Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 422 acme
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

422 acme

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
schultz227 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: August-20-2019
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 49
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote schultz227 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 422 acme
    Posted: June-10-2020 at 10:16pm
1992 SNOB 351 1 23 1 tranny, put a 422 on yesterday and my rpms dropped from around 4800 to 4100. Had an acme 1868 on with the higher rpms. Just wondering if the lower rpms is ok on the engine. Boat runs smoother and quieter with the 422. I am happy with it as I don’t care about top end really. just want to know if my rpms being that much lower is correct for that prop.
Back to Top
schultz227 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: August-20-2019
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 49
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote schultz227 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-10-2020 at 10:22pm
NOT High Output 351 , by the way
Back to Top
MrMcD View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-28-2014
Location: Folsom, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3777
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrMcD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-10-2020 at 10:36pm
I have a new 422 Acme on our 95 closed bow Ski Nautique, 310 hp version, spins a touch over 5,000.   Maybe it’s time for a power upgrade!
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21198
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-10-2020 at 11:12pm
If you’re not pulling a 422 4400ish then you’re either at altitude or in a poor state of tune... or your tach is lying. Get some reliable speed numbers to help us pinpoint.
Back to Top
AAM196 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: October-23-2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AAM196 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2020 at 2:37am
agreed... I run my 422 om my 99SN gt40 at 2,465 ft above sea level at 4,860 rpms 46 mph...
Back to Top
stepper459 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June-17-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 349
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stepper459 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2020 at 1:40pm
4,100 does seem a bit low. On my old boat I ran the 1868, 654, and 422 back to back just to see what the numbers would be. I saw a 200 RPM difference each time The boat wasn't a CC but it had a GT-40 and PCM 1.23:1 transmission.

1868 - 4700 RPM
654 - 4500 RPM
422 - 4300 RPM

I'm curious to hear from NON-GT-40 people with a 422, what they're seeing for WOT RPM.
Back to Top
gun-driver View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-18-2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 4127
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gun-driver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2020 at 1:52pm
The OP has a ‘92 so non GT-40 not sure on which version HP motor he has.
Back to Top
Jonny Quest View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: August-20-2013
Location: Utah--via Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 3009
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jonny Quest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2020 at 1:54pm
I'm at 4,400 to 6,000 feet of elevation with a GT-40 and I run the 654. My old boat had the H.O. carb engine and it also ran the 654. When I moved from Texas to Utah, I ran the 1868 at first, but the RPMs were too high at WOT. Great hole-shot, but I went down to the 654. I realize that your engine is NOT the High Output, so I would be leaning toward the 654.

I agree that 4,100 RPMs seems too low. As Tim mentioned, you should verify that RPMs are correct and that engine is properly tuned before making too many decisions.

JQ
Current
2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited

Previous
2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow
1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow

Aqua skiing, ergo sum
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21198
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June-15-2020 at 1:58pm
Originally posted by schultz227 schultz227 wrote:

NOT High Output 351 , by the way
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2025 | Bagley Productions, LLC