Election 2012 Is Comming |
Post Reply | Page <1 1819202122 33> |
Author | ||||
Riley
Grand Poobah Joined: January-19-2004 Location: Portland, ME Status: Offline Points: 7952 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Those apples are consistent with who is as a person, unless of course you're bigoted against religous people. If he gets the nomination, the Left will make his religion a big issue. |
||||
phospher
Gold Member Joined: July-19-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I was starting to think Obama didn't stand a chance at re-election. But the more and more the GOPers talk and debate the more and more I think Obama can be re-elected again. |
||||
ononewheel
Gold Member Joined: June-21-2011 Location: B Status: Offline Points: 776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Oh, bad news about Christy. Even he thought he wasn't ready.
Now it's Cain Vs. Romney. Or anybody really Vs. Romney Grand Ole Party, huh.... I thought it was, Gladly Over Perry |
||||
ononewheel
Gold Member Joined: June-21-2011 Location: B Status: Offline Points: 776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Dang,
That is scary! Did she have his neck "stretched"? |
||||
C-Bass
Platinum Member Joined: November-18-2008 Location: Columbus, IN Status: Offline Points: 1248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Lee, I understand everything you just said, but you didn't answer/address my question even in the slightest.
|
||||
ononewheel
Gold Member Joined: June-21-2011 Location: B Status: Offline Points: 776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Wow, you put religion before the issues? Surprise the crap out of me...!!! Wait, I knew that. Here is a video for you, probably already saw it since it was on FOX, has Ann Coulter, who I know you think is a complete goddess to you, but maybe you haven't, considering it is a current issue. Wall street issue |
||||
phospher
Gold Member Joined: July-19-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Just so you're aware,Romney is a mormon. Christian perhaps but vastly different. :) How do those apples sit with you ultra conservative christians? |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Craig, Reason why it is so important is depending on what religion you may follow. I want all those things you said, I love to vote for my pocket book, and better this world in each in every way. Normally when we find evil in moral values in polotics or immortal decisions, we speak out against it because we know it is wrong in the eyes of our maker. We like to put 2-2 togther and feel it is vital and makes sence. Thus, the teachings of the bible and are founding fathers say so. This is why always vote for the repbulicans, they tend to follow the christian values and economic standards we look for. My 2 votes for the repbulicans, Bush, and McCain I am sure they followed the rules of "pro life" and christianuty! Obama and Richards where for gay rights, abortion clinics which shows immortal reasonings against Jesus and the Bible itself. "The gospel of Jesus Christ calls Christians to stand against oppression, all kinds of evil," he said. "Sometimes that means we must act." |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
C-Bass
Platinum Member Joined: November-18-2008 Location: Columbus, IN Status: Offline Points: 1248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I'm not trying to attack religion. I just wonder why the those "topics" are so important when selecting a president.
Lets "pretend" we're just finishing up year 8 of a 2-term president who managed to boost the US economy, improve education, healthcare, end wars, protect borders, lower taxes, and generally do everything which you view as "good" from a standpoint of a leader of the country. One day this make-believe president leaks to the media his stance on abortion (which he'd never before discussed), and his stance was the opposite of your own. What would you then think of his ability to be president? |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Yes sir steve..
|
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
62 wood
Grand Poobah Joined: February-19-2005 Location: NW IL Status: Offline Points: 4527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
... This is where "us Bible-thumpers" can not "pick and choose" what is right and what is not. It is a complete package. Unfortunately, a lot of the world does not see it that way. |
||||
C-Bass
Platinum Member Joined: November-18-2008 Location: Columbus, IN Status: Offline Points: 1248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I agree that ethical/moral values affect the economy, I disagree that the ones specifically stated have any affect. |
||||
62 wood
Grand Poobah Joined: February-19-2005 Location: NW IL Status: Offline Points: 4527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Ethical/Moral values do affect the economy... . |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
But they do make a difference when you are speaking on a national level. Not only do the pubbys have great economic plans, they have christian values as well. It matters to me, and many other Americans. BTW, The founding fathers made sure when they wrote the Declration of Independence, Bill of Rights, and even the United States Constitution to keep christianity and Jesus Christ above all because of the goverment and level of kings in goverment. Thus, king above all kings is Jesus Christ, this is why christanity and economics go hand in hand. Founding Fathers even founnd morals important when writing what we follow today. |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
C-Bass
Platinum Member Joined: November-18-2008 Location: Columbus, IN Status: Offline Points: 1248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Because those issues have nothing to do with economics. |
||||
OverMyHead
Grand Poobah Joined: March-14-2008 Location: MN Status: Offline Points: 4861 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Sorry Phil, I am running out of time to complete all of your homework assignments, But yes, the government demanded that banks lesson standards for loaning which allowed people of ALL incomes to to get loans they did not deserve, and although they did not originate the loans, the quazi government organizations Freddie and Fanny bought the loans to encourage the banks to keep making them. Freedie and Fannie recieved the largest chunk of the finacial bailout at 135 billion, with another bailout still to come, the CBO says the true cost will be 317 billion of tax payer money. |
||||
For thousands of years men have felt the irresistible urge to go to sea, and many of them died. Things got better after they invented boats.
1987 Ski Nautique |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
No, it is called the man that created me and you. If i am thinking it is called a christian. The man upstairs set a set of rules for us to follow. Has nothing to do with a holly rolling base. It is called morales bro. Or you must not be a believer in Jesus Christ?? This is where some of us split far away from polotics. How can you accept someone to make social judgement toward abortion(murder)Thou shall not kill, gay marriage(against pro life) or to make economic decisions for this country?? |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
phospher
Gold Member Joined: July-19-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
A dotted line connecting to the holly rolling base. |
||||
phospher
Gold Member Joined: July-19-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
...........yadda yadda yadda Now you have got to be kidding me? Ignorance is bliss. Please Please, I beg you, will you watch Charles Fergusen's "Inside Job"? It can be found on youtube or through netflix. A few quick points, the vast majority of loans during the financial crisis starting in 2000 were issued to higher income borrowers not the poor. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley act (ever hear of it??) dismantled depression era laws prohibiting bank holding companies from owning financial companies. Also, private lendors NOT government backed Fannie and Freddie issued the vast majority of subprime loans. Fannie and Freddie actually lost market share during 2005 and 2006 because they choose not to participate in a lot of these non-traditional loans. Please, watch Inside Job then let's have this discussion again. |
||||
C-Bass
Platinum Member Joined: November-18-2008 Location: Columbus, IN Status: Offline Points: 1248 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
It always cracks me up how a candidate's stance on guns, gay marriage, gays in the military, abortion, and a few others I'm sure I'm forgetting end up getting more attention than what I would consider more important issues.
|
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Bottom line with large corporations and small business. Too many tax hikes on them over 2 yrs and regulations that me and you do not know about. Promise!! Plus Obama care has companies pulling there reins and stopping the wagon to see what happens first. They gotta be on the safe side before investing in something. I would sit on profits too.
And Joe BTW, as you stated about what you do behind close doors is personal business. I totally agree with you, but when you go polotical with it or you are gonna make yourself loook a litttle ignorant, then I have problems with it. How can someone vote for someone though if he is a supporter of gay marriage, gay military, or...???? "In God We Trust" |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
you still need income
|
||||
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
||||
OverMyHead
Grand Poobah Joined: March-14-2008 Location: MN Status: Offline Points: 4861 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Wow joe, that was a long post with lots of points, Your concept of staying in the middle is for the most part a good philosphy, I will call it the sweet spot, and there is a sweet spot for everything. The guestion is what defines the sweet spot, and that is where you are fundamentally flawed in your logic. We of course need laws and regulations to keep a cival society,and a create an environment where businesses can operate with acceptable risks. Wecan also regulate too much to the point where a business simply cannot afford to comply or that the opportunity for profit is diminished to the point that the investment is not worth while. Businesses look at many factors when determining where to locate, including infrastructure,Stability (political, economic, social) costs (labor, raw materials, taxes, regulations). All of these need to be in a sweet spot to attract or keep businesses ventures. It is business that funds our nation, not government. All dollars in one way or another originate from business, so if a government wants to be funded it needs to find the sweet spot for business. The governments job is to create the conditions that business neeeds, and then let the businesses do what they do best. It is not the governments job to tell the busineeses what is best or to pick and choose winners. We currently have more regulations than we have ever had. From a regulation stand point are we in the middle or at the far end? Our government spending has skyrocketed,which will have to be paid for, are we at the middle or the far end?
You said the housing crisis resulted from a lack of regulation, I do not agree , it resulted from government telling the banks how to operate. Prior to Clinton banks would write loans based on a series factors that determined risk (income, debt, credit history....) they had found the sweet spot where they could loan out money with confidence that they would get a return on there investment. Banks had to write loans that they could hold or that someone else would be willing to purchase. Then along came the Clinton years, and the government decided that everyone should be able to own a house. The banks of course knew about their sweet spot and that in fact some people had no business owning homes,because they would or could not ever pay for them. This is a case where business knew what was right and just needed the right conditions to continue doing so, but the government wanted to meddle and tell business what they had to do. The government said that the banks had to lower the threshold and make riskier loans. THe banks said if we do that we wont be able to sell them and that it will cost to much to hold them, so the fed dropped interest rates below the real sweet spot, and the government agreed to purchase the bad loans through freddie and fannie. By telling (regulating) the banks to do what they knew was wrong the government created conditions where housing was now at an artificial premium (above its sweet spot) and banks could make loans with no risk to themselves (out of the sweet spot) and the government was on the hook for the results. This was all done for a few decades of very strong economyies under both republican and democrat leadership. A house of cards was baing built. In this case government pushed the housing market out of its sweet spot creating "the bubble". Bubbles are by thier nature waiting to burst, it takes time to fill a bubble but when it pops it happens all at once. Then what happens? Publically the same politicians that pulled the banks in front of congress to accuse them of red lineing now pull the same banks in front of congress to accuse them of preditory lending. More importantly behind the scenes the government spends billions bailing out the mess that they created by pushing the banks out of thier sweet spot to start with. The government does this over and over in different ways. Currently we are doing this by paying unemployment for 2 (maybe 3) years. we are maintaining an employment bubble rather than letting the labor market find its sweet spot. In do this states are being forced to raise the cost of unemplymet taxes on business increasing the cost of each employeed person. We also have the government messing with healthcare, for decades we have regulated every aspect of health care, it has not been a truely private industry for over half a century. We mandate that insurance companies pay for the newest drugs and procedures, for viagra, cosmetic surgery, fertility treatments, port wine stains,.... and then complain that the costs are to high and to few can afford it so we regulate it more and drive the costs higher, all on the backs of business. The government does employee millions of people but the government does not pay them, taxes pay them, taxes come from individuals who are hired by or run businesses. If the government is the soulution why not have them hire everyone in the country? If the stimulus is evidence of what a government created job costs we can figure over a million per job, times 300 milliom people, we could employ the nation for 300 trillion dollars, of course that would leave no private tax base, so we would have a 300 trillion dollar deficit. Business are not crying boo hoo when they complain of taxes or regulation, they are telling the government where their sweet spot is and warning of future behavior if the sweet spot is not maintained. Business is holding money because there is no incentive to spend it. When te government spends more the businesses have more reasons not to spend. A stimulus can work uder certain condition to create a sweet spot, but we stimulated ourselves into our current conditions, any additionsl spending pushes us farther out from where we need to be. Business does not need the government spending its money to create solar energy and wind mills that increase its energy costs by 30%. Business needs the govenment to drill and build coal and nuclear plants to provide cheaper energy so it can compete with the businesses in other countries tht are doing just that. As far as a political sweet spot, there was not tea party until Obama, Ried and Polosie began abusing their power on the left, they moved the country out of its sweet spot creating a space on the far right that needed to be filled to pull the country back towards the center. |
||||
For thousands of years men have felt the irresistible urge to go to sea, and many of them died. Things got better after they invented boats.
1987 Ski Nautique |
||||
JoeinNY
Grand Poobah Joined: October-19-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5696 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Thats funny thing to get all excited about Lee considering your new buddy Cain agreed with Obama that he and the other candidates should have stood up for the Gay soldier who has volunteered to risk his life to defend this country in wartime only to be booed at the debate while the candidates sat silent.
I guess your disgusted by him now too? The same people who just want the government to leave big business alone never seem to have a problem telling people what they can and cant do in thier own bedrooms. But all regulation is bad, unless it is anti immigration regulation, or anti union regulation, or regulation keeping gays out of the military, or tort reform .. Lack of regulation led to a global finacial meltdown, the crash of the housing market, a bunch of mines collapsing in the US (we shouldnt be competing with China for mine deaths), a bunch of oil in the gulf.. etc. But we need to reduce regulation to help the economy? I dont think all regulation is bad.. apparently neither do the republicans when they want to ban collective barganing or limit the amount of money you can sue your doctor for if he cuts off the wrong leg.. so why do they act like they hate all regulation when they are trying to be elected? Government cant create jobs, but governments employ nearly 20 million people in this country.. so by definition it created nearly 15 percent of the jobs in the country. You can argue government shouldnt create jobs but certainly not that it cant. This economy is suffering from lack of demand.. not over regulation, not overtaxation. The reason the deficit is a huge problem is that it limits the spending government can do to create demand. We are expected to believe the revised history that Reagan and Bush tax cuts turned around the economy but the reality is those guys both spent money on the family credit card the entire time they were cutting taxes. That spending had an effect on the economy, it increased demand..by definition. (Under bush the fed also tried to make the tax cut strategy they endorsed look better by keeping interest rates at zero even though they were causing runaway inflation in the housing market.. which with the lack of finacial regulations nearly destroyed the world) Tax cuts dont increase demand efficiently, never have never will.. are they more fair.. that can be argued, but to say they improve the economy as well as government spending is simply and basically false. Even if the multiplier was as high as it was with direct government spending... and it isnt, spending is by definition spent, and tax cuts are not necessarily spent. Obama's biggest failing has been that he put a stimulus package together he thought he could get it through a senate filibuster. That meant he didnt spend it.. he gave it to the private sector to spend it, and they didnt spend it. The very little bit of actual spending that he could get through did help the economy.. but when he was increasing the deficit by 700 billion he should have spent it all. That would have been real demand. If the fed interest rate isnt at zero you can lower it to create demand, but that doesnt work when it is at zero. Or you can argue that the government shouldnt create demand, which is perfectly reasonable thing to argue.. but then you cant blame Obama for the economy.. But its Obamas fault I cant hire people because i am uncertain of taxes and regulation, oh boo hoo.. garbage. Big corporations are sitting on record profits and all time high levels of efficiencies, they are also looking at a level of regulations that allow them to pay no taxes what so ever.. so that cant be the issue, they dont hire because they don't need to because there is no demand. If there was demand they wouldnt think twice about hiring to meet the demand. Small companies are crippled by health care costs.. (also a lack of demand) but if you try to pass regulation that keeps them under control that is unamerican.. All these guys are a joke.. none have put in the work to run the country. Some of these candidates are smart people but either they have no qualms about telling people what they want to hear to get elected, or they simply need to spend more time reading, studying, listening, or debating with an open mind. Otherwise they wouldnt contradict themselves so often. The right solutions for the country all lie somewhere in the middle.. I have said it before and I will say it again.. half the country isnt wrong all the time and half the country right all the time. Anyone who believes that half the country are evil freedom hating morons.. gives themselves a 50% likelyhood of being in the wrong half. |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Yes sir Greg... Down right insulting. And it is just these things like this. Obama is bashing the GOP for gays in the military. This makes me sick, only a democrat would do some horrile stuff like this. I dont care you are quir, or gay, but having reform with this gay crap is not accepted. They have to be judged one day not me, but look at this article. This is what I am talking about. OBAMA BASHING GOP for Gay military |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Eric, If you read the bottom of my post, I recieved a 3month severance pkge which did me fine. I just found a job last week, it is not what I want to do, but will work until the better job to come along. I did not file for Unemployment. |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
skicat2001
Platinum Member Joined: November-24-2008 Location: Ft. Worth TX Status: Offline Points: 1950 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Sorry for the angrer sometimes, but after the good guys lost to Obama in the election, I was like everyne else, I will give this guy a chance. I used to not HATE democrats this much, but after really seeing a full fledge lefty(liberal) at work on there polocies, I really hate the left with a passion now and can get quite angry,espcially if you read and listen to how they think running a country and literlally in the ground. They need to take Economics 101. Read the Constitution, and Declaration of Independence. Its very simple, but the left do not get it. I will in the future watch my anger a little more closer. Thanks Dave, I have learned lots from you and many others on this site. Thanks bro.. |
||||
1985 CC 2001-SOLD
Lee Michael Johnson |
||||
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
man, im just trying to make this a betterplace. Ive really had it with these fools in office, what is it to be an american? what does it boil down to being an american?
i really think the world looks at us as a powerful but dumb nation, weve slipped in education, manufacturing, we cant even take care of ourselves and then you got these fools fighting to get into power. |
||||
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
||||
62 wood
Grand Poobah Joined: February-19-2005 Location: NW IL Status: Offline Points: 4527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
.........somebody has to watch out for us... |
||||
OverMyHead
Grand Poobah Joined: March-14-2008 Location: MN Status: Offline Points: 4861 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Eric, I would agree, Which party is it that promotes individual liberty, and which tries to regulate every aspect of our lives, like smoking on private property? Or which light bulbs we use? Or what must be given to the poor? Or what kind of fuel we use? Or the gas milage of our cars? Or who has to wear a seatbelt or helmet? Or what our kids are taught? Or who we must hire? Or where we can put a cross or a tree? Or what we can eat? Or if we can cut down a tree on our property? Or where we can drive our boats? Or who must wear a PFD? Or......... |
||||
For thousands of years men have felt the irresistible urge to go to sea, and many of them died. Things got better after they invented boats.
1987 Ski Nautique |
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 1819202122 33> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |