Rpm 87sn 2001
Printed From: CorrectCraftFan.com
Category: General Correct Craft Discussion
Forum Name: Common Questions
Forum Discription: Visit here first for common questions regarding your Correct Craft
URL: http://www.CorrectCraftFan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=22960
Printed Date: November-23-2024 at 12:37am
Topic: Rpm 87sn 2001
Posted By: river ratt
Subject: Rpm 87sn 2001
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 6:30pm
my friend and had a little race on the river.He has a 79 sn mine is a 87 sn 2001. his boat was clearly faster,and pulled away from me steady. He said his rpms were 5400. I could barley get my boat to4000. we looked at our props,and both were 13×13rh mine was a bridle cup his a super cup.Could that alone be the difference in my low rpm? Granted my boats slightly bigger.would i get more top end switching props or is that the recommend one? thx in advance for input and opinions
------------- dont slip on the glass
|
Replies:
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 7:18pm
Not given,
You should be cranking more than 4K. Somethings not correct and I doubt it's the prop however, wait for some of the prop guys to chime in.
There's a big difference between the 2 hulls. Even if you find a problem and get the revs up, you will not outrun him. It's a fact that the 2001 hulls are not fast!!!
5400 to me is getting up there for a stock engine which normally red lines around 4500. Has he been doing some engine mods and not telling you??
How much wet foam are you carrying around in the hull? Have you ever pulled it across a scale to check it? Or, has the hull been re stringered?
BTW, if you care to, add your first name to your profile. You mave not noticed but unlike other sites, CCfan members have a tendency to use first names rather than screen names. Maybe it's the "old guy" in me but I feel it's more personal. Many have done it!!! I really do not want to keep calling you "not given"!!!
------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow -
54 Atom
/diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique
64 X55 Dunphy
Keep it original, Pete <
|
Posted By: OverMyHead
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 9:18pm
River ratt, My stock 87 with an acme 540 runs about 4200 RPM and hits 43-44 mph on gps, I dont like to run WOT for more than a minute or 2 at a time, 5400 would scare me.
------------- For thousands of years men have felt the irresistible urge to go to sea, and many of them died. Things got better after they invented boats. 1987 Ski Nautique
|
Posted By: P71_CrownVic
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 9:43pm
8122pbrainard wrote:
How much wet foam are you carrying around in the hull? Have you ever pulled it across a scale to check it? Or, has the hull been re stringered?
|
Rather than start a new thread, I'll ask this here...
What is the weight a person should see if they were to weigh their boat and trailer with full fluids and 1/2 a tank of gas?
-------------
|
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 10:01pm
P71_CrownVic wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
How much wet foam are you carrying around in the hull? Have you ever pulled it across a scale to check it? Or, has the hull been re stringered?
|
Rather than start a new thread, I'll ask this here...
What is the weight a person should see if they were to weigh their boat and trailer with full fluids and 1/2 a tank of gas? |
Matt,
All you need to do is to go into the reference section and find the dry weight of the hull as it was shipped from the factory. Add a few pounds for fuel and the battery and estimate trailer weight and your done. What is your problem?? Weight of a battery is a given as well as the weight of a gallon of gas!! I'm still struggling with your question???? Do you have a calculator? Sorry!!!
------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow -
54 Atom
/diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique
64 X55 Dunphy
Keep it original, Pete <
|
Posted By: P71_CrownVic
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 10:20pm
8122pbrainard wrote:
P71_CrownVic wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
How much wet foam are you carrying around in the hull? Have you ever pulled it across a scale to check it? Or, has the hull been re stringered?
|
Rather than start a new thread, I'll ask this here...
What is the weight a person should see if they were to weigh their boat and trailer with full fluids and 1/2 a tank of gas? |
Matt,
All you need to do is to go into the reference section and find the dry weight of the hull as it was shipped from the factory. Add a few pounds for fuel and the battery and estimate trailer weight and your done. What is your problem?? Weight of a battery is a given as well as the weight of a gallon of gas!! I'm still struggling with your question???? Do you have a calculator? Sorry!!! |
I went to public school. All I know is, I like books with pictures and math is not my forte.
I was just looking for a number off the top of someones head. My hope was that someone would reply with "around 3500 pounds".
I'm lazy....what can I say...
-------------
|
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: August-04-2011 at 10:59pm
P71_CrownVic wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
[QUOTE=P71_CrownVic] [QUOTE=8122pbrainard]
How much wet foam are you carrying around in the hull? Have you ever pulled it across a scale to check it? Or, has the hull been re stringered?
|
I went to public school. All I know is, I like books with pictures and math is not my forte.
I was just looking for a number off the top of someones head. My hope was that someone would reply with "around 3500 pounds".
I'm lazy....what can I say... |
Matt,
Next time your're over at the hardware store, look for a little black book titled "pocket ref" It has all the data in it needed!! SG's of anything you need!!
We can't help out with everything!! BTW, does your wife help you out every time you need to go relieve yourself !!!!
------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow -
54 Atom
/diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique
64 X55 Dunphy
Keep it original, Pete <
|
Posted By: JoeinNY
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 4:41pm
8122pbrainard wrote:
It's a fact that the 2001 hulls are not fast!!!
|
Now he tells me!
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1477 - 1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO5MkcBXBBs - Holeshot Video
|
Posted By: OverMyHead
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 4:53pm
JoeinNY wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
It's a fact that the 2001 hulls are not fast!!!
|
Now he tells me! |
Nothing that 500 well tuned hp cannot overcome!
------------- For thousands of years men have felt the irresistible urge to go to sea, and many of them died. Things got better after they invented boats. 1987 Ski Nautique
|
Posted By: river ratt
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 5:37pm
thax guys what could not be correct? the motor runs strong and fast enough for my 220 lbs friend to barefoot and slolam behind at 35+mph. what should the whole rig weigh on a trailer?
------------- dont slip on the glass
|
Posted By: 8122pbrainard
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 5:38pm
OverMyHead wrote:
JoeinNY wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
It's a fact that the 2001 hulls are not fast!!!
|
Now he tells me! |
Nothing that 500 well tuned hp cannot overcome! |
Yeh Joe, you need to tell him what's needed to get some speed out of that hull!!
------------- /diaries/details.asp?ID=1622" rel="nofollow -
54 Atom
/diaries/details.asp?ID=2179" rel="nofollow - 77 Tique
64 X55 Dunphy
Keep it original, Pete <
|
Posted By: skicat2001
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 9:50pm
JoeinNY wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
It's a fact that the 2001 hulls are not fast!!!
|
Now he tells me! |
Dont worry about it Joe. I think you got the fastest 2001 hull around and will smoke most others.
------------- 1985 CC 2001-SOLD Lee Michael Johnson
|
Posted By: P71_CrownVic
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 10:44pm
JoeinNY wrote:
8122pbrainard wrote:
It's a fact that the 2001 hulls are not fast!!!
|
Now he tells me! |
Realistically....45MPH isn't that slow...
-------------
|
Posted By: P71_CrownVic
Date Posted: August-05-2011 at 10:45pm
8122pbrainard wrote:
BTW, does your wife help you out every time you need to go relieve yourself !!!! |
Yes...and she always shakes more than twice!
-------------
|
Posted By: 63 Skier
Date Posted: August-08-2011 at 12:45pm
P71_CrownVic wrote:
Rather than start a new thread, I'll ask this here...
What is the weight a person should see if they were to weigh their boat and trailer with full fluids and 1/2 a tank of gas? |
'86 2001 dry weight 2,400 lbs. - add 100 lbs. for fluids and battery, 100 lbs. for 1/2 tank gas, 1,000 lbs. for trailer. Total is 3,600 lbs. The number I'm really not sure of is the trailer.
------------- '63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
|
Posted By: P71_CrownVic
Date Posted: August-09-2011 at 12:22am
Thanks man!!!!
-------------
|
|