New 4 blade prop
Printed From: CorrectCraftFan.com
Category: General Correct Craft Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Discription: Anything Correct Craft
URL: http://www.CorrectCraftFan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12430
Printed Date: April-29-2025 at 5:23am
Topic: New 4 blade prop
Posted By: skicat2001
Subject: New 4 blade prop
Date Posted: November-24-2008 at 11:59pm
I have a 85 Nautique 2001 with a 3 blade prop. I have my boat tuned by a wonderful mechanic in Austin tx. In March I am going to upgrade to a 4 blade prop, and I am very curious what will this 4 blade prop do to my performance on the boat. Speed, hull shot, ride, etc. Will I be very impressed and glad I switched to the 4 blad prop. Please reply any suggestions would be great..  ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Replies:
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-25-2008 at 1:11am
|
We need more info. There are many 3-blades out there and many 4-blades, and not all props are created equal. In general, a 4-blade will have slightly better holeshot and slightly lower top end compared to a similar 3-blade.
That being said, dont buy that 4-blade if you havent yet. The newest generation of CNC machined props (Acme and OJ XMP) have the 3-blades outperforming the 4-blades. If skiing or general performance is what youre looking to improve, then this is the best way to spend your money. ------------- |
Posted By: SkiBum
Date Posted: November-25-2008 at 11:29am
|
This is another one of those topics that can be debated endlessly. In the end, I recommend that you contact the tech at Delta Propeller with the specifics about your boat. He will send a recommendation back to you. They carry a variety of props.
That said, I have two ACME props for my '95 Prostar. One is a 3 blade the other a 4 blade. My boat is used only in the slalom course. I am running the 4 blade. The difference in hole shot is negligible. I run the 4 blade because it flattens and softens the rooster tail on my boat. (22 off on an MC is harsh). The people I ski with could not notice the difference when I changed props. Perfect Pass noticed a difference. I had to drop more than 100 rpm on each of my baseline speeds. I guess that means that compared to the 3 blade, the 4 blade turns fewer times to make the boat go the same speed. (on a very micro scale). For my '87 Ski Nautique I bought a shiny new ACME 541 3 blade. I liked it much better than my OJ 3 blade, but actually preferred the wake table with my OJ 4 blade. Again, I think this could be endlessly debated. I am sure there are a ton of folks who prefer the 3 blade props and can give a laundry list of reasons why. Go to the Delta Props website and submit a request. The guy will email you his response. Then you can address specific concerns about how various props will effect your boat. Sorry for the long post. I talk too much. ------------- Bill http://www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks - http://www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks 1987 SN Rebuild Project |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-25-2008 at 8:06pm
|
Wow guys and did not know that there that many differnces in blade props. So I guess find out the specs on my boat to find out what I really need. My mechanic in Austin told me that leave the three blade prop on, but I would like to give it a try on a 4 blade prop. Thanks, If I find out my specs I will turn them lose so you guys might have another suggestion. Thanks ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: anthonylizardi
Date Posted: November-25-2008 at 9:00pm
| I have an 87 SN 2001 with the Ford 351 and the 1:1 transmission. It should be the same boat except for the split windshield. If you search this forum or the "the2001.com" the consensus has been the same. If you are going to primarly use the boat for wakeboard get an ACME 542. This prop will give you a better low end and I heard better tracking at wakeboard speeds. If you want to do everything get an ACME 540. Both are 3 blade prop. I have the 540 is the best money I ever spent. I am still tunning the boat but my boat does 44 mph very quick. TO be honest I regret somewhat not getting the 542. Keeping 20 mph without perfect pass is busy and from what I heard a 542 will help the hole shot even though you might loose a little bit top end. I am no expert but that's the advise these guys gave me and it has been the best advise I ever got. So evaluate your primary activity and select. I haven't slalom on my boat yet but I bet the 540 will take me up to speed quick. Is like a day and night difference. |
Posted By: SNobsessed
Date Posted: November-25-2008 at 10:05pm
|
Has anyone ever been dissatisfied with an Acme prop? ------------- “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.” Ben Franklin |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-25-2008 at 10:25pm
|
My 85 Nautique 2001 has the 351 ford as well. That three blade prop jumps pretty good, but I notice every once in a while, with 3 guys, equipment, and an ice chest full of cold ones, she can sometimes be a little not as quick out of the whole. My boat will get to 45 in a hurry, but I dont want to give away to much top speed. So you say the ACME 542 is the best. I tuned my boat three years ago, and is due next spring. I cant wait, she runs great but I want a little more quickness out of the hole. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 12:07am
No. You want the 540. ------------- |
skicat2001 wrote:Posted By: Root
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 1:54am
|
Tim is right, go with the 540. ------------- RootRacing |
Posted By: anthonylizardi
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 11:40am
I wish I had a 542 and be able to compare. I know last year Tim recommended the 540 and that's what I bought and is great. Now, I heard great things from wakeboarders on the 542. They seem to be happy specially with the ridiculous amount of ballast they put on their boats. I know my boat with 6 adults has a good hole shot and speed so I am very pleased with the 540. Tim, what is the main reason you advocate for the 540? Skicat, evaluate your choices and keep asking question. Tim is one gurus on this site so his advice should be heavily weighted. Also, ask people at the "the2001.com" about their experience using the 542. Too bad I don't have both. The only thing I know that you can't go wrong with the 540 but I still wonder about the other choice. |
Posted By: Luchog
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 11:42am
|
I always wanteds to see a comparison between the 542 and the 4 blade 208.
Anyway I have the 542 almost ready to test as soon as I finish my exhaust issue. ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2095" rel="nofollow - 1980 Ski Nautique Commander 351W |
Posted By: BuffaloBFN
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 11:51am
Wile E. Coyote!  ------------- http://correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2331&sort=&pagenum=12&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - 1988 BFN-sold "It's a Livin' Thing...What a Terrible Thing to Lose" ELO |
Posted By: Hollywood
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 12:11pm
What other questions? We know the "specs" of the boat already. If he wants a little more holeshot, go with the 540. If he wants A LOT more holeshot go with the 542. It's been layed out as good as it gets by Tim (speed freak, "guru"), skibum (slalom dude who rebuilt his whole boat), and yourself the wakeboarder. We all ^^^ post on the2001 as well so really, he's not going to get much more info on props over there, that is if the site is even back up and running. I also don't think Erik is allowing any new registrations still. With the new CNC props, the "4 blade upgrade" argument is totally false. It all depends on what exactly you want a prop to do for you. ------------- |
Posted By: anthonylizardi
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 12:54pm
| Hollywood, you are right. In a nutshell thats the bottom line. Also, I haven't found no other site with so much knowledge and participation. I went from not having clue of what I was doing to at least I have clue (or at least where to look for one). Like I said, so far I just followed the Tim and others advice and my boat is coming along very good. No doubt the 540 is a sure thing. |
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-26-2008 at 1:16pm
He said he didnt want to lose any top end- which he likely will with the 542. He also didnt state that he runs a lot of ballast, which is really the only reason to get a 542, other than possibly running at altitude, in my opinion. The 540 (13x12) drops some pitch from a stock 13x13, so it will already spin more (100-200) RPM's. The difference in holeshot is pretty dramatic just going to the 540. ------------- |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 7:22pm
|
I think all you guys are right. But some of you are saying the 542 and the 540. So really what is going to not change my boat in anyway such as sound, ride speed.. etc. I am guessing for the best whole shoot, I need the 542 and.. I will ask my mechanic about it and see what he says. I am having this spring, new tune every 3yrs, grease rudder port, 4 blade prop, some new hoses, my carb has not been replaced since I bought the boat, and has not given me any probs, except it has burped at me a couple of times. So new carb, and buff and wax. I am expecting with all this and a new 4 blade prop, boat should be jumping, and riding, and sound like a beast running out of the hole. So 540, or 542, listening to yall either one will do me well. I pretty sure my trany is a 1:1.. Thanks for giving me info.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 7:27pm
|
I dont want to lose top end.. Best prop to get a much signaficant hole shot. Boat will run 45, but I dont want a Nautique 2001 85' running 40.. And whinning when it is.. Because rpms are so high.. What you guys think? ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 7:31pm
What is wrong with your exhaust? They cracked.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 7:54pm
Lee, You haven't mentioned the WOT RPM except for this "whining". What is the engine WOT RPM? You also haven't stated what prop you have now. Just wondering what you consider to be a high RPM. Also, who are you asking about a cracked manifold? ------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow - 54 Atom /diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique 64 X55 Dunphy Keep it original, Pete < |
Posted By: adamt
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 8:01pm
------------- -Adam 1973 Skier |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 8:20pm
I was asking that guy up in arubia, i think.. with the 80 nautique ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 8:23pm
|
8122,
Whinning? No I dont want a 4 blade that is going to make my boat whine at high rpms. I dont know what prop I have, it is a 3 blade, that is all I know. It is tuned very well to the boat, I know motors, but not props.. Would it be in my manuel? ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: Luchog
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 9:11pm
|
I've had an issue with one of my exhaust manifolds leaking into cylinder 4, I found both gaskets were bad (aluminium log style manifold) I had both faces resurfaced but then found a pore in the casting, so it's on the welding shop now. Hopefully will get it back on monday.
If I cant save it, I'll order some PCM style manifolds, but since I just got the new prop, strut bearing and EI kit I didnt want to spend more at the time. ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2095" rel="nofollow - 1980 Ski Nautique Commander 351W |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 9:47pm
|
Luchog,
Do manifolds go out after a period of time? I figure with out that if you winterize your boat correctley, manifolds last a long time. I have the orginal PCM manifolds on mine and they rummble with a wonderful sound. You can hear my boat across the lake. But I always wondered if they get bad or go out. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 10:49pm
|
Adam,
Thanks for filling me in on Lunciano's manifold problem. I sure missed it even after re reading the thread. Lee, Yes, exhaust manifolds do go especially in salt or brackish water. Aluminums like Lunciano's are even worse. Aluminum just isn't as durable as cast iron. In time, the aluminum will burn through from the hot exhaust gases and any loss of cooling water in them and it's quick. The prop size won't be in the manual but it should be stamped in the prop hub. Did someone tell you a 4 blade is going to whine? It shouldn't anymore than a 3 blade but I too would go with the 3 blade 540. Do you know your WOT RPM? ------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow - 54 Atom /diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique 64 X55 Dunphy Keep it original, Pete < |
Posted By: Luchog
Date Posted: November-28-2008 at 11:01pm
|
I think aluminium manifolds usually go out before cast irons, and they are a bit harder to repair also. They are also more sensible to heat so you have yo be careful on them running too hot for long periods (running w/o water)
The gain is they are way too light, my set weights like 50lbs. For what I see, my engine it's on it's second set since my manifolds are replacement ones. Someone mentioned there were recurring issues with the Original Commander aluminium manifolds. It depends on many things but I guess you could get 20-30 good years out of any manifold if properly cared. If you get into freezing temps is a good idea to drain/fog them, there are many people more versed on winterization than I since I dont need to, boat is used all year round,luckily 4-5 times a week! ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2095" rel="nofollow - 1980 Ski Nautique Commander 351W |
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 1:13am
You need to re-read the posts above. To pick up holeshot while keeping the top end as high as possible, you want the 540. The 542 will hurt your top end. I would not put much faith in the opinion of your mechanic is he is the one who suggested a 4-blade in the first place, as that is old (outdated) technology. ------------- |
Posted By: JoeinNY
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 1:23am
|
Outdated might be a bit strong, they are still going on new boats and releasing new 4 blades. ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1477 - 1983 Ski Nautique 2001 1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO5MkcBXBBs - Holeshot Video |
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 1:48am
Maybe, maybe not. 10 years ago, 4-blades were all the rage and were considered a nice upgrade over a stock 3-blade. Sometimes you still see this mentality reflected by sellers ("boat features upgraded 4-blade prop!") and misinformed enthusiasts alike ("put a 4-blade on it!"). The fact of the matter is that the new CNC 3-blades outperform their 4-blade counterparts when it comes to all out performance: acceleration and top end. They also handily outperform any non-CNC 4-blade that was considered an "upgrade" just 10 years ago. Youre right that 4-blades have their place, and they do offer certain advantages. They tend to run a *little* smoother/quieter than the 3-blades. Its also argued that they smooth the slalom wake a touch, though I personally think thats more related to the lower revs that the 4-blades tend to turn. I should also mention that my comments were in regards to direct drives only- for whatever reason, the heavier V-drives tend to respond better to the 4-blades. As to why CC continues to offer 4-blades as original equipment on the DD's is anyones guess. Even Acme admits that the 3-blades offer better performance. ------------- |
Posted By: JoeinNY
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 2:53am
|
All I know is I got whooped by two different 4 blade wearing boats up at Lake George... ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1477 - 1983 Ski Nautique 2001 1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO5MkcBXBBs - Holeshot Video |
Posted By: adamt
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 3:02am
What does "DD" mean, I'm a big fan of double D's, but I'm assuming it means something else in this context?!?!? ------------- -Adam 1973 Skier |
Posted By: JoeinNY
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 3:09am
|
Direct Drive ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1477 - 1983 Ski Nautique 2001 1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO5MkcBXBBs - Holeshot Video |
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 1:16pm
I think if you were to have lined up with the 409 out of the hole, you wouldnt have considered it such a whooping... guarantee you would have put 1-2 boatlengths on it. What was the other boat? You and I both know that matching the size of the prop (mainly pitch) to the power curve of the motor is critical. It just so happens that the 4-blades available for the 1.23 are a bit steeper, which lend themselves well to high-hp combos. So tell me Joe- if there was a suitable 3-blade for your boat (~13x16.25 Acme), dont you think that would be the hot ticket?  ------------- |
Posted By: JoeinNY
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 1:27pm
|
I am pretty sure eddie told me he was running a four blade as well but that converstation was after a lot of drinking so I wouldnt be shocked to hear it wasnt the case. I think on the bigger boats with enough torque that there is probably a point where putting more blade area on the three blades to give you a better holeshot (and better pulling boat) will cause the blades to flex at max thrust conditions and hurt your top end. You could get around this with better material or thicker blades but everyone is using nibral and thicker blades have performance issues as well. A lot of this has to do with the rpm your making speed with as well, if I set up for a 5800 rpm horsepower peak instead of a 4800 hp peak the prop would see less stress at the same horsepower level. I do know that with my old setup and a three blade the last 600 rpm of throttle would get me about 1 mph increase and somethin was going on with that 3 blade. ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1477 - 1983 Ski Nautique 2001 1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO5MkcBXBBs - Holeshot Video |
Posted By: SNobsessed
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 1:32pm
|
Joe - Is there a point (in RPM) where a prop starts to cavitate? ------------- “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.” Ben Franklin |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 3:25pm
|
8122,
I came up with wanting to add more whole shot not my mechanic. I asked him briefly about a 4 blade and he really told me that stick with the three blade, it is alot better. He also said, yea a 4 blade will be a huge differnence in hole shot, but you will lose top end speed. Tr, I will look next weekend at my boat, on the prop to see what it is. I keep my boat 50 miles from me, close to the lake.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 3:29pm
|
No, I sure dont know my WOT RPM. Please explain.. Like I said, I am glad to talk to some guys that are very helpful on props,rpms and etc. Know I can learn more and really get my boat hummming.. So what is a 3 blade 542? ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 3:32pm
|
Hey Joein,
I learned alot. I am ptetty sure my boat is set a certain way and but do not know. So you can set your rpms to your props and then it could change your horsepower if not set correctly.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: JoeinNY
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 3:50pm
|
For clarification, I do recommend the three blade cnc props for almost all DD boats and almost all uses they are the best all around performer, just not sure we can throw away all the four blades just yet.
Cavitation is a pretty specific and often violent event that usually leaves behind some evidence, more common to simply increase slippage. Now whether the slippage increases simply because it now takes an exponentially increasing amount of power to get moving faster or because the blades are flexing and becoming less efficient, or a combination of both I dont know. Skicat, Sorry to include all this confusion on your post, its all way past what you need for your boat. The following applies to you, The prop determines how many rpm your engine can achieve. A larger pitch prop, or sometimes the same pitch prop with additional blades is harder to turn and will keep your engine to a lower RPM (rotations per minute) at WOT (wide open throttle or full speed). A smaller pitch prop is easier to turn will let your engine turn more RPM and typically has a better whole shot. Your boat if stock should run between 4400 and 4600 rpm at WOT with minimal load. If it runs significantly lower than that you need less pitch, if it runs significantly higher you need more pitch. In general the 542 will run more rpm and give you better holeshot (good for heavily loaded boats used mostly for boarding, or boats where the engine is getting a little tired), and the 540 will run lower rpm and give you better top speed. For your boat most (but not all) have found that both are better in every way than the stock 13 x 13 three blade props that were standard on this boat, and both are better in every way than any of the four blades available. ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1477 - 1983 Ski Nautique 2001 1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO5MkcBXBBs - Holeshot Video |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 4:23pm
|
That makes since Joein.. My RPM's at wide open throttle are at 46, or 45.. ok, now then what is next is that good or bad. My boat is the same as yours only two years newer, but you put a large motor in yours. So i guess are boats are different. I have the 85 nautique 2001, and my will whine at a high pitch rpm, say around about 38,39 on the rpms, then she will hit 46 on rpms. My speed is also the same as rpms or 2 away of what I am told. So my boat runs 46 rpms, I am running 44mph. So do I need a different sound prop, or check this one out first. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 4:42pm
|
Lee,
Confirm what prop you have on the boat now. Take a look and see if it is the 13x13. ------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow - 54 Atom /diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique 64 X55 Dunphy Keep it original, Pete < |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: November-29-2008 at 5:56pm
|
8122,
I sure will.. I am going up there this next weekend to check. Please look for my reply, I would really like some more advice after I get the specs. You guys know your props.. Thanks ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: Hollywood
Date Posted: December-02-2008 at 8:53pm
you got all the advice you are looking for 10 ***************ing times over already ------------- |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-02-2008 at 9:55pm
|
Hollywood,
Sure. thanks.. I did get all the advice I need, a second opion does not hurt..  ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-21-2008 at 11:22pm
|
Ok guys, I got a 3 blade 13 x 13 prop. So what should I get. 540 or 542? Or should I stay with the three blade maybe a differnt one. What you think? ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: Luchog
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 3:23am
|
Just got the 542 a few weeks ago, I had a 13x12 installed before.
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12473&PN=1 I think it mainly reduces to how and what you use your boat for, I want good power out of the hole for wakeboarding or cruising with many friends onboard. I dont mind for speed at all even though I think I have plenty with the 542. ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2095" rel="nofollow - 1980 Ski Nautique Commander 351W |
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 7:33am
|
Lee,
Considering what you want to use the boat for and the WOT, my vote is the 540. Other opinions? ------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow - 54 Atom /diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique 64 X55 Dunphy Keep it original, Pete < |
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 2:21pm
------------- |
Posted By: Hollywood
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 2:29pm
|
Try a Federal or Michigan Wheel, they do make a 13x13 and a 13x12 to fit your boat. It would be an awesome upgrade! ------------- |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 7:35pm
|
Ok sounds good.. One ? guys.. Do they make a another 3 blade prop with different specs say a 540 in a 3 blade or 542 3 blade that will make a difference. Or those just in a 4 blade props.. I think that after listening to yall talk... Think the 540 is best bet. The 542 is more hull shot though, right. I use my boat for skiing, crusing, tubing every once in a while. Mostly me and friend go to the lake and ski each other.. I thought it would be nice to get a harder hole shot, and maybe just loose a 1-2 mph on top end.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 7:44pm
Maybe you should go with Hollywood's prop suggestion. ------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow - 54 Atom /diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique 64 X55 Dunphy Keep it original, Pete < |
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 8:36pm
Lee, Don't go looking for Hollywood's props. My statement is facetious!! His was too!! You asking about the 540 and 542 being made in other configurations than 3 blades tells me you're not reading and doing your research! Read the thread again. Go to Delta prop (banner or link on site). Do a forum search and read up on all the reports. ------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow - 54 Atom /diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique 64 X55 Dunphy Keep it original, Pete < |
Posted By: Mojo
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 8:43pm
|
I've got this really cool 2 blade red composite prop, just put out by the Acmme company. It's 12x12 and a brass hook for attaching the rubber propulsion extension bands... I was quoted top speed of 49mph for the first 40 yards when wound correctly.. Any advise on going with this style prop/system Hollywood???
Moj'  ------------- 05' SV211 TE 73' Martinique had:96' SNOB had:76' Nautique had 77 Tique |
Posted By: Hollywood
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 9:16pm
|
Moj', I think you're getting a little too deep for this blog. 2 blade 12x12 propulsion extension props deserve their own blog.
Anyone know anything about those "high 5" props? They sound popular and fast on those outboards. 70 mph??? Yeah baby...  ------------- |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 11:08pm
|
ok sounds good.. I will do a little more research on some props. I just want to make sure I put the right one on, and nothing changes except hole shot. Yall have talked alot about different props but if there is a another 3 blade prop out there that performs better than what I got then I will stay with the 3 blade. If not I most likley will go with the 540. I will goggle props and see whats going on.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: SNobsessed
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 11:09pm
|
Skicat - Call Delta & tell them what you want to do with your boat (even if it tubing). They know their stuff & won't steer you wrong.
Might give you a hard time about tubing, though. Merry Christmas! ------------- “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.” Ben Franklin |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 11:13pm
|
Ok SNobessed,
I will call Delta props, but I dont use my boat for tubing, only a little.. Maybe twice.. Mostly skiing and when my friends cant go to the lake I go by myself.. Merry Christmas to you as well.. Thanks.. ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |
Posted By: Luchog
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 11:31pm
|
ACME 540 ------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2095" rel="nofollow - 1980 Ski Nautique Commander 351W |
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-22-2008 at 11:41pm
|
ACME 540Luchog
Ok, I am thinking that is the best prop too.. I have listend to alot of yalls opions and think its the best prop for my boat.. Only three more months and I am getting my boat ready for spring..lol to sad for you guys up north..  ------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson |