Wiring fuel sending unit |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
Bri892001
Grand Poobah Joined: September-27-2008 Location: Boston MA Status: Offline Points: 4947 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I saw the other post too.
I'm a little less than fully satisfied, since I would think that a float arm that is too long would prevent the gauge from reading all the way empty (since it hits the bottom before it get the full downward swing), and the first post said it pegs to empty. But, I suppose if just jams in there on the install it could happen. |
|
ArtCozier
Platinum Member Joined: April-25-2012 Location: Orlando FL Status: Offline Points: 1023 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I guess that if it was just on the borderline of against the stop and jamming against the bottom and the fuel sloshed into it from the port side, it might get driven harder into the bottom. Or, if he took the tank off its mounts to get it out, installed the unit, then bolted the tank back down, it could have pushed the tank bottom hard against the arm. I preferred the earlier senders that had the oval-shaped float bent at 90 degrees to the arm. They laid flatter against the surface of the fuel, therefore I think yielded better accuracy.
Art |
|
"Art"
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |