Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fuel Requirements
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Fuel Requirements

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
skitique179 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December-06-2011
Status: Offline
Points: 176
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote skitique179 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Fuel Requirements
    Posted: March-15-2012 at 11:50pm
Hey Guys,

So I was thumbing through the PCM Owner's Manual the other night and came across the section on fuel requirements. I was surprised to see the section that said 93 Octane Leaded Fuel is recommended and not to use unleaded fuel...

Is this really required? I thought that you couldn't even buy leaded fuel anymore other than av gas?

Should I be putting an additive into the fuel for my 302 and is 93 Octane really required?

Thanks
Back to Top
SNobsessed View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: October-21-2007
Location: IA
Status: Offline
Points: 7102
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SNobsessed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-15-2012 at 11:56pm
No additives!     Waste of money. I use '87 octane non ethanol ( we still have that in Iowa, where gasahol was born, go figure).

If it doesn't knock, you are good to go skiing.
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

Ben Franklin
Back to Top
Keeganino View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-27-2009
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 2063
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Keeganino Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-16-2012 at 12:24am
I always use 93 in my 1973 Skier (Waukesha 302)which also calls for "High Octane Leaded Gasoline" Have never tried using lower octane and probably will not ever, but my engine is stock and has never been rebuilt. Modern gasoline already has components in it that take the place of the lead so there is no need to waste money on the additives as stated above.
"working on these old boats may not be cost effective but as it shows its what it brings into your life that matters" -Roger

1973 Skier
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41040
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-16-2012 at 8:36am
As mentioned, no additive needed. I've been running 87 in my 302 since I got it without any problems.


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
Jllogan View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: May-18-2011
Location: canton, OH
Status: Offline
Points: 1728
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jllogan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-16-2012 at 11:18am
I switched over to 89 but the PO always ran straight 87 in it and it ran fine.
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21118
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-16-2012 at 11:34am
Here is the excerpt from the '89 PCM manual. If you are pulling the "93 octane" reference from an older manual, read the fine print. It denotes the method used to define the octane (there are more than one). The verbage called out in the '89 manual is consistent with the current octane posting requirements, as far as I can tell.



Do NOT worry about leaded fuel (you cant find any), nor about lead substitutes (theyre a waste of money). Take the savings and put them towards a head job or new heads... it will be a while before you need it.

Personally, I run 89 octane, but I would think that with the ultra-conservative compression ratios that these engines run (~8.3:1), 87 should be fine as well. So long as you dont get any pinging (pre-detonation), youre fine.
Back to Top
skutsch View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-19-2008
Location: Racine, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 2874
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote skutsch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-16-2012 at 2:28pm
I run 93 Octane but only because it is the only way I can run non-ethanol gas, and then I have to look very hard to find it.

When I am in Iowa, I do revert back to 87 or 89, again because it is readily available with no-ethanol.

No knocking experienced with any of the fuels above.

Oh BTW, the Interceptor 312 (Ford)in the 63 Ski Nautique has also been running unleaded since the early 80's, usually 87 octane in that too. I know its not relavant to a PCM discussion...
Back to Top
Bri892001 View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-27-2008
Location: Boston MA
Status: Offline
Points: 4945
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bri892001 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March-16-2012 at 2:41pm
Ski dim has some verbeage about identifying heads and how no raised ribs indicates non hardened seats. It says to run lead substitute or Valvtech. Unfortunately the entire 3 paragraphs blinks

I understand that Valvtech is supposed to help for stabilizing fuel, but how would it help the valve seats?

Anyway, I feel that adding Startron, Valvtech or Marine Stabil, for the ethanol is good, but I agree not to worry about the lead substitute.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC