3 vs 4 blade |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | ||
mrinboard ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November-23-2010 Location: Columbia City Status: Offline Points: 165 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: December-17-2010 at 9:05am |
|
Hey guys need some help Im going to be buying a new prop over the winter and I wanted some feedback on what is the better prop 3 or 4 balde I have a 1994 ski nautique we us it for slalom skiing and footing
Thanks, Mr. Inboard |
||
Dont Hate "ACCELERATE!"
|
||
![]() |
||
8122pbrainard ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Mark,
Roughly, the # 3 topic here in the forums is proping you boat. Do a search and start reading!! You WOT RPM would be great to know too. If someone is directing you to a 4 blade, they most likely are not informed on the latest 3 blade props. (or, they have a 4 blade they want to sell!! ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Hollywood ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: February-04-2004 Location: Twin Lakes, WI Status: Offline Points: 13523 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If 4 blades is better than 3 why not go for 5?
|
||
![]() |
||
emccallum ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August-08-2006 Location: Clarks Hill SC Status: Offline Points: 1084 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
On my 95 snob with a 1.23:1 tranny and the standard motor I am running the Acme 470 three blade. Smooth as glass. It is a great prop for skiing. It will pull your arms off, and I have pulled up 5-6 folks on slalom with little effort. I do think I have lost a bit of top end, but I rarely run it WOT for very long. As before, lots of info here on props. Start reading, and weighing the pros and cons for each one! A new CNC'd prop will be a lot better than any old one.
|
||
![]() |
||
Fl Inboards ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-20-2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2160 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
We actually tested a five blade one time. bottom line is the five blade needs rpm to be utilzed that our inboards canot atain. The out board and stern drive industry utilizes them. I like four blades over three for our application. they do run smoother and their is no turn growell with them. I even run a hand build SS OJ four blade on my old v-drive that out performs anything else I tried. |
||
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.
1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0 |
||
![]() |
||
horkn ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September-10-2007 Location: Cedarburg, Wi Status: Offline Points: 1511 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've been very impressed with my CNC acme 208 4 blade. I will probably buy a 540 to see how that stacks up to the 208 I have to really compare 3 to 4 blades, in a very much like for like with almost no other variables than the number of blades.
|
||
78 martinique- refloored, reinforced, stringers re glassed, re engineered interior
GT40P heads Edelbrock Performer intake acme 4 blade http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v64/horkn/fish/nautique.jpg |
||
![]() |
||
adamt ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July-18-2007 Location: Orlando, FL Status: Offline Points: 927 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Why stop at five ![]() ![]() |
||
-Adam
1973 Skier |
||
![]() |
||
Luchog ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: April-17-2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 2135 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think you'll be happier with a 4 blade, they seem to lift the stern a little more smoothing the wake.
I have a new cnc 3 blade on my boat and I'm looking forward to try a custom made 4 blade. |
||
![]() |
||
mslitti ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: October-13-2009 Location: Detroit, Mi Status: Offline Points: 155 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Nice 5 blade, I have one on both of my Mercury Racing #6 speedmaster outdrives, But a do not think the person wanted to spend $6000 on that prop. Lol
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
adamt ![]() Gold Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July-18-2007 Location: Orlando, FL Status: Offline Points: 927 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Look again, it's a SIX blade!!! ![]() |
||
-Adam
1973 Skier |
||
![]() |
||
storm34 ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: November-03-2008 Location: Dexter Iowa Status: Offline Points: 4496 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ernest, do you have a GT-40 in your SNOB? We're looking to get a new prop this spring and are debating between a 3 and 4 blade. I'm with Jody, I hate the growl the boat makes when turning with a 3 blade. Our 88 was smoother than any boat I've driven to date. Hoping to get our 96 to that point. |
||
![]() |
||
emccallum ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August-08-2006 Location: Clarks Hill SC Status: Offline Points: 1084 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I do not have the gt-40. I havent really noticed much growling, but, I really havent compared the 470 to a good CNC'd 4 blade. DOnt get me thinking about growling!! Ignorance is bliss. My buddy has a 470 on his snob (with the GT 40 motor) and his boat just isnt as smooth as mine. We have aligned it and check everything we could think of. I think some hulls just run better than others.
|
||
![]() |
||
mdvalant ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: May-06-2009 Location: Bellevue, IA Status: Offline Points: 2059 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I enjoy my blades of 4, personally. Everyone has their favorites though.
|
||
![]() |
||
TRBenj ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The old school cast 3-blades that came on the early 90's Nautiques are the only ones Ive actually heard/felt growl like youre describing, Chris. They do it in a hard turn only- I believe a hard left turn will induce it. Sound about right? Keith's '94 did this with the 3-blade OJ. The new-school 3-blades dont do anything like that. They make a *touch* more noise than the 4-blades, but I wouldnt call it a "growl". More of a very slight "chugging" that you notice at skiing speeds. Most people wouldnt notice the difference unless you ran a 3-blade right after the 4-blade though. The CNC 3's are still light years ahead of any of the cast props (3's and 4's alike) in terms of smoothness, not to mention performance. 4 blades are usually the prop of choice with the HO 351's with the 1.23, but that has more to do with the props available than it does with 3 vs. 4 blades. No one makes a 3-blade CNC prop with more than 15" of pitch, and the more powerful motors that are only meant to turn 4800-5000 need a bit more than that to keep the revs in check. The non-HO boats, on the other hand, will usually see better performance from a 3-blade, as there are a number of props to choose from in the 11-14" pitch range. |
||
![]() |
||
Watarski ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: January-10-2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 78 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've got to swap to a LH prop (have an Acme 542 now). I'm probably going with another 3 blade based off everything I've read here. Does anyone know if Delta Propeller is doing a sale like they did last Winter?
|
||
1985 Ski Nautique 2001
|
||
![]() |
||
TRBenj ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Go to the "Links" section on CCF- we have a standing 20% discount with Delta.
|
||
![]() |
||
Watarski ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: January-10-2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 78 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thank you sir! Need to order that 543 pronto...
|
||
1985 Ski Nautique 2001
|
||
![]() |
||
east tx skier ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August-22-2006 Location: Tyler, TX Status: Offline Points: 248 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I had an Acme 541 on my old MC that growled like crazy when you bought the boat off plane. Great performance, but a bit noisy. Love the 422 on my 98 Ski.
|
||
![]() |
||
Fl Inboards ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-20-2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2160 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Now Craig why would you go and do that when Florida Inboards everyday price is 20% off on any OJ product. I tell ya what Christmas special OJ props 30% off for CCF subscribers/members, sale ends Jan 31 2011. Better products for better prices at Florida Inboards Inc. |
||
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.
1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0 |
||
![]() |
||
TRBenj ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jody, does OJ make anything for an older (1:1) CC (12x13, 12x14, 13x13, 13x14, etc- RH obviously) in their XMP line? Or is the 13x15.5 4-blade for the 1.23:1 the only one they offer?
|
||
![]() |
||
Riley ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7966 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
30% off Acme, too? |
||
![]() |
||
Fl Inboards ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-20-2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2160 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Tim, Their is a complete line of 13" wheels readily available from OJ in all three lines of propeller XMP, Legend and Force, smaller dia wheels can be supplied upon request but of course their is a bit of an up-charge on special order props. 100% satisfaction guaranteed. The last one I had built was a 11.75X20 4blade SS Very fine quality and performance. Eric will build most anything anyone would want in a propeller.
Riley sorry no! Only OJ products. Merry Christmas to all!! Jody |
||
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.
1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0 |
||
![]() |
||
TRBenj ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jody, do you have a product list? The only 1" shaft RH XMP prop listed in their Application Guide is the 13x15.5 428. |
||
![]() |
||
Riley ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7966 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
On their XMP,(CNC line), my understanding is the OJ's have more meat on the blades than an Acme, so if I was considering going from a 13x12 in an Acme to a 13x12.625 in an Acme, a 13x12 OJ would be more similar to the Acme 13x12.625? I've been considering a different prop for our Malibu Sporster. It has the 310 carb engine. Manual states red line is 4800. It turns 5050 with even 3 people in it. It's got way more hole shot than it needs. I'm thinking a little more prop would be just as good or better all around and may increase top end slightly and better fuel economy for cruising. Does that sound right to you?
|
||
![]() |
||
TRBenj ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bruce, when the OJ's are described as "having more meat" on their blades, Im pretty sure thats in reference to the thickness- not the surface area. The Acmes have bigger blades (surface area wise), though not by a huge margin... both CNC styles have significantly more blade area than the old cast props. The only XMP Ive ever tried (430) was slightly bigger in diameter and had more cup than the Acme (422) I ran it back to back against, and thus the OJ ran about 300-400 fewer RPM. Thats the closest Ive been able to compare them apples to apples, but I would bet that if you could find 2 props with equivalent specs, the Acme vs. XMP would turn very similar RPM's.
|
||
![]() |
||
east tx skier ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August-22-2006 Location: Tyler, TX Status: Offline Points: 248 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
For comparison's sake on blade area, here's my old Acme 541 next to a comparable OJ XMP 13x12. Acme has a throwing star thing going for it.
|
||
![]() |
||
Riley ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7966 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Acme's are sort like clever blades. Did you notice any difference between the two?
|
||
![]() |
||
Fl Inboards ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-20-2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2160 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I see these are left hand unless the picture is inverted would any of the two be for sale provided they were left hand? And not Gold plated! ![]() |
||
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.
1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0 |
||
![]() |
||
TRBenj ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jody, Im pretty sure ETS let his lefty's go with his MC!
Any response to this?
Id really like to try an XMP on the BFN if a proper size exists. |
||
![]() |
||
Fl Inboards ![]() Grand Poobah ![]() ![]() Joined: January-20-2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2160 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Tim I would have to say that is an incomplete and overall rather vague application chart and will see if we can make it more complete and informative for future usage. As for your application more information is needed as always What Rpm are you running and is the motor stock? Any Hp upgrades? And also what is the overall desire? Top speed? Holding speed with a load? Out of the hole? And if you have any initial thoughts on what size you would like to try and will work for your application.
Keep in mind my price list comes as blade dia and three or four, Pitch is inconsequential for my purposes for pricing. We have been working on some stuff for the 200 even stepping up as high as a 14" wheel, though the project has been shelved for a few months. Thought I would ask ETS because I have a customer that could use a discounted used prop for an upcoming build. Also I am flush with right hand wheels for emergency customers but have no lefty's. |
||
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.
1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0 |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |