93 Moomba Boomerang??? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
AWhite70
Senior Member Joined: March-05-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: September-26-2005 at 12:05pm |
A relative of mine is looking at a '93 Moomba Boomerang and has asked me for some advice. I have no experience with these boats so I was wondering if anyone on here knew much about them. I've heard the new Moomba's are good boats for the price but I don't know about the old ones.
The engine is a PCM 351 so I know it should be solid, the rest I don't know about. Has anyone drive, ridden, ski'd behind one of these? What is the handling, tracking, and wake like? My first advice of course was buy a Nautique instead, but I probably need a little more. Thanks |
|
79nautique
Guest |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
A friend of mine bought one this past season and I guess they are the exact same haul as the supra's and are made by them as well. He said they are trimed out differently without as many bells and whistles thus the lower cost. I'm not sure if this applies to all yrs but the late models are. The only thing I never liked about the moomba's is that the freeboard on the sides is very low and the motor box looks huge sticking out of it. All in all your buying the motor and looking at the wake characteristics. Me personally I would rather own a CC but not everyone's budget is the same.
|
|
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Supra/Moomba (Skier's choice now owns and operates both companies) did not begin using the same hull for both boats until 1997.
The early Moomba Boomerang's are a unique and strange boat. As suggested, the freeboard is very low. More like an outboard or jetboat than an inboard. The engine box sits 50% above the gunnel. Second, the rudder mechanism sits outside the transom of the boat and goes down through the swim platform. The boat handles "differently" somewhere between an outboard and an inboard. It does back up better than a typical inboard. Third, this was a price point boat. It cost less than 10K new. The upholstery is very cheap. The back seat is just a block of foam covered with vinyl. The windshield is just a frameless piece of fiberglass. Guages are minimal. Pulling a skier in good conditions, the boat is fine. Decent wake, etc. Put it in rough water and it's all over. The boat is practically useless for wakeboarding. Unless your buddy is getting the for for a couple grand or less, there are lots of better inboards out there. BKH |
|
Livin' the Dream
|
|
jbear
Grand Poobah Joined: January-21-2005 Location: Lake Wales FL. Status: Offline Points: 8193 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
AS usual BKH has all the facts. Don't know how ya do it. Hope all is goin well. Remember, Friends don't let friends drive junk. It only costs a few dollars more to go top shelf.
|
|
"Loud pipes save lives"
AdamT sez "I'm Canadian and a beaver lover myself"... |
|
63 Skier
Grand Poobah Joined: October-06-2006 Location: Concord, NH Status: Offline Points: 4269 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That's a classic, I love it! |
|
'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
|
|
Riley
Grand Poobah Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7957 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Moomba was an Australian company before Supra or Skiers Choice bought it. A place in Maine was selling them when they first came out and I was told that rudder set up was how they did it down under. They appear to be a cheap, bare bones boat. I loved them when they first came out, mainly due to the price and that they were different. If it is in good condition and the price is right, it's probably a good entry level boat.
|
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
i dont like the shallow freeboard either, reminds me of a stars and stripes, needs to be higher than your knees
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
Jones
Senior Member Joined: September-07-2010 Location: Boise Status: Offline Points: 249 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I skied behind one years ago. It seemed really cheaply built. The pull was good but the wake was deceptive. It looked incredibly flat but very hard when you crossed it.
|
|
1979 Ski Nautique (sold)
1997 Ski Nautique 1998 Super Sport Nautique |
|
storm34
Grand Poobah Joined: November-03-2008 Location: Dexter Iowa Status: Offline Points: 4493 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Like mentioned several times above, they were built cheap and an entry level boat. Keeping that in mind, they are wood stringer boats and I would assume they are going to face the same problems as any CC with wood stringers. It would be my guess that you would see stringer rot on a Moomba way before you would see it on a CC.
They are cool looking boats, and hold true to that 'hot rod' ski boat feel from the 70s and 80s. If I had a chance to pick one up for really cheap I might think about it. But a CC is going to be a much better all around boat. |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
FYI guys, this thread was recently bumped to the top by a spammer... it originally dates back to 2005.
|
|
kapla
Grand Poobah Joined: March-27-2008 Location: BA, Argentina Status: Offline Points: 6148 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Exactly!! LOL I was curious on how it was brought out!!! back from the past! |
|
<a href="">1992 ski nautique
|
|
Jones
Senior Member Joined: September-07-2010 Location: Boise Status: Offline Points: 249 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
1979 Ski Nautique (sold)
1997 Ski Nautique 1998 Super Sport Nautique |
|
storm34
Grand Poobah Joined: November-03-2008 Location: Dexter Iowa Status: Offline Points: 4493 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
...still think they are cool boats!
|
|
Downward32
Newbie Joined: September-15-2013 Location: WA Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I bought a 92 Moomba Boomerang this summer and aside from the low freeboard the thing rocks forthe money. The wake is adequate for a beginer and with a 300 lbs fat sack in the back it has a substantially better wake. Not buch for extra bells and whistles, but again, the price is lower than the Supra.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |