Forums
NautiqueParts.comGet Your 2025 CCF Calendar Now
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 2015 GMC Canyon
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

2015 GMC Canyon

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
P71_CrownVic View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: July-07-2008
Location: SD
Status: Offline
Points: 534
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote P71_CrownVic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 2015 GMC Canyon
    Posted: January-12-2014 at 7:03am


Looks like I won't be a Ram owner for long. This is an absolutely stunning truck. This really shows how incredibly stupid Ford was for insisting that the size of the F150 isn't the issue, it's the weight. So while Ford will be letting their customers deal with the headaches of beta testing their aluminum experiment with tiny, high strung, gas guzzling engines, GM will be printing cash with these.

The Colorado is stunning enough but the Canyon is yet another step up.

Hopefully Dodge will do extremely well with the eco diesel and with the small twins from GM, we can knock Ford off of their best selling vehicle for 30 odd years (because of fleet sales) high horse!

Linky!
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 11:19am
LOL, great post.

I assume GM put a new grill on a Tacoma and called it a new truck? Looks like a clone both inside and out!



Not that its such a bad thing- the Tacoma is a great truck. I have 2 buddies that own them, and they strike a nice balance in size for tighter communities (both live/lived just outside some big cities) and capabilities. And dead nuts reliabile to boot. Not sure the GM offerings will match them in that last regard though. Joe had a good take on the American small/midsize trucks recently:

Originally posted by JoeinNY JoeinNY wrote:

The fall of the small truck was caused ultimately by the lack of increasing fuel efficiency standards.   Or alternately their prominence in the mid seventies through early nineties was the result of said regulations, combined with the second tier product management and marketing.   The full size trucks are always going to have the advantage of high volume in the US due to the commercial users. That volume allows them to tool up to the point that the extra 8-900 lbs of material in the full size truck doesn’t make it cost any more to design and build per piece than the small truck. Absent the need to sell the smaller platforms to average out the number of larger trucks they were selling the auto companies would much rather sell you a larger truck with the higher profit margin. The larger trucks therefore get all the design effort.. the little truck platforms that were actually pretty nice in the mid eighties got nothing more exciting than new body panels or required safety/emissions updates.   The big trucks got better and pretty soon you got just as good mileage with the big truck as the little truck, the prices were pretty close, parts for the big ones are cheaper, resale for the big ones better…   The last Colorado is what happens when you take your B-team product development staff and tell them to produce a new platform quickly and cheaply. Reliability and efficiency take time and skill to produce and are hard to market, bigger and more horsepower are easier and quicker – Marketing groups think everyone is Tim the toolman Taylor.   

Then when it doesn’t sell they learn the wrong lessons… oh no boss it’s not that we built a crappy truck it’s just that that segment of the market is dead, or the engineers made it cost too much- yeah that’s it.


It will be interesting to see if GM has learned their lesson and actually engineered some goodness into their new smaller pickups. Previous to his Tacoma, my buddy bought a '04 Ranger (new) and boy, that thing was a real peach.

I do have to thank you for making me look at the new F150 though, which debuted today. Extensive use of aluminum in the body for '15 that lowers weight by 700 lbs... increasing its towing and hauling capacities as well as increasing its fuel efficiency. Aluminum wont dent as easily and wont corrode (rust) like steel. Sounds like a win/win/win to me! I believe you are misusing the "high strung" terminology to describe their Ecoboost engine offerings. In a few more years we should have a pretty good idea how they hold up over time. I am more concerned with the increasing complexity of Ford's electrical systems and how many vehicle functions are built into the GUI at the dash. Great when it works and might be expensive to replace when it doesnt... but time will tell on that as well.
Back to Top
phatsat67 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: March-13-2006
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 6157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote phatsat67 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 12:29pm
Tim, I am terrified how hard/expensive some of these electronically advanced vehicles will be to repair in the future.

That is a better looking truck than the full size Chevy/GMC. If I could buy a mid size truck that had excellent fuel economy and good enough towing capacity all the while saving gobs of cash on the retail side of things I would do it but I still don't see the price difference being enough to sway people away from a bigger more comfy cab and higher towing capacities.
Back to Top
phatsat67 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: March-13-2006
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 6157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote phatsat67 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 12:33pm
Oh Jesus, I didn't think Ford ever could have made the F150 uglier. Wait, they did. Interior looks like a nice step up from 14 though.
Back to Top
quinner View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-12-2005
Location: Unknown
Status: Offline
Points: 5828
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote quinner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 12:38pm
Timmy, more kool aide, lol

You have got to be kidding when you say GM is copying a jap pickupcar, your kool aide must be spiked cuz you are confused and you have that bacerds.

Find it funny you regularly state GM SUV/Pickups have such poor reliability yet have never actually owned one, oh wait, it was one of your buds who drives a femmeyota that told you, LOL.

Take off your skirt and buy that Ford or GM pickup already!!
Back to Top
Riley View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-19-2004
Location: Portland, ME
Status: Offline
Points: 7957
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Riley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 12:57pm
Originally posted by quinner quinner wrote:

Timmy, more kool aide, lol

You have got to be kidding when you say GM is copying a jap pickupcar, your kool aide must be spiked cuz you are confused and you have that bacerds.

Find it funny you regularly state GM SUV/Pickups have such poor reliability yet have never actually owned one, oh wait, it was one of your buds who drives a femmeyota that told you, LOL.

Take off your skirt and buy that Ford or GM pickup already!!


LOL! Chris, I guess you could say that Toyotas are a metro truck.   
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 1:06pm
Originally posted by quinner quinner wrote:

Timmy, more kool aide, lol

You have got to be kidding when you say GM is copying a jap pickupcar, your kool aide must be spiked cuz you are confused and you have that bacerds.

Find it funny you regularly state GM SUV/Pickups have such poor reliability yet have never actually owned one, oh wait, it was one of your buds who drives a femmeyota that told you, LOL.

Take off your skirt and buy that Ford or GM pickup already!!

Japanese manufacturers like Toyota and Mazda certainly did pioneer the compact pickup segment, so Im not sure what youre refuting. Did you look at any of the pictures or spec sheets comparing the new Canyon/Colorado to the current gen Tacoma? One only need look as far as the US sales figures over the last 10 years to understand why GM has the Tacoma in their crosshairs. Clearly theyre not trying to emulate what Dodge has done with the Dakota! The domestic compact offerings have been pretty lackluster for a long time, for all the reasons Joe stated above. Hopefully the latest GM's will be better... but theyre certainly not breaking any new ground that I can see.

I dont drink any automotive flavored koolaid, I just buy the best vehicles that fit my needs. All things being equal, I'd buy American, but the segments Ive shopped in the past did not have American offerings that were up to snuff with the competition. I fully expect that to change when it comes time to buy a full size pickup... that playing field looks pretty darn level to me (and I really like what I see coming out of GM and Ford). An Ecoboost powered aluminum F150 looks pretty good on paper! Dont worry though, the 4Runner will probably stay, as its aging much more gracefully than the GF's Escape that is a year newer and has half the miles.   So we can still compare how the 4Runner stacks up against your Tahoe in a few years.
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 2:04pm
Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:


Extensive use of aluminum in the body for '15 that lowers weight by 700 lbs... increasing its towing and hauling capacities as well as increasing its fuel efficiency. Aluminum wont dent as easily and wont corrode (rust) like steel. Sounds like a win/win/win to me! I believe you are misusing the "high strung" terminology to describe their Ecoboost engine offerings. In a few more years we should have a pretty good idea how they hold up over time. I am more concerned with the increasing complexity of Ford's electrical systems and how many vehicle functions are built into the GUI at the dash. Great when it works and might be expensive to replace when it doesnt... but time will tell on that as well.


Aluminum does corrode and does dent easy and is harder to repair once damaged,not everyone has the skills to repair it yet.I for one would not be anxious to do their R&D for them.English cars have been using it for decades,the most famous to us here is the AC Cobra, even my 59 MG has the doors,trunk and hood skinned in aluminum.
As to electrical systems you guy's know the trouble we had with the Lincoln that Ford could not repair,I cannot imagine what you would do if it affected the running of the vehicle.
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 2:31pm
Gary, aluminum does corrode but nothing like steel. We're going to see a lot of marketing to address perceptions exactly like the ones you mention, including the reference to the use of "aerospace grade" aluminum coming out of the Ford camp. Its a commonly used material in Aerospace and Defense and doesnt have the same negative connotation that people apparently have with it in the automotive world. I saw one comment today along the lines of it featuring "Bud can sheet metal" that made me laugh. Apparently Ford started their R&D long ago, as they debuted several aluminum bodied cars with Jag and Land Rover when they owned those brands 10 years ago. I guess theyve been making hoods and other select body panels for main stream vehicles (F150, Mustang, etc) for a while as well. I also read that they had made a number of previous gen F150's using aluminum bodies and provided them to companies to test- not telling them what was different about them. So it doesnt appear that Ford has taken the change lightly. Of course, I wont be buying one of the first ones off the lot, but this move is pretty encouraging.

As far as repair goes, there are a number of luxury brands (Merc, Audi, Tesla, etc) in addition to Jag and LR that are using aluminum bodies... so theres definitely knowledge out there on how to repair it. That said, it doesnt take much damage these days for them to scrap an entire panel and install a new one... so nothing new there.
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 2:58pm
Yes the high end body shops have the knowledge but you won't be seeing Allstate,Geico,State Farm etc sending Fords to them,they will go to the cheapest places like Sterling,Maico--
I personally think the way to go was the original Saturn method of body panels or the plastic composite panels that were used by Jeep,Ford and Volvo. I understand why they have to go to these extreem routes but I don't have to like it
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 3:22pm
Is it only a state law here in CT that the insurance companies cant tell you which body shop you have to use? They certainly have their preference but you ultimately can choose whoever you want to work on your car. I figured that was universal.

I dont know much about the plastic body panels employed by the companies you mentioned... but I assume they didnt take hold for a reason. Probably came down to cost, I imagine, like everything else.
Back to Top
phatsat67 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: March-13-2006
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 6157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote phatsat67 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 3:31pm
Saturn always used plastic panels save the hood and trunk. My truck I believe has an aluminum hood. It's taken several rocks large enough to chip the paint pretty badly with no dents so far fingers crossed. So the aluminum may still corrode eventually but I bed it would probably double or triple the service life on non galvanized steel panels.
I mean look at the engine cradle in all of our boats. Thousands of hours in direct contact with water.

The only thing that worries me about aluminum and corrosion is that it seems to corrode more when the material is sealed and then breached by a chip (in the case of aluminum wheels that are clear coated). Maybe it was for cost reasons but most manufacturers have went by the way of plastic chrome wheels covers I would assume from the warranty issues found on coated aluminum rims. My roommates 12 Grand Cherokee has had one wheel replaced already and another on the way for that reason.
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-13-2014 at 6:58pm
Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:

Is it only a state law here in CT that the insurance companies cant tell you which body shop you have to use? They certainly have their preference but you ultimately can choose whoever you want to work on your car. I figured that was universal.


Your right we have that here too but say I run into your truck and cause 1000 damage.Your insurance cuts you a check for the 1000 and you decide to go to the high end shop instead of the one they recommend. Their shop charges 75 an hour for labor and yours charges 125. Your shop though has done alot of aluminium Audi's, their shop is still learning on your car. I made a mistake years ago buying a first year VW Quantum,it was so bad that I'd walk before I ever buy another VW or a first year car.They were the only cars I owned until '91
Bottom line is Ford is not doing this out of the goodness of their heart or to push the envelope of design or manufacturing.Easy now to see why they bought Aston,Jaguar and Volvo was to get their expertise of building with exotic materials and turbo charged engines. Their customers demand a certain size and power truck,the government has demanded a certain fuel mileage and Ford does not want to lose that customer base
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2025 | Bagley Productions, LLC