Convice me, SNOB vs. Brendella |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | |
mdvalant
Grand Poobah Joined: May-06-2009 Location: Bellevue, IA Status: Offline Points: 2059 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Throwing wrenches in our theory Tim! |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21132 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The TBI PCM debuted in 1994, at least for Correct Craft. Its possible PCM offered it to other brands first... though it would be a little surprising if that were the case.
|
|
Jllogan
Platinum Member Joined: May-18-2011 Location: canton, OH Status: Offline Points: 1728 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
right says fuel injected not MPFI so thats probably TBI. Unless brendella had some early mover advantage on the PCM products (doubt it) or if it has been replaced but I figure if that were true the owner would be mentioning it.
|
|
mdvalant
Grand Poobah Joined: May-06-2009 Location: Bellevue, IA Status: Offline Points: 2059 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Guys, I think that Brendella will have the same motor as the sport. They all had Ford PCM's in them if I'm not mistaken.
EDIT: I do see he says the Bren is EFI. Maybe he's referring to TBI? |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21132 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
A '93 wouldnt have the multiport EFI GT40 engine... it didnt debut until 1995. If the '93 has the HO engine, its a 285hp carbureted motor. The only detractor for that combo is the Protec ignition, which cannot be repaired easily if it fails (you'd be looking at an ignition replacement at $400-500 instead). Otherwise, its a great running and performing engine- barely a tick off the performance of the GT40, as they essentially share the same longblock.
I have no experience with Brendella whatsoever. You will also probably find it difficult to get a totally unbiased opinion here. Correct Craft owners, and CCFan members in particular, are more passionate about their boats than most people. On average, theyre also more knowledgable about how these boats are put together. Other brands may ski great, but I'd rather drive a Correct Craft any day- and I wouldnt own anything else. |
|
Jllogan
Platinum Member Joined: May-18-2011 Location: canton, OH Status: Offline Points: 1728 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My guess is this is the brendella
I agree the fit finish will be the biggest difference between the two. Also after looking at some pictures of the brendella it does ride very bow low. Looks like any wave over 12 inches is coming in if you are not under power. The brendella wont have as good of resale but thats why its cheaper to buy than the sport. Just depends what you can afford I suppose. I would get the sport if you can afford but if the 10K is your max the brendella might be worth looking at. Also my guess would be that engine would be 285 mot 310 right? |
|
Morfoot
Grand Poobah Joined: February-06-2004 Location: South Lanier Status: Offline Points: 5312 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As a previous Procraft Fish-n-Ski boat owner with a 150 Mariner on it (yes I know it's a bass boat wannabe) I'd say go with the inboard sorely on the basis that you are wanting to cover all watersport aspects. My Procraft could do all three but it wasn't great at all of them and it sucked fuel. It was only a V6 but a trip to the lake for wakeboard runs and kneeboard runs depleted the 25 gallon tank. When I upgraded to the Correct Craft inboard with the 351, it sipped fuel as compared to the Procraft. I'd have 1/2 tank or more towing it home doing the exact same thing; wake and kneeboarding and that included added 600lbs of fat sacs.
Granted a Procraft is not a designated skiboat type hull but my outboard experience says they are good for going fast,gettin you to the next fishing hole, or barefooting/ pulling ski teams not for what you intend to do with it. If you drive an inboard or even ski behind one you won't even want to think about an outboard. Your wife will appreciate the handling as she is only turning a rudder, not the entire motor. In my experience women seem to be more intimidated and afraid driving an outboard as compared to an inboard. Having a wife who likes to drive the boat is a HUGE plus especially when it's your turn to hit the water. Another upside is the kids can drive easily too. |
|
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
|
|
mdvalant
Grand Poobah Joined: May-06-2009 Location: Bellevue, IA Status: Offline Points: 2059 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My family went from a 1990 Ski Nautique closed bow to a 2000 Sport Nautique with the Flight Control tower.
The sport is a bigger boat, it handles a little less sports car like than the 90 ski but compared to the boats you've had experience with you'd swear you're driving something that's on rails. The sport has storage under the open bow cusions, under the observer seat, a HUGE trunk, and a ski locker between the driver and passenger seat. The sport hull is basically a stretched NWZ (no wake zone era) hull that was standard on all Ski Nautiques from 1990-1996. This hull IMO is a superb all around style. Has a very flat ski wake at speed, the wakeboard/kneeboard wake is very smooth/rampy/clean, it'll go 42-45 capable of barefooting very comfortably. I throw 4-7 friends in the thing and we aren't cramped. I don't think the GT-40 310hp was std in 93 unless they dropped one in it after the factory. Correct me if I'm wrong other CCFAN fellas... |
|
cojab
Newbie Joined: March-14-2012 Location: Colorado Status: Offline Points: 12 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'll do more checking on the engine and hp rating. I remember the guy saying it was an upgraded engine. (Maybe the GT 40 Ive been reading about?)
You mention the versatility of the Sport. I like the sound of that. What are you referring to, the wake, the handling, or what?? My wife likes to ski, I like to kneeboard and who knows what the kids will end up wanting to do so I would love some versatility in the boat. |
|
mdvalant
Grand Poobah Joined: May-06-2009 Location: Bellevue, IA Status: Offline Points: 2059 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yea I'm onboard with Chris. Not sure I've seen an OB Brendella and 310hp seems fishy for a 93.
I can't say anything bad for Brendella as I have had zero experience with them. They do look kinda cool on occasion though. That being said, our 2000 Sport Nautique is one of my favorite boats of all time. Can't believe how versatile it is. Just googled some Brendella's...it does appear some of the ski brendellas's were OB in 93. Very interesting. To me, they seem Malibu-esque (cheap/uncomfortable to hang out in all day, etc) Again, this is all pretty bias and my opinion. |
|
storm34
Grand Poobah Joined: November-03-2008 Location: Dexter Iowa Status: Offline Points: 4492 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't think I've seen an OB Brendella so that's one major plus to the sport if you have a family.
They're two completely different boats IMHO. Sport will have a better fit and finnish and is a larger boat with the walk thru windshield and open bow. This is all correct craft bias, but for resale's sake I'd try and find a trailer and go with the open boat Correct Craft any day. Are you sure on the 310hp? |
|
cojab
Newbie Joined: March-14-2012 Location: Colorado Status: Offline Points: 12 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey guys, new here and not looking to start an argument, just looking for facts. I've owned a couple of jet boats and driven a couple of I/O's but never owned or operated an inboard. I am ready to get my next boat now and have always wanted an inboard.
Anyways, I am currently looking at a 1993 Sport Nautique 600hrs, open bow, 310 hp motor, ACME prop, very clean, not much else comes with it including no trailer which is a big downer for me. 10k asking price. I really like this boat but the trailer issue is killing me. I am comparing it to a 93 Brendella which is just as clean, 700 hrs, propass, and has tandem axle trailer, covers, bimini top etc. 10k asking price also. I fully expect some Correct Craft bias here, but can you guys tell me what's the pro's and cons between them. I heard the hull design on the Brendella is very low and it wants to submarine a bit. Is this true with the Sport Nautique Im looking at also? I will be using this for skiing, kneeboarding, and maybe some wakeboarding/surfing and just general lake cruising. Thanks. |
|
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |