Differents between the ski nautique boots

Hello everybody

I'm new in this forum. I'm writhing from THE Netherlands so first i have to say sorry for my english

Offcourse i have a question, I'm searching for a SN but is see there are a few differents between THE boats, there are late 80's and early 90's like the 196, 2001, barefoot ect ect. And there is the Supra TMS6 competion build in 1991, found on THE internet.

Can and will somebody explain me THE differents between those boats?

What is the best one to buy? And were to look at when i'm buying a ski nautique

Thank you for THE fast reply

I'm looking for a boat thats made for wakeboarding and having FUN for THE kids.

I deffently take look at you link thank you

The budget is about 7000 euro about 8000 dollar, still trying to save money hahaha.

What they offer her in europ is nothing like in THE USA but transporting will be cost a lot of money.

Its Nice that in europe more people bying Sn. But THE parts USA have THE most

THE most nautique's i found on THE net is both feul.

THE link above is very good deffently THE bolt story for THE wooden stringers

Is the Supra boat also a ski nautique? Or a other factory

Supra is a different company but during that era they shared some components with CC. The Supras that I am familiar with have the same engine as my CC. Specifically the PCM 351W and transmission. Not sure about the other parts but they are very similar boats. As far as CC's go it sounds like you would be looking at SN2001's or early '90's SN's. As I mentioned the hull changed for 1990. The NWZ is a larger boat with more interior room. The ski wake is smaller on the NWZ than the SN2001. Many prefer the SN2001 for wakeboarding but it is probably less functional for family outings. We have had a '92 NWZ since '93 and it worked for our family. Both my children (now 21 and 23) learned to ski and wakeboard behind it. There are lots of opinions about wake size but I believe children learn faster and become more proficient with a smaller wake. My son can throw flips behind our '92. When he has the opportunity to board behind a wakeboard specific boat he typically out rides everyone in the boat.

Thanks agian for your Nice reply.

My tought will be going to early 90's because THE price is better for me. And i like more space in THE boat.

Joeri wrote: Thanks agian for your Nice reply. My tought will be going to early 90's because THE price is better for me. And i like more space in THE boat.

'92 was the last year for wood stringers. One less thing to worry about if you go '93 or newer.

For wakeboarding the 1982-1989 model (Also known as a "2001") would be boat of choice in lower budget range.
It has a phenomenal wake but the boat is small in comparison to newer models.

You might find in europe some of the correct craft / nautique boats will have a mercruiser engine, rather than the more common PCM engine. From what I have been told the Mercruiser was the conversion of choice for factory specced export boats due to part availability worldwide.

I bought one of these purely because I had heard its a great 'cheap' wakeboarding boat, I was not disappointed when I finally managed to get one.

Good luck on the search,

Here is a link to show you the wake behind a "2001" weighted and unweighted

Wakeboarding behind an SN2001

Thats good there is a lot more knowledge floating around on this site for the PCM engines
at least thats what I have seen.

I have the mercruiser engine, which is built of a chev 350 but no big deal either way.