Where did they get "2001" from?
Printed From: CorrectCraftFan.com
Category: General Correct Craft Discussion
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Discription: Anything Correct Craft
URL: http://www.CorrectCraftFan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5182
Printed Date: November-27-2024 at 5:48pm
Topic: Where did they get "2001" from?
Posted By: 88 Nautique
Subject: Where did they get "2001" from?
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 3:40pm
Does anyone know how Correct Craft chose "2001" as a model number? Through what years did they use the 2001 series?
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1657" rel="nofollow - My 88 Nautique
|
Replies:
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 3:49pm
The 2001 hull was built from 1982-1989.
Ive read the name comes from the overall length (with platform) of 20' 01". Not sure how true that is, though.
-------------
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:09pm
So would a "2001" be considered a 18'9" boat or 20'1" boat??? I'm shocked that the BFN is the same length, as they look so much bigger than the SN.
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:20pm
I would think technically its a 18' 9" boat since the platform isnt permanantly attached.
-------------
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:31pm
That's what I thought. For insurance purposes, I said 18'9".
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: 79nautique
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:32pm
My memory is that it was named that way because of marketing and nothing to do with the overall length. The hull for the next century wasn't it?
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=756&sort=&pagenum=1&yrstart=1979&yrend=1979 - 79 nautique
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:37pm
20th or 21st century? Then what does the 01 mean at the end of 20? If it's 21st century, then it would be a '90's boat. I think Tim is right and I recall seeing something about it on the2001.com.
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:41pm
http://www.the2001.com/index.php?module=prodreviews&func=showcontent&id=1 - 2001
It's the running length of the boat like Tim said.
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: M3Fan
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:42pm
In 1982, I wonder if it meant "your boat will have tremendous resale value as a wakeboard boat in 2001"
|
Posted By: TRBenj
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:47pm
79nautique wrote:
My memory is that it was named that way because of marketing and nothing to do with the overall length. The hull for the next century wasn't it? |
That would make a lot more sense. 20' 01" isnt even the running surface since it includes the platform.
-------------
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 4:56pm
M3Fan wrote:
In 1982, I wonder if it meant "your boat will have tremendous resale value as a wakeboard boat in 2001" |
That's a good one, M3. We're still seeing the 2001 models going for $12K-15K on this site. Hum, pay $19K in 1986 and sell for $15K in 2006?!?! Find me a truck like that! Now would that be American or Japanese?...D'oh!
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: 2_Nautiques
Date Posted: November-08-2006 at 8:20pm
Hey, I bought a 1978 Ski Tique new for $7,000. Used it for 10 years and sold it for $7,000 to buy my 88. Gotta love that
-------------
http://correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1160" rel="nofollow - 1988 Ski Nautique
|
Posted By: jon4pres
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 10:41am
Were these boats really 19k new in 86??
------------- http://correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1801&yrstart=1976&yrend=1980 - 82 2001
jon4pres@gmail.com
Fort Scott Kansas
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 10:55am
Yes, depending on the options. The deluxe interior and 454 option kicked it into the low 20's. The 454 HO added another $3,000. The Silver Nautique sold for exactly $25,000. So the range was from $19K to $25K for the '86's.
I know these prices, because in 1986, I dreamed about getting one. My Dad and I stopped into Denny's Marine in Grafton, MA and looked at them. No dice, my Dad didn't see the need in a $19K ski boat. So we bought our 1985 left over 8 HP Evinrude for our 12' Gamefisher tri-hull boat. That cost $800 at the time. For some reason, I thought $19K was reasonable for a Nautique, even though I was 13 years old.
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: nates78ski
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 11:50am
TRBenj wrote:
That would make a lot more sense. 20' 01" isnt even the running surface since it includes the platform. |
That doesnt really matter though, there are ALOT of companies out there that include the swim platform in the overall lenghths. I'm not really a fan of it, but it doesnt really make a difference...
Nate
------------- Nathan http://correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1463&sort=&pagenum=3&yrstart=1978&yrend=1978" rel="nofollow - My '78 Ski Nautique
<a href="http://photobucket.com/Nates78ski" rel="nofoll
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 12:15pm
Like the antenna on a sky scraper makes it taller.
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: nates78ski
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 12:56pm
haha yep!
Nate
------------- Nathan http://correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1463&sort=&pagenum=3&yrstart=1978&yrend=1978" rel="nofollow - My '78 Ski Nautique
<a href="http://photobucket.com/Nates78ski" rel="nofoll
|
Posted By: behindpropeller
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 1:23pm
Nautique2001 wrote:
Like the antenna on a sky scraper makes it taller. |
It does when you are a pilot!
|
Posted By: JEFF KOSTIS
Date Posted: November-09-2006 at 10:55pm
behindpropeller wrote:
Nautique2001 wrote:
Like the antenna on a sky scraper makes it taller. |
It does when you are a pilot! |
Or if you have to service it!!!
Jeff...
------------- MUSTANG COUNTRY
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1074 - 1974 Mustang 17
http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1093 - 1976 Mustang 17
|
Posted By: Nautique2001
Date Posted: November-10-2006 at 12:04pm
Yes, that's right, Jeff. You've got some serious balls my friend! Ever been zapped by lightning, Jeff?
Ken
------------- http://www.correctcraftfan.com/diaries/details.asp?ID=1052&sort=&pagenum=4&yrstart=1986&yrend=1990" rel="nofollow - Nautique 2001
|
Posted By: Keith
Date Posted: August-05-2008 at 7:59pm
For those of you who didn't see it already, I just posted the answer to 'Why 2001?' http://www.correctcraftfan.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=11485 - here .
Thanks,
Keith
------------- Former: /diaries/details.asp?ID=6170" rel="nofollow - 97 Sport Nautique 1994 Ski Nautique 86 Silver Nautique 79 Mustang
|
Posted By: eric lavine
Date Posted: August-06-2008 at 10:46am
I read an article on the costs of boating, it included the purchase of a new boat, and all the little details associated with owning and operating the boat and then it was divided by hours used. not necessarily a ski boat unless its an 2008
it equaled $500.00 per hour. i had a hard time swallowing that number
------------- "the things you own will start to own you"
|
Posted By: Kristof
Date Posted: August-06-2008 at 10:55am
eric lavine wrote:
it equaled $500.00 per hour. i had a hard time swallowing that number |
So do I... I wouldn't be able to afford it on my salary if that number were true.
I'm pretty sure my 89 doesn't cost nearly as much
------------- - Gun control means: using BOTH hands! - Money doesn't make one happy, but when it rains cats and dogs, it's still better to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle...
|
Posted By: Kristof
Date Posted: August-06-2008 at 10:56am
eric lavine wrote:
it equaled $500.00 per hour. i had a hard time swallowing that number |
So do I...
I couldn't afford boating if that number were true.
I'm pretty sure my 89 is not nearly as expensive
------------- - Gun control means: using BOTH hands! - Money doesn't make one happy, but when it rains cats and dogs, it's still better to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle...
|
Posted By: eric lavine
Date Posted: August-06-2008 at 11:51am
you run on propane Bobby Hill, just think if you ran it on gasoline
------------- "the things you own will start to own you"
|
Posted By: Kristof
Date Posted: August-06-2008 at 10:29pm
eric lavine wrote:
you run on propane Bobby Hill, just think if you ran it on gasoline |
Exactly...!!!
------------- - Gun control means: using BOTH hands! - Money doesn't make one happy, but when it rains cats and dogs, it's still better to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle...
|
|