Forums
NautiqueParts.comSpring Sale 2025
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is this REALLY a ski nautique?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Is this REALLY a ski nautique?

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
dchris17 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-28-2005
Location: Weatherford, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 573
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dchris17 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Is this REALLY a ski nautique?
    Posted: August-21-2005 at 1:05am
Ski Nautique or Southwind
This boat is listed as a 1977 Ski Nautique on boat trader, but it looks like a Southwind to me. Note the step through windshield and the trim on the deck. Is it possible that it could be a Ski Nautique? I'm considering a trade with this guy and I want to know what it really is.

THANKS!
Back to Top
jbear View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-21-2005
Location: Lake Wales FL.
Status: Offline
Points: 8193
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jbear Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 1:45am
dchris; looks like a Southwind to me. Nice lookin' one tho. Whatever happened to that other deal you were tryin' for?
Back to Top
dchris17 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-28-2005
Location: Weatherford, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 573
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dchris17 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 1:57am
I'm still working on it, but the marina is playing games. I just updated the other forum.

My problem with owning a Southwind is that I really like to wakeboard. I don't know much about the Southwind, but it has a heckuva lot more draft than the Ski Nautique. I'm not sure what that will do to the wake.
Back to Top
jbear View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-21-2005
Location: Lake Wales FL.
Status: Offline
Points: 8193
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jbear Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 2:06am
dchris; Used to know a guy who did alot of footin' behind his Southwind and swore by the wake but don't know what some weight would do to the wake for boarding. You must have just updated the other forum as I just checked it eailier this evening.
Back to Top
dchris17 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-28-2005
Location: Weatherford, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 573
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dchris17 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 2:11am
I might trade with the guy. The wake's got to be better than the thing that's dragging me around the lake now. And it is a classic boat. We'll see.
Back to Top
82tique View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June-04-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 82tique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 3:50pm
Never been behind a sothwind, (or seen one in person for that matter)....being a direct drive boat it seems like it would throw a heck of a wake, plus it probably wouldn't beat the crap out of you on rough water....could have great potential.
take it for a test drive and post some pics of the wake!I bet it would be better than a mid ninties MC.
Back to Top
GottaSki View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: April-21-2005
Location: NE CT
Status: Offline
Points: 3372
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GottaSki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 4:20pm
Jeeze Louise, it took CC over 65 years to produce decent ski wake then most everyone wants big wake.
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."

River Rat to Mole
Back to Top
bkhallpass View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: March-29-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4723
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bkhallpass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 5:00pm
Originally posted by 82tique 82tique wrote:

being a direct drive boat it seems like it would throw a heck of a wake,


Hey 82.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me, but I don't think DD has much to do with size of wake. Wake size and shape has more to do with hull shape and width, and whether the boat is planing or partial planing. DD has more to do with power out of the hole, strength of pull, and the ability to maintain consistent speed, which are of course also very desirable traits in wakeboarding and waterskiing.

BKH
Livin' the Dream

Back to Top
S.T. View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: June-04-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 56
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote S.T. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 8:11pm
The running surface looks a lot like the Barefoot 2001s which, I have heard, have a very nice wake. The extra freeboard can only be a good thing when you start adding weight.

The teak walkway and the step-though windshield would be really useful in certain launch ramp and dock situations as well.

The only downside I see is that it probably doesn't have a swim platform and those can be pricey if you add an teak one.
Back to Top
dchris17 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-28-2005
Location: Weatherford, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 573
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dchris17 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 9:05pm
Originally posted by GottaSki GottaSki wrote:

Jeeze Louise, it took CC over 65 years to produce decent ski wake then most everyone wants big wake.


It's kind of a nice irony, don't you think, that the best ski boats in the world also happen to make great wakeboard boats!
Back to Top
Dank View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April-05-2005
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 296
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dank Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-21-2005 at 11:14pm
Originally posted by GottaSki GottaSki wrote:

Jeeze Louise, it took CC over 65 years to produce decent ski wake then most everyone wants big wake.


I think this is one of the reasons the older CCs are so popular. They hadn't nailed the slalom wake yet. The 90 and older seem to almost be more popular than the 90 - 2000 boats. Of course then they started making wakeboard specific boats and the wakes got bigger :)
"I don't know what the world may need, but a V8 engine's a good start for me"
Back to Top
Aussie Ken View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Aussie Ken Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-22-2005 at 12:19am
Chris - I think you would be better off looking for a ski nautique. The deep V is likely to cause the wake to crumble when loaded.
Back to Top
dchris17 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-28-2005
Location: Weatherford, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 573
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dchris17 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-22-2005 at 12:44am
I've come to the same conclusion. I have a deep-V right now (not a Correct Craft, I'm ashamed to admit) and it is hard to get a really sweet wake. My wife tells me this is the last boat swap I get to make for 5+ years, so I'm going to hold out for a mustang or ski nautique. Thanks to everyone for helping!
Back to Top
82tique View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June-04-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 82tique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-22-2005 at 2:00am
Originally posted by bkhallpass bkhallpass wrote:

Originally posted by 82tique 82tique wrote:

being a direct drive boat it seems like it would throw a heck of a wake,


Hey 82.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me, but I don't think DD has much to do with size of wake. Wake size and shape has more to do with hull shape and width, and whether the boat is planing or partial planing. DD has more to do with power out of the hole, strength of pull, and the ability to maintain consistent speed, which are of course also very desirable traits in wakeboarding and waterskiing.

BKH



All I said is that it could have potential....much more than a I/O or an outboard....relax...
Back to Top
bkhallpass View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: March-29-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4723
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bkhallpass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-22-2005 at 2:46am
Originally posted by 82tique 82tique wrote:

All I said is that it could have potential....much more than a I/O or an outboard....relax...


No worries at all. Not trying to be uptight
or critical. Just throwing it out there.

BKH


Livin' the Dream

Back to Top
David F View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: June-11-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1770
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David F Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August-22-2005 at 1:38pm
I have a '77 Martinique that I need to unload. I would like to get $5500.00 for it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2025 | Bagley Productions, LLC