2011 Location: Meredith, NH Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May-15-2011 at 10:18pm |
|
found an 88 dominique for sale with 653 hrs. wants $7900, i think i can get it for 7k. its in great shape. good deal?
|
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Jason,
The big question would be the condition of the stringers??? 93 was the magic number for the composite change over but on on Dominique/BFN th exact year is up in the air. The price seems like it's on the high side but alot depends on the condition. Any pictures?? Welcome to CCfan. |
||
Lakewinonanh
Newbie Joined: May-15-2011 Location: Meredith, NH Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
thanks for the reply! here is the link to the pics. the floor is in good shape with no soft spots, not sure about the stringers.
http://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/vbclassified.php?do=ad&id=3448 |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Lakewinonanh
Newbie Joined: May-15-2011 Location: Meredith, NH Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
is there anyway to inspect the stringers?
|
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Pretty much the only non invasive way to look at them will be a visual. Yes, you can see if the engine mounting lags will tighten up in the wood but that's really very localized. You said no soft spots in the floor. look for cracking of the glass over the wood. Look for gel cracking on the hull sides about equal to the floor level. Tap the glass on the stringers with a light hammer wherever you can reach listening for a hollow sound |
||
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The original design of the removable deck lends itself to trouble. Take a camera and post some pics with the deck out.
Hope it works out. |
||
Lakewinonanh
Newbie Joined: May-15-2011 Location: Meredith, NH Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
by removeable deck you mean floor?
|
||
Bri892001
Grand Poobah Joined: September-27-2008 Location: Boston MA Status: Offline Points: 4947 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That boat appeared several times on NH Craigslist last year. It's been up for sale for a while, like well over a year, so you could used that as a bargaining chip.
The Dominique is the Barefoot Nautique hull, but without the 454 engine, it has the 351 Ford. Not a big deal, unless your big into barefooting, but another bargaining chip. The wake will be different from a typical Ski Nautique, so make sure it works for your purposes. The plus side is it will probably be a little smoother in choppy water than a Ski Nautique would because it has a deeper vee to the hull. |
||
Lakewinonanh
Newbie Joined: May-15-2011 Location: Meredith, NH Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
thanks for the help! i think i might let this one pass, i think i can do better at that price. if it has been for sale for over a year than there must be something im missing. again thank you!
|
||
Air206
Grand Poobah Joined: September-28-2008 Location: Roanoke, VA Status: Offline Points: 3000 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It is a different boat.... a Boat with a Barefoot Hull, without a Barefoot engine and without a Barefoot name..... tough sell to most folks....
|
||
jbear
Grand Poobah Joined: January-21-2005 Location: Lake Wales FL. Status: Offline Points: 8193 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Jason: A friend of mine from the ski club in Ohio had one of these rare boats for quite a few years. Very nice ride. A bit more family room inside. Ran very well even without the big block. I bet you could get this boat for less than advertised. A good barefoot boat without paying for the Barefooter name.
john |
||
"Loud pipes save lives"
AdamT sez "I'm Canadian and a beaver lover myself"... |
||
skidcl
Newbie Joined: September-09-2010 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have an '88 Dominique, and think it is a great boat. It appears you have already made, probably a good call to pass on the boat, but let me give you my experience with mine.
From my experience, it is an owner's "hands on boat". Almost any thing broken, except stringers, is owner fixable. If you are comfortable around engines, the 351/4160 Holley will be fun because their are several mods to make maintenance, and your life easier. You can easily put in an electronic ignition module to replace the points, put on a MSD or similar spark box to solve starting and running issues, play with the different jets for the carburetor, etc. If not, expect some maintenance expense if you are paying a mechanic. Points usually last a season, cooling pump impellers have to changed out, etc. But the 351 W is very easy to work on, and is strong and reliable. Speed wise, mine is usually run at 2600 rpm, at about 34 mph (gps measured), with the original prop. This combo keeps the vacuum high enough to run on just the carb primaries. The secondary jets are pretty large on this carb and when they are opened (by vacuum) at higher rpm/speed, you can almost watch the gas gauge go down. Correct Crafts of this era had electrical issues with wonky gauges, and the fix is elusive to me. My voltage gauge reads low and all other gauges read high. YOu can search for info on this, usually dealing with the need for a heavier ground wire to the negative bus, but it hasn't helped me. Stringers are not that hard to check, see if the bolts on the engine mounts pull down tight. If not, then you probably have some major issues already addressed and pass on the boat. Look for vibration of the engine from loose engine mounts. If you are serious about buying the boat, have an expert adjust the engine mounts for prop shaft alignment. That said, it is a good/great boat for most things. The wake is good for boarders, better with Fat Sacs or other source of weight. It is a joy for sunset cruising. It is comfortable in rougher water; the v -hull allows it to track like it is on rails. It handles like a sports car. I found the original seats way to low, and have since replaced them with seats on adjustable pedestals. I have added a Fly High "Monkey Bar", since some (mine) did not come with a ski pole. The wake is good for wake boarders or for pulling tubes, but it is sort of rough for skiers, and beginners usually need a longer rope. That boat is built like a tank, mine is now 23 three years old, but looks and runs better than new. Check out what a new v hulled Correct Craft would cost you. The few Doms that are sold seem always to be around $8000/ $8500 from what I have gathered from this site. Maybe this helps, Dave |
||
boat dr
Grand Poobah Joined: June-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
skidcl, if the numbers you give are correct, doubtful, then your top end speed will be at 60 plus,very doubtful..... The OEM carb for that engine was a 4160 Holley,and it is a "square bore" the primaries and secondaries are both the same size, do you have a different carb ? Have you ever removed the carb to look , or you are assuming it is a " spread bore".. The ignition system is another marine specific item. Installing a $75.00 module into a 25 year old dizzy is not an upgrade, a certain way to lighten your wallet now, and add to your problems later . Welcome to the site, your input is very much needed here, but we need accurate & honest info to pass on to our members .....Do it right or do not do it at ALL.............Boat dr |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dave,
I agree with Billy on the EI conversion not being a up grade! You need a new point set every year?? I went 28 years on one of my boats!! You had better carry a spare EI module with you - When it goes out, you can't do anthing about it. At least with a point set, you can clean them up and make it back to the dock/ramp. Stringers not owner fixable?? Spend some time here reading about all the members who have done complete stringer jobs. There are plenty!!! |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I concur that one of these numbers is off. If you do in fact have a stock prop (13x13?) and have verified the speed with a GPS, then your tach is probably off. Even the big blocks that run steep props dont under turn by more than a few hundred RPM. A 351w would be propped to turn very close to 1:1 (speed vs. RPM). |
||
skidcl
Newbie Joined: September-09-2010 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Guys,
I agree the primary and secondaries are the same size on the 4160, but the jets are smaller in the primaries of my carb. In my stock 4160, about five years old, that is the way it came. It is obviously a square bore, not a spread bore carb. It has been a long time since I rebuilt the carb and checked the jets. I was surprised at the size difference. Speed wise, the best I can manage at my rpm max is about 45 mph. I never go there, so don't really care. I have always felt that the my Dominique is propped to be a water born tractor, not a speed machine. When I run with a vacuum gauge, 2600 rpm is about where I find my highest vacuum, best fuel economy and with weight towards the front, the best speed. It seems to be the natural sweet spot with this hull/engine/prop. Maintenance wise, I do have a Pertronic electronic igntion module which has lasted a long time, and I was replacing points every year as a precaution against breakdown. A MSD spark box has resulted in much easier starting and running with slightly overrich jetting, preventing fouled plugs. I am at about 2400 feet above sea level, not quite at the threshhold for leaner jetting (3000 feet above sea level per Holley). Both reduce maintenance for me. If memory serves my prop is a 13 X 13, and my transmission is a B/W 72C, the heavier duty, higher horsepower one that was standard on the Barefoot model. Different props, clean or dirty hulls, water flow over the prop, propeller efficiency and transmission slippage are factors that vary by boat and affect speed. I think the context of the stringer repair was whether to buy a boat that needed new stringers. I have seen first hand Correct Crafts getting new stringers, and decided that I would do it to my boat, but I think we would agree it is a major project. I would not recommend paying the nominal full price for a boat that needed new stringers. I can only report my own experiences with the boat, which I believe was asked. I think my information was correct as I posted it. |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you do in fact have a 4160, then it does not have jets on the rear (secondaries) at all- they came with metering plates with non-replaceable jets. If you have a 4150 or other carb with jets in the rear, then the reason they are larger than the front is because the front has a power valve, which will flow the equivalent of ~6 jet sizes when activated.
I have no doubt based on your post that you are not purposely spreading false information. That being said, there is enough Correct Craft knowledge on this site to know that something is incorrect about the numbers youre reporting. The 351w is propped to turn ~4400 RPM at WOT from the factory, which makes your 45mph right in the ballpark. At 2600 RPM, you would be running in the 25-27mph range. It sounds as though your tach is reading wrong- possibly as a result of all your ignition modifications? |
||
skidcl
Newbie Joined: September-09-2010 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I will accept all comments with appreciation.
Holley does make a conversion kit, 41-6, to convert the secondary metering plates to jets. Mine was converted when I had a speed shop rebuilt the carb. Having done so, I don't think there is any advantage to this. As I think about it, I believe you are right about the rpm and the electrical issues. I have never checked the accuracy of the tach. I believe it is original. To my recollection, it triggers from the MSD box, but I would think after 23 years, the jeweled movement might be a problem, connections corroded, etc, and I am thinking that the tach would probably read low. Thanks for pointing this out. |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ahh, so you have converted yours. This comment made me think it was all-original.
Im not familiar with the 41-6. I have the 34-6 in my 600cfm 4160 (351w) and the 34-13 in my 750cfm 4160 (454). I wonder how it compares. There is certainly no advantage to converting the secondaries to a metering block with replaceable jets unless you plan to dial the boat in to the nth degree. Often times this is a good practice when modifying the motor significantly with higher flowing parts (heads/intake/cam) to ensure youre not overly fat (underperforming) or too lean (potential for damage). For a largely stock engine, theres really no reason to deviate from the stock jetting that the rear plate would provide. Do confirm your tach readings with a known good tach. My bet is that youre right around the 1:1 speed vs. RPM like most other 351w/13x13 CC's. |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dave, I'd say the chances are greater that it's your EI conversion that's goofing up the tach and not age. My 1954 and 1964 are fine! The one in my 1977 is new but the tach worked before I replaced all the gauges. Hook up the shop tach and see what you're turning. |
||
Bri892001
Grand Poobah Joined: September-27-2008 Location: Boston MA Status: Offline Points: 4947 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
My brother had an MSD on his Checkmate with Chevy small block. I know he had trouble using a traditional timing light with it because of (Edit: the way) it worked. I wonder if this could mess with the tach a little too. They deliver spark a little differently, right?
|
||
kinggGordon
Newbie Joined: June-11-2011 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
yap !
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |