Nautique Club 200

My backseat is removed about 80% of the time . More room for gear - fatsacs etc. I also like the lack of bells and whistles also . Keep it simple .

scotchipman wrote: The new 200 is finally up on their web page, looks sweet! Now I want to know if the hull is changed or not from the old 200? They make it sound like it is not the same hull as the old 200? https://www.nautique.com/models/nautique-200

Nice with one exception. Pulling the TUBE!!!

Skip the tube step altogether and go straight to the skis

Lots of wasted interior/floor space with that deck

I like it. Surprised it weighs in at a whopping 3400 lbs.

Seems odd they didn't use up any of the storage that is clearly blocked off by the gigantic white fiberglass interior sides where pockets would normally be. It does look more ski boaty without the side storage pods in the rear.

8122pbrainard wrote: Riley wrote: looking at their phones. . That's for sure.

I can’t stand this. Kids are no longer raised by parents but rather IPads.
I’m with most, the deck has killed a lot of space. I feel like my 93 has a better setup. Also feel like this is a Sport Nautique all over again but maybe that’s what they were shooting for. But it definitely looks better than the 2019 Stealth Bomber Ski Nautique.

Bri892001 wrote: About the only occasional regret I have with my 93 is the lack of a rear seat. Although, the floor space there makes more room for gear. And, it's also not getting stepped on when people are getting on and off the boat after skiing etc. I got a portable seat from West Marine and I throw that in there on the rare occasions we really need it..

My 93 has a portable jump seat that I’ve only seen in one other 93. I love it. Without I have more open space than any SN I’ve been in then that once or twice a year I need a back seat I drop it in and it doesn’t look universal or out of place. Upholstery lines look like a normal 93 back seat.

^^^ from what I understand Stealth Nautique is tournament approved, 200 is not.

From what I now understand both are tournament approved.

I like what I see. Not as bare bones as Ken said, but like the comments above that, a super bare bones boat probably wouldnt sell real well, like the 93. This may be a good boat for serious skiers who dont have the 1oo Gs for a new "Ski Nautique" Like Brian said, a lot will hinge on price. If its too high, the non 100 K skiers will opt for used boats. Will have to be a pretty reasonable savings from the stealth bomber. Maybe it will be a similar relationship like between the 210/230 and the Gs. Everyone wants a G, but some people get the 210/230 for pricing purposes. Me, if I had the dough and was interested in a wake boat would probably get the 210 anyway. Too old school for the barge lines of the Gs.

Gary S wrote: I do like drivers seat, phone books are impossible to find now days. Will not be lower than 80k

Not below $90k.
Signed;
Bob Barker
Price is Right

Yeah, 79,000 base pricing. Likely doesn't include destination fees or trailer.

They picked a humdinger of a color scheme for the main advertising boat, looks basically all white when in the water and was the #1 boat N3 had in inventory the longest of any. Everyone just looked at it then said "Nah I will order my own". Which was all of about 3 buyers.

I think it was a 12 we finally sold in 2015. Even Mars man passed on it back then IIRC.

KENO wrote: It's kind of a porker It looks like it weighs 550 pounds more than the 2018 SN 200    3400 vs 2850 pounds dry weight

The tower is standard? That the extra weight?.................

Did the closed bow version save that much weight? Does carbon fiber or lack thereof cause that much weight differential?

With a nearly 20% weight gain, I wonder what that’s going to do to the wake.