Max Ballast weight in my 78 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
petermuhic
Groupie Joined: July-13-2010 Location: Toronto Ontario Status: Offline Points: 50 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: August-11-2010 at 10:28pm |
i was just wondering, i am thinking of buying a ballast fat sac kit for my 1978 ski nautique, it contains a two bag set up/ Each bag is 60" long and 15" in diameter. i was thinking of putting one bag on each side of ther motor to weight down the boat for a bigger wake. Each bag weights 350lbs,
what im asking is,, do you think its a good idea to have these bags sitting on the stringers? because i have never openeed up the bottom of my boat, it seams very solid but i have no idea of how it is constructed and if it can take that weight.... thanks.. any input would help./ |
|
petermuhic
Groupie Joined: July-13-2010 Location: Toronto Ontario Status: Offline Points: 50 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
has anyone ever used these weight bags on there older ski nautiques?
|
|
SN206
Grand Poobah Joined: February-25-2009 Location: Fort Worth, TX Status: Offline Points: 2339 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Some people have, some people think it not necessary. I think your talking about 766.1 lbs of addition, which would be pushing if not exceeding reccomended total combine weight. Johny Law looks for things like that. It's your vessel and you're the Capt., so do what you want. |
|
...those who have fallen and those who will.
|
|
bkhallpass
Grand Poobah Joined: March-29-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4723 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You'll be fine. Lots of people running sacs on both sides of the motor box.
If you want to see the construction under your floor, do a search on stringer repair threads. A there have been a couple on boats of your vintage and you'll see what it looks like under there from the factory. BKH |
|
Livin' the Dream
|
|
petermuhic
Groupie Joined: July-13-2010 Location: Toronto Ontario Status: Offline Points: 50 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
alright,, thanks,, i know the newer boats alot of guys run with bags but i havent seen the older ones with it. Cause i want to produce a bigger wake for wakeboarding..
Oh and johny law doesnt affect me on the small lakes i wakeboard on, we dont hit the bigger lakes cause the small ones are more private, secluded, usually GLASS and have no cops, they have no reason to be there really. just wanted to know if the boat can handle it. |
|
ncdoubleup
Senior Member Joined: August-08-2010 Location: Statesville, NC Status: Offline Points: 164 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We had a 78 and ran 2 fat sacks and never had any problems. The floor and the stringers were new, but never had any problems. They will create a fantastic wake.
Good luck, have fun & be safe!!! |
|
horkn
Platinum Member Joined: September-10-2007 Location: Cedarburg, Wi Status: Offline Points: 1511 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My 78 martinique has the same hull as your SN.
I usually add 1 large (600 lb IIRC) fat sac in place of the rear seat bottom, but I have added two, one bigger and one smaller 350 lb side sac in back. If I had 2 side sacs, I would have probably tried that combo too. Now I do have a redone floor, all plywood and it's definitely heavier than the stock stuff was. I did even run a fat sac or 2 when I ran it for a brief time before redoing the floor and interior. You'll be fine. |
|
78 martinique- refloored, reinforced, stringers re glassed, re engineered interior
GT40P heads Edelbrock Performer intake acme 4 blade http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v64/horkn/fish/nautique.jpg |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |