Need new Acme prop, recommendation?
Printed From: CorrectCraftFan.com
Category: Repairs and Maintenance
Forum Name: Boat Maintenance
Forum Discription: Discuss maintenance of your Correct Craft
URL: http://www.CorrectCraftFan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=49195
Printed Date: January-16-2025 at 8:44am
Topic: Need new Acme prop, recommendation?
Posted By: Netdewt
Subject: Need new Acme prop, recommendation?
Date Posted: September-06-2020 at 7:39pm
I have a 1989 Ski Nautique 351W. I currently have (had, we found some rocks) an Acme 2068 that was installed by the previous owner for max speed (I could almost get it to 50mph).
Can you recommend a prop for best performance at 15-25mph? We trick ski and wakeboard, not much slalom speed needed.
I’ve seen 422 and 1868 recommended. There are so many variables I don’t know how to choose. My understanding is this boat is the first year with the 1:1.23 trans, and so uses different props than other 2001s.
Anyone have a favorite?
------------- 1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
Replies:
Posted By: MrMcD
Date Posted: September-06-2020 at 8:29pm
I have the 422, it is a nice prop, tops out around 46 with the 310 HP Pro Boss. Very strong out of the hole and quiet always.
-------------
|
Posted By: Jonny Quest
Date Posted: September-07-2020 at 12:36am
654 is a good choice as it’s a “tweeter” in between the 422 and 1868.
JQ
------------- Current 2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited
Previous 2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow 1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow
Aqua skiing, ergo sum
|
Posted By: Netdewt
Date Posted: September-08-2020 at 12:29pm
Jonny Quest wrote:
654 is a good choice as it’s a “tweeter” in between the 422 and 1868.
JQ |
Good call. I think Acme is recommending this also.
Is 4 blade going to benefit me? I don’t do ballasts. I’m hoping for better speed control in the 17-22mph range, but maybe that’s always an issue without Perfect Pass.
------------- 1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
Posted By: Jonny Quest
Date Posted: September-08-2020 at 4:41pm
4 vs 3 blade is always a fun discussion. That being said...how many LARGE wake boats are sold with a 3-blade prop as stock configuration? Go with the 4-blade. If you really want low-end grunt and slower speed performance, consider the 1868. Just watch the tach as you can over-rev by several hundred RPMs with a good engine and the 1868 (voice of experience). Hole shot will be very strong...
JQ
------------- Current 2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited
Previous 2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow 1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow
Aqua skiing, ergo sum
|
Posted By: Netdewt
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 1:17pm
I went for the 654. The 2068 is not repairable (not surprised).
So my spare is an old non-Acme that was lightly repaired by my uncle. It works but it’s rough.
Do you all keep nice spares?
What is your max RPM for a 351W? I stay under 4500, and that’s just short bursts for fun. Daily usual RPM is under 3000.
------------- 1989 Ski Nautique 2001, 940 hours
|
Posted By: halfnelly
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 2:12pm
Netdewt wrote:
I went for the 654. The 2068 is not repairable (not surprised).
So my spare is an old non-Acme that was lightly repaired by my uncle. It works but it’s rough.
Do you all keep nice spares?
What is your max RPM for a 351W? I stay under 4500, and that’s just short bursts for fun. Daily usual RPM is under 3000. |
You'll get better performance if you let it spin a little, 5000 is safe. My 1600 hour 351 will turn my Acme 422 to 5400 and my 1868 to almost 5600. The 1868 is a bit too short, I try not to run WOT on the top end. It's a great low speed and holeshot prop, though. You can also see in the photos how off the stock tach is compared to the PerfectPass. 422:
1868:
|
Posted By: SNobsessed
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 4:18pm
I had ACME 1442 on my 1989 2001 & it was just right for us (wakeboarding with moderate ballast).
The 422 was just too much prop.
------------- “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”
Ben Franklin
|
Posted By: desertskier
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 5:09pm
My '89 had the 240hp 351w. I tried the 422 and as mentioned it was too much prop. I went back to the OJ that came with it. Don't remember exactly what it was but it worked better.
------------- 92 SN - Owned since 93 99 Pro Air 89 SN - Went to live on a lake in Texas 75 Donzi 16 - Sold in 93
|
Posted By: MrMcD
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 7:01pm
Nelly, what HP engine sins a 422 to 5,600 rpm? In what hull? My 310HP in the 95 196 only turns around 5,000, maybe a touch more on a good day. I used to spin 5,300 rpm when I ran the acme 224. I liked that prop but had it repaired again and it is not the same.
-------------
|
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 7:35pm
Posted By: Faceplant
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 7:56pm
Curious. What do you mean when you say - too much prop ?
------------- Feels like I am hanging 10 but in reality - probably hanging 6.
|
Posted By: SNobsessed
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 9:17pm
Faceplant wrote:
Curious. What do you mean when you say - too much prop ? |
The engine did not have good throttle response at wakeboard speeds 18-20 mph.
------------- “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”
Ben Franklin
|
Posted By: halfnelly
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 10:55pm
MrMcD wrote:
Nelly, what HP engine sins a 422 to 5,600 rpm? In what hull? My 310HP in the 95 196 only turns around 5,000, maybe a touch more on a good day.I used to spin 5,300 rpm when I ran the acme 224. I liked that prop but had it repaired again and it is not the same. |
94 Sport, 351 Pro Boss carb. The Sport rides a little less bow heavy than a Ski, probably worth a couple of MPH. My 422 has been repaired a handful of times, I'm sure that's not helping the RPMs stay down, either.
|
Posted By: MrMcD
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 10:57pm
Posted By: halfnelly
Date Posted: September-10-2020 at 10:57pm
TRBenj wrote:
*not the stock tach
|
Good eye, it was replaced about 6 or 7 years ago. Closest one I could get from NautiqueParts, I think.
|
|