Ski bindings mid 90s HO |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
Netdewt
Senior Member Joined: February-15-2010 Location: Minneapolis Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May-31-2016 at 1:19am |
|
I found an old ski in great shape on Craigslist for $75 and jumped on it. It's got double high wrap bindings which I have never used before, though I have been slalom skiing (not on a course) for at least 15 years. I couldn't get my feet into them as is, so I'm thinking I will adjust them before my next outing. Oddly, the bindings are an XL, and I did not see that before I picked it up. I didn't even realize they are so particularly sized. Will these work for me?
HO CDX-1 67" Double 98 X Large Me: 5'11" 170lb size 9 |
||
1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
||
aupatking
Senior Member Joined: October-03-2013 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Those boots may be fine. The XL sizes in the 98 were generally a 10-12, but no harm in taking a ride to see how they feel for you. Just take along some Dawn, slide your foot in-and-out, until you get it good and bubbly, and it will go right in. You'll just need to kick the ski around a bit to get the rest of the soap out, once you're in the water.
The only problem you're going to run into is if those boots are too big. HO, as well as everyone else went to an industry standard plate for the front boot, and an almost universal rear (D3 and HO have different rear hole patterns), somewhere around 2000. Those 98's are getting harder to find, and new boots don't fit on your ski without plate modifications. That CDX was a great ski for it's time |
||
02 SN 196 TSC2 ZO
01 SN 196 TSC1 98 SN 196 TSC1 97 SN 196 TSC1 93 SN 196 NWZ |
||
75 Tique
Grand Poobah Joined: August-12-2004 Location: Seven Lakes, NC Status: Offline Points: 6130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not sure what you mean by not being able to get into them. Too small? Can't imagine that. I have a 9 1/2 foot and an XL HO boot that I have for the same reason, it was a great deal. I find the XL very minimally sloppy for my 9 1/2 but certainly usable. You say you cant get into them? Did you try a little soap. Mine is a little bit of a struggle and at first I used some soap, but with the little bit of wiggle room, it felt loose, so I just fight a little harder to get into the wet, unsoaped boot. I wonder if you will like the double boot. I don't care for that arrangement. I have never owned one, and I suppose I could get used to it, but on the occasions I borrowed one, I didn't like being so locked in. (Plus its a lot easier (for me) to get up with my back foot out) My HO didn't come with a double boot but the rear binding did have a heel piece to it. I never even tried it. Took it off before I used it. Maybe I'll put it back on some day just to try it out.
|
||
_____________
“So, how was your weekend?” “Well, let me see…sun burn, stiff neck, screwed up back, assorted aches and pains….yup, my weekend was great, thanks for asking.” |
||
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
quinner
Grand Poobah Joined: October-12-2005 Location: Unknown Status: Offline Points: 5828 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
1 part Laundry Detergent to 2 parts water in a spray bottle.
If you decide you don't like the double boot replace it with a rear toe plate |
||
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Gel style shave cream is highly effective, washes out quickly and is cheap. It's been our go-to for many years. Other lubes I've tried persist too long (don't rinse easily).
|
||
Hollywood
Moderator Group Joined: February-04-2004 Location: Twin Lakes, WI Status: Offline Points: 13517 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
skutsch
Grand Poobah Joined: June-19-2008 Location: Racine, WI Status: Offline Points: 2874 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I will apologize in advance for the preaching to follow... ***************************WARNING: Soap Box Alert********************************************** I would switch to a rear toe plate anyway. I can't tell you the number of injuries I have seen with dual boots. Typically your front foot ejects leaving only your rear foot attached to the ski. Your rear foot can't control the ski, which then goes in any direction it wants mangling your rear leg. Best case you get a sprained ankle, worst case you break both tibia and fibula ****************************END Soap Box Alert******************************************************** Professional level skiers can disregard this message. BTW - FWIW Babes Boot Butter is 100% biodegradeable and all natural its main ingredient is Kelp |
||
75 Tique
Grand Poobah Joined: August-12-2004 Location: Seven Lakes, NC Status: Offline Points: 6130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Boot butter....Is that anything like crotch cheese?
|
||
_____________
“So, how was your weekend?” “Well, let me see…sun burn, stiff neck, screwed up back, assorted aches and pains….yup, my weekend was great, thanks for asking.” |
||
desertskier
Platinum Member Joined: December-19-2006 Location: Az Status: Offline Points: 1115 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Blamey
Gold Member Joined: August-18-2015 Location: White Plains,NY Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have one of these. Was just cleaning it up and inspecting it yesterday. I found it in the ski locker after buying my boat, along with a pair of combos that also looked like they are from the 90's. Last time I slalom skied was probably back in about 1994 so these would've been just the ski's to have.
Somebody above posted that they were good for their time, what would the difference be with a modern ski? How would these work for a beginner slalomer. Would the the MDX-1 be better than a the slalom ski from a pair of combos. Also, would I get much benefit from buy a modern pair of combos for anybody that wants to learn to ski or will the older pair be just fine. |
||
96 Super Sport
Previously: 95 Sport Nautique, 1980 Ski Supreme |
||
Blamey
Gold Member Joined: August-18-2015 Location: White Plains,NY Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Here is a pic of all three.
|
||
96 Super Sport
Previously: 95 Sport Nautique, 1980 Ski Supreme |
||
Hollywood
Moderator Group Joined: February-04-2004 Location: Twin Lakes, WI Status: Offline Points: 13517 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Older combos are fine.
Ride the CDX and then the "slalom" combo and see for yourself... |
||
skutsch
Grand Poobah Joined: June-19-2008 Location: Racine, WI Status: Offline Points: 2874 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Absolutely nothing wrong with those combo's. They are nice and wide, so they are GREAT for beginners. The width on the combo is also GREAT for learning slalom deeps.
No idea on the difference between that ski and today's ski. I kind of think that unless you are a serious course skier, you really wouldn't notice or gain much by moving to a "modern" ski. Again, others will know better than me. |
||
75 Tique
Grand Poobah Joined: August-12-2004 Location: Seven Lakes, NC Status: Offline Points: 6130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Here's where I usually go into my rant about a $1500 ski isn't going to make a beginning slalom skier any better, or even an intermediate recreational skier like myself. Is a 2014 era ski going to be better for a beginner than a 1990s ski. Nope. I will grant that the new wider, easy up, whatever, skis will make life easier for a beginner tho. But skis of comparable shape from the 90s to now, I don't think do much of anything for a beginner or intermediate skier. As far as using a "real" slalom ski vs half a combo for a beginning slalom skier, I would say absolutely. As soon as they master getting up and turning a little bit on one ski, get them a real slalom ski....even a 90s vintage one. That difference is huge, as far as stability.
|
||
_____________
“So, how was your weekend?” “Well, let me see…sun burn, stiff neck, screwed up back, assorted aches and pains….yup, my weekend was great, thanks for asking.” |
||
lcgordon
Gold Member Joined: June-24-2014 Location: Denver Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They have came along way with skis. It all depends what you want to do tho. Yes a 90s ski will work. They were running 39 off on them so yes you can run anything under that on them. If you just wanna free ski and ride the tail of the ski and throw big spray then any ski will work. I would recommend an actually slalom ski tho. A combo slalom would suck except for teaching deep water starts. If you are just starting in the course then a new beginner course ski will help you so much. Get something like a radar theory or something. If you are skis seriously in the course as in 34-36 mph then a newer ski will help you progress and make it alot easier. Not saying it cant be done but a new ski will help alot.
You dont need a brand new ski. Many decent skis can be bought on ski it again for 200-400 bucks. If you want to ski in the course I personally would have somebody that skis in the course help with a ski choice. Somebody at your local shop would probably not be the best person to ask. Chances are they wakeboard and dont slalom and want to sell you stuff. |
||
AAM196
Gold Member Joined: October-23-2012 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
well if you are serious skier you really have to demo esp if you are dropping a grand or so... that is what we did in the late 80s and I ended up with a Jobe 1600 that I used for years. Now I did take a chance for $600 or whatever on a Strada with boots of ski-it-again and I love it... but I only got a killer deal on a ski like that because someone didn't demo it and went a different way.
All that said, Larry is 100% correct... a $150 ski or board etc off ski it again is prob more than adequate for most people (maybe not their ego).. As far as for old highwraps... cheap shaving cream or my favorite heavily diluted dish soap. |
||
Blamey
Gold Member Joined: August-18-2015 Location: White Plains,NY Status: Offline Points: 631 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks for the replys. Looks like these will do just fine until I know what I'm doing.
|
||
96 Super Sport
Previously: 95 Sport Nautique, 1980 Ski Supreme |
||
Netdewt
Senior Member Joined: February-15-2010 Location: Minneapolis Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Oof. Now I'm nervous. I've always used a toe plate but I get up with my foot in. I'm right handed but I've always gone right foot forward. I'm not so confident in my deal anymore. Where can I find a toe plate that fits the mount pattern? These seem common enough, maybe I can find someone to trade for large size boots. I was trying to get them on in the lake. I've never heard of using soap to get them on before. I've always had bindings with Velcro. |
||
1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
||
aupatking
Senior Member Joined: October-03-2013 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you're a free skier, that CDX will never treat you bad. I ski the course twice a week, more if i can. I'm on a D3 Quest 45 and it's a huge difference between old tech and new, as far as speed, especially holding speed through the turn and cross course speed. If you're trying to ski the slalom course, go newer technology. If not, stick with what you've got. It's a good ski.
I dug up a couple good condition HO 96's. One's a large. I'd trade you if you want to cover shipping. I just like keeping them around if anyone wants to ride an older ski (I've got several old HOs). As far as injuries go, nothing is safe, some things are safer. I broke my ankle bad, 2 years ago in Goode Powershells, and do not suggest them to anyone at any level, but there are a lot of people that disagree. I use the Reflex system now with their R-Style rear half boot and that has saved me at least twice. Your combos are fine for beginners, the new ones aren't much different at all. |
||
02 SN 196 TSC2 ZO
01 SN 196 TSC1 98 SN 196 TSC1 97 SN 196 TSC1 93 SN 196 NWZ |
||
Orlando76
Grand Poobah Joined: May-21-2013 Location: Mount Dora, FL Status: Offline Points: 3108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm a 13.5 if they made it. I use an HO Animal binding 12/13 front which is really their old XL, Radar 13/14 Vector "sneaker" style binding rear kept loosely cinched. With a brand new Animal binging it's so tight I can only stand 4 passes without pain but after a month it stretches out enough. I want no slop in my front binding. We always use Publix Free and Clear/Mild and Gentle type white dish soap, undiluted. Any dye and blah blah free type dish soap for sensitive people or babies will work good. It's gentle on the bindings and washes away by the time I pull out for the gate. Gel shave cream works just as good but I'm always worried about rust stains from the bottle.
The debate of safety with double bindings vs toe plate will go on forever, it's like Chevy vs Ford. I feel doubles is safer in general. For some reason I can pull out easier from my death grip Animal than I do my loose Vector when I kick my stick off after a set. If you're free skiing then a looser binding probably won't matter much. If it's too tight lube it up, it'll stretch out, lol. I'm going to go against the flow here and say if you're going to ski the course, as a beginner, spend as much money as you can on a ski that that works well for you. No sense on learning the course on a ski then having to learn it again on a higher end ski. Obviously a good ski for joe may not work for bob. When I started out the course I Demo'd nearly every ski made under $900. Went with the Radar Senate Alloy. Probably the hottest ski for early course skiers. Didn't take me long to learn the Senate (in the course) for me was like riding a noodle, but free skiing it was awesome. I then did the demo route again and what worked the best for me was a ski multiple short liners told me "do not ski" but once on it, they agreed it was the best for me. |
||
Please support The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
1976 Ski Nautique 351 Escort 1993 Ski Nautique purple and black 351 HO PCM |
||
quinner
Grand Poobah Joined: October-12-2005 Location: Unknown Status: Offline Points: 5828 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you are just learning go with the rear toe plate. I skied many years and ski's with DBL boots and after my second injury from a front foot only release made the change back to a RTP, it did not effect my skiing negatively at all, Andy Mapple skied with a RTP and it sure didn't hold him back, lol. Another advantage of the RTP is you can start with just one foot in which typically creates less drag.
|
||
AAM196
Gold Member Joined: October-23-2012 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I ski double boots... In 24 years I have never had injury with the double but did with an in RTP setup where back foot came out while front stayed in the highwrap many years ago. With my newer Strada boots I have yet to come out of ski. That being said... the RTP is so much easier to deal with on the platform or dock and you can dock start etc. I have heard the theories of one being safer than another but really it comes down to personal preference and in the course, I am much better with the doubles.
So a few years back there were a few "click in" boot designs like the Mapple or the HO? Don't see it as much... anyone know why, use one etc? |
||
Netdewt
Senior Member Joined: February-15-2010 Location: Minneapolis Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I might be all over this. Send pics or something if you have Large double 98s to trade. Biggest thing right now is I want to get on the water. I just spent more on leisure than I ever have in my life (the boat). Gotta keep the ski cheap. MWSA club here recommended the double boots. I'm not new, just new to double boots and have never skied an actual course. I've always been pretty aggressive free skier and I don't have issues getting up out of the water. |
||
1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
||
aupatking
Senior Member Joined: October-03-2013 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Does anyone else have problems posting pictures from an iPhone on here? I've tried several times and can't get it to do anything. I'll sync my phone to my computer and send you pictures. I will say, I took the large boot out of the box I found them in, and it's not in as good condition as the XL was. I just thought they were both in the same condition. The over wraps are showing a bit of dry rot. Not bad at all, but when they start, they don't stop. I'll post the pictures anyway and you can take a look at them.
Again, anyone know any tricks to make the site accept pictures from an iPhone? |
||
02 SN 196 TSC2 ZO
01 SN 196 TSC1 98 SN 196 TSC1 97 SN 196 TSC1 93 SN 196 NWZ |
||
Netdewt
Senior Member Joined: February-15-2010 Location: Minneapolis Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Shoot... these ones look brand new. Maybe if I keep watching CL, I'll find another of these with smaller bindings. I posted pics above, since that usually helps.
A bit of Dawn did the trick getting into them. They are definitely loose. After I got my feet in, I realized I really do ski left foot forward. |
||
1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
||
aupatking
Senior Member Joined: October-03-2013 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
AAM196 the boot system I use is the one Andy Mapple used to sell. I actually bought my setup from him. I will say, you'll have to either have a skier wife, or not tell her how much you spent on the boots. I just was not willing to break my ankle again but wanted a really high performance boot setup. I turned early and caught 4 ball with the front of my ski 3 weeks ago and the whole ski bent backwards on me at 22-off at 34 mph. Had I not been using these boots, I would have broken my leg/ankle or torn my Achilles. These boots saved me, again. I had a minor sprain, but was running the course again this weekend
|
||
02 SN 196 TSC2 ZO
01 SN 196 TSC1 98 SN 196 TSC1 97 SN 196 TSC1 93 SN 196 NWZ |
||
aupatking
Senior Member Joined: October-03-2013 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
02 SN 196 TSC2 ZO
01 SN 196 TSC1 98 SN 196 TSC1 97 SN 196 TSC1 93 SN 196 NWZ |
||
Netdewt
Senior Member Joined: February-15-2010 Location: Minneapolis Status: Offline Points: 222 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
How did you modify them to fit like a Large?
|
||
1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
||
AAM196
Gold Member Joined: October-23-2012 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not sure about an XL being for size 10-12. My old Jobe highwraps were size L and I wear a size 11...
Your only shot at making the XLs work for a size 9 is to tighten the wraps as much as possible. I doubt it would work. |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |