Print Page | Close Window

Average Hours for 1993 Ski Nautique

Printed From: CorrectCraftFan.com
Category: General Correct Craft Discussion
Forum Name: Common Questions
Forum Discription: Visit here first for common questions regarding your Correct Craft
URL: http://www.CorrectCraftFan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=20120
Printed Date: November-23-2024 at 2:12am


Topic: Average Hours for 1993 Ski Nautique
Posted By: pmccook1
Subject: Average Hours for 1993 Ski Nautique
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 2:39pm
What should the average hours be for a 1993 Ski Nautique ?



-------------
pmccook1

Current boat:1993 Ski Nautique " Purple "
Have owned : 76' ski nautique, 93' Sport Nautique, 83 Stars and stripes, 47' Chris Craft Continental



Replies:
Posted By: quinner
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 3:00pm
50hrs per season is considered "average", 17x50=850hrs


-------------
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1143" rel="nofollow - Mi Bowt


Posted By: Fl Inboards
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 3:04pm

I had a 2009 SN with 400 hours. Currently have a 2010 with 175 hours and a 2011 with 75 hours. I know of a 2008 with 2600 hours and a 2009 with 1600 hours. And a 2007 with 40 hours.
My 92 had 1500 hours. My sons 82 had 900 hours. Their is a 95 sport here with 465 hours.
Is their and average??

-------------
Hobby Boats can be expensive when the hobbyist is limited on their own skill and expertise.




1993 Shamrock "fat" 20. 2008 Nautique 196 5.0


Posted By: kapla
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 4:29pm
my 1992 has 2030 hours!! thats 110 hours a year. I guess it depends of the location of the boat..a FL boat will likely have more hours than a north boat due to the fact it can be used year round...



-------------
<a href="">1992 ski nautique


Posted By: thatdude596
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 5:06pm
i dont think there is an average. id rather see a boat thats been used and well taken care of, over a real low hour boat that sat much of its time. i have a 94 w 1700 hours. i dont read into the hours much, due to fact how easy it is to disconnect the meter. a boats overall condition tells much more imho.


Posted By: pmccook1
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 6:57pm
Thanks for the answers. Thats exactly the way I was thinking. I've never given much thought to the hour meter myself.   And I'll agree I'd rather have a boat thats been running instead of sitting in a garage or worse out in the weather. I've bought boats with low hours before and they usually turned out to have the most gremlins pop up when you least expected it.

I was selling my 93 purple with 1300 hours. And someone commented it was a lot of hours for the money which lead me to finally ask the
" Average " question.   



-------------
pmccook1

Current boat:1993 Ski Nautique " Purple "
Have owned : 76' ski nautique, 93' Sport Nautique, 83 Stars and stripes, 47' Chris Craft Continental


Posted By: Bri892001
Date Posted: December-06-2010 at 7:33pm
Definitely point to maintenance you've done etc. to help your case.

I agree that used, but not abused, and well maintained beats neglected.


Posted By: wakeboardin2k4
Date Posted: December-07-2010 at 12:07am
I swear that people see the 1000 hour mark and poop their pants and run from the boat.

Like it was said before, I would much rather have a boat with a reasonable amount of hours on it. Most people put 1000 hours on their cars in the first 3 years of owning it....yes i know its a different story but you guys know what I mean. For a buyer to be nervous about 1000 hours is silly.

As Brian said. Point out your maintenance and offer to do a compression test in front of them if they are a serious buyer.

-------------
"I'm planning to bring my girl that rides on a trailer with me and leave my girl that complains about camping at home"


Posted By: OverMyHead
Date Posted: December-07-2010 at 2:39am
By my rough math figuring a car with mostly highway use, averages 50 mph overall (probably high). 1000 hrs would be 50,000 miles, It seems most cars die of rust (in minnesota anyway) but the engines can go 200,000 miles if maintained. So 1000 hours is not a big deal.

-------------
For thousands of years men have felt the irresistible urge to go to sea, and many of them died. Things got better after they invented boats.
1987 Ski Nautique



Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: December-08-2010 at 10:35pm
My 85 I have 816 hrs on it. Which is equivalant to 81,000 thousand miles on a car. But as it truley depends on the owner and how it was maintained. If I saw a boat with 1500 hrs and was cared for and maintance records are there, hrs on a boat makes no difference.

-------------
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson




Posted By: MartyMabe
Date Posted: December-09-2010 at 11:21am
-- x 50 = avg

So that means the 66 Skylark has 2200 hrs?

-------------
66 Skylark
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5041" rel="nofollow - 93 SN
If you're not living in NC, you're just camping out!


Posted By: The Godfather
Date Posted: December-10-2010 at 1:23am


72 Mustang, 498 hrs. do the math....

Not counting flying hours...



-------------
Jbear, said to me wow if it was'nt for this site we would never had met for this to happen....


Posted By: MartyMabe
Date Posted: December-10-2010 at 1:46am
That's a little less than 18
hours per year, Godfather.

So it must be used for only 'Feedin the fishes'

-------------
66 Skylark
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5041" rel="nofollow - 93 SN
If you're not living in NC, you're just camping out!


Posted By: Greasy Lake
Date Posted: January-12-2011 at 6:31pm
94 with 525 hours.


Posted By: storm34
Date Posted: January-12-2011 at 7:48pm
78-412 hrs
88-1,900 hrs (when sold)
90-650 hrs (friends boat)
96-520 hrs

I've always heard what Quinner said, 50 hrs/yr.

Not sure that I can attest to that because we put a lot of hours on our boats. For example: One cruise around the lake at night = 1 hour. Do that 3 nights a week and you have 50 hours in a summer right there without any ski time.

Our 88 had 1,900 hours (400 when we bought it) and never a serious issue other than an oil pump going out one spring. My 78 has 412 and the motor is out as we speak......hours aren't necessarily bad.

-------------


Posted By: Luchog
Date Posted: January-12-2011 at 9:34pm
I'd worry hours on a GM engine, but not on a ford.

Have 2 1995+ GM 350 blocks cracked on the lifter valley to trash in the last 6 months.

-------------
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=2095" rel="nofollow - 1980 Ski Nautique

Commander 351W


Posted By: mdvalant
Date Posted: January-13-2011 at 1:01am
One argument I haven't seen included is when you guys compare the car motors to boat motors. I understand a little rounding up with average MPH and what now but what about the fact that a boat is underpower virtually every HR it is running where as a car can coast and let the motored rest. Maybe I jut missed it but it could be something to think about.

This being said, I'm a believer that hrs don't matter...buddies 88 has 1900 running strong, dads 90 has 1350....running pretty good yet too. Minor things here and there but if the price is right.

-------------
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5009 - '90 Ski (sold)
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5479 - '00 Sport
Mississippi River - Bellevue, IA


Posted By: storm34
Date Posted: January-13-2011 at 1:45pm
Originally posted by mdvalant mdvalant wrote:

buddies 88 has 1900 running strong


And it still looks good if thats the one I saw when we were in Coralville.

As to comparing boats to cars, what I've heard is along the lines of what Mike is getting at.....boats run up hill every second they are moving forward. Makes complete sense.

-------------


Posted By: mdvalant
Date Posted: January-13-2011 at 1:46pm
haha yup that's the one Chris. There's an 88 on ebay right now...it's reallly nice. Best colors too IMO ;)

-------------
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5009 - '90 Ski (sold)
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5479 - '00 Sport
Mississippi River - Bellevue, IA


Posted By: river ratt
Date Posted: July-25-2011 at 2:37am
1987 sn 2001 640 hrs performance engineered for a Eric Selkirk.was he a pro skiier or something?

-------------
dont slip on the glass


Posted By: GlassSeeker
Date Posted: July-25-2011 at 3:08am
left my key on and drained the battery and added 160 hours to the clock

-------------
This is the life


Posted By: Morfoot
Date Posted: July-25-2011 at 11:46am
Originally posted by river ratt river ratt wrote:

1987 sn 2001 640 hrs performance engineered for a Eric Selkirk.was he a pro skiier or something?


The plaque was just a "extra" added by CC to personalize YOUR boat. If the boat changed owners you could get them straight from CC but they do not do that anymore.


HOWEVER....MartyMabe is the man you need to talk to as he is getting them reproduced and has had many performanced engineered plaques made for the members here.

-------------
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"


Posted By: MartyMabe
Date Posted: July-27-2011 at 1:40am
river ratt

Shoot me an E-Mail

mtmabe@northstate.net

-------------
66 Skylark
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=5041" rel="nofollow - 93 SN
If you're not living in NC, you're just camping out!


Posted By: KRoundy
Date Posted: July-27-2011 at 3:08am
My 1993 hull has 2853.7 hours. :)

-------------
Previous: 1993 Electric Blue/Charcoal Ski Nautique
Current: 2016 Ski Nautique 200 Open Bow


Posted By: emccallum
Date Posted: July-27-2011 at 12:01pm
There isnt near as much to wear out in a boat as a car. Engine,tranny, shaft, and a couple of bushings. No suspension, brakes, A/c, doors, etc. Our hulls (especially 93+) will outlast us! As a buyer, I would use hours as a bargaining chip, but a well maintained boat is more important.



Print Page | Close Window