Print Page | Close Window

289 Interceptor/ 302 ford wanted

Printed From: CorrectCraftFan.com
Category: Buy and Sell
Forum Name: Boat Parts Wanted
Forum Discription: Parts wanted only
URL: http://www.CorrectCraftFan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=15857
Printed Date: November-18-2024 at 9:27am


Topic: 289 Interceptor/ 302 ford wanted
Posted By: ThefishingMechine2
Subject: 289 Interceptor/ 302 ford wanted
Date Posted: November-20-2009 at 4:16pm
Well we would like a 289 interceptor for our 68 freeport, like it came stock. But, we would also go for the 302 ford because we beleive that will bolt right up.

We would prefer that it was in good condition. Running doesn't matter cause we can rebuild the motor as long as we do not have to machine it.



Replies:
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: November-21-2009 at 8:14pm
Originally posted by ThefishingMechine2 ThefishingMechine2 wrote:

Well we would like a 289 interceptor for our 68 freeport, like it came stock. But, we would also go for the 302 ford because we beleive that will bolt right up.

We would prefer that it was in good condition. Running doesn't matter cause we can rebuild the motor as long as we do not have to machine it.


Careful with the bell housing bolt pattern. The new blocks don't necessarily bolt up to the old bell housings. I'm sure one of the guys can fill in the blanks regarding the details but it has something to do with the quantity and location of the bolts. There's a thread on it someplace too.

I'm confused with you not needing a running engine, can rebuild it, but have a problem with machine work. There must be someone in your area that will bore/grind??? South Bend isn't that remote!!!!

BTW, most people who do their own rebuilds will job out the machine work.

-------------
/diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow -

54 Atom

/diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<


Posted By: Fl Inboards
Date Posted: November-21-2009 at 9:37pm
Contact Art Cozier at Correct Craft he has leads on a number of those motors, acozier at correctcraft dot com
Tell him Jody sent ya!

-------------
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.




1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0


Posted By: ThefishingMechine2
Date Posted: November-22-2009 at 12:24am
Originally posted by 8122pbrainard 8122pbrainard wrote:


Careful with the bell housing bolt pattern. The new blocks don't necessarily bolt up to the old bell housings. I'm sure one of the guys can fill in the blanks regarding the details but it has something to do with the quantity and location of the bolts. There's a thread on it someplace too.

I'm confused with you not needing a running engine, can rebuild it, but have a problem with machine work. There must be someone in your area that will bore/grind??? South Bend isn't that remote!!!!

BTW, most people who do their own rebuilds will job out the machine work.


Well the main reason we dont have to do machine work is because of how expensive it can get. Plus it is a hassle, we could probably find someone to machine the block and heads on the motor we have. But then we will have to get tons of parts with it most likely.

-------------


Posted By: lhalliii
Date Posted: November-25-2009 at 10:15pm
I have a 74 302 out of Mustang 17 w/ drive & shaft. It is a running motor.
my contacts are.

9194278664
or
lhalliii@nc.rr.com


Posted By: WaterFamily
Date Posted: July-10-2011 at 5:19pm
Do you still need the motor? I have one I am willing to part with for a decent price. email me at ctull8@yahoo.com if your interested!


Posted By: sam57
Date Posted: July-12-2011 at 1:25pm
I have a complete Commander marine conversion and transmission out of a 79 SkiTique that had a cracked block. You supply a 289 302 or 351 long block and bolt the parts on.

Sam


Posted By: connorssons
Date Posted: July-15-2011 at 11:27am
Call c p machine in ft wayne very good and priced right


Posted By: ny_nautique
Date Posted: July-15-2011 at 11:40am
Guys - the original post is from November 2009.



Print Page | Close Window