Forums
NautiqueParts.comGet Your 2025 CCF Calendar Now
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - A little different Stroker build
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

A little different Stroker build

 Post Reply Post Reply Page   123>
Author
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: A little different Stroker build
    Posted: May-07-2012 at 2:22pm
To say the least !
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-07-2012 at 2:07pm
Eddie, PLEASE buy this prop! Brand new Acme 431 on ebay for $235 shipped... smoking deal!

Acme 431
Back to Top
hotboat View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: March-28-2009
Location: Conn Lake Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hotboat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-04-2012 at 3:44pm
X2 uncomfortable feeling to say the least
Brian
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-04-2012 at 2:53pm
Originally posted by backfoot100 backfoot100 wrote:


The cavitation plate is actually more of a trim tab than anything else. It would be very easy to remove this for that little extra that all the speed demons are looking for ..




I would highly recommend not even trying doing that, not even once just to see the results... it may also function as trim tab and rooster tail shaper but it definitely also serves as a cavitation plate. The rudder extends well beyond the back of the boat and between that and it's relatively thick foil-like cross section it will very likely pull in air intermittantly at high speeds without that plate. That would result in intermittant inability to steer at high speeds, which I can from experience tell you is pretty much undesirable. Now, would I possibly play with a couple spacer washers on the front to level it out a bit....
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
jbear View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-21-2005
Location: Lake Wales FL.
Status: Offline
Points: 8193
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jbear Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-04-2012 at 12:36am
not sure what all the level stuff is about but...man you got shiny tips!



john
"Loud pipes save lives"



AdamT sez "I'm Canadian and a beaver lover myself"...
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-03-2012 at 11:18pm
Here is some interesting info.

I have been asked numerous times what the cavitation plate on the transom is for and if it's specific to the Barefoot Skier. I have always originally thought that the Barefoot model specifically had the plate well before Scarpa made it so popular but I have since found out that all AmSkiers have the plate.
After talking with Boat Doc and reading numerous posts about hull hook, I decided to break out the level and take a few pics.
As you can see, there is virtually no power robbing hook in my hull that is common place in the CC's.
The cavitation plate is actually more of a trim tab than anything else. It would be very easy to remove this for that little extra that all the speed demons are looking for without touching a belt sander and totally destroying the hull, gelcote and wake characteristics that make this a ski boat.
I can already see Reid, Tim and Joe calling dibs on who gets the next AmSkier that comes up for sale. They don't come along near as often as a CC does.

From the forward most portion of the base plate


From the end of the transom


From the end of the plate itself.


The angle of the plate in relation to the hull.



When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-02-2012 at 10:42pm
Tim and Joe,
I haven't forgotten nor ignored a 13x13 Acme. I absolutely agree with you that it's definitely worth trying. Believe me, it will happen.
Patience Grasshopper.
When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
GottaSki View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: April-21-2005
Location: NE CT
Status: Offline
Points: 3365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GottaSki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-02-2012 at 2:21pm
Originally posted by backfoot100 backfoot100 wrote:


Thanks Tom,
Yeah, it would be really interesting to get a new 13x14 federal and see what that prop does. That was my reasoning in trying the 13x14 Legend. My only dis on the stock prop is that it does have a lot of turbulence in the wake and the aforementioned slipping. Makes barefoot wake crosses difficult but not impossible. The Force and XMP both had distinctly smaller and smoother rooster tails observed from the boat. I would assume that would translate to a smoother wake table for crosses but have not been able to verify.
My daughter and I did do some slalom runs with the Force and the Legend. We both ski at 15 off which puts the rooster tail about 3 feet in front of the ski. Both of us noticed a smoother crossing so I have to assume barefoot crosses would be smoother also. It may just be the rebuilt prop creating the turbulence. Like I said, a new 13x14 federal would be an interesting try.


I think we are on the same page. I'm a slalom junkie too. I run the 4-force 13x13, and the wake is the best of the bunch, the roost wash is markedly low, flat and wide , vs narrow and high with the acme's i've tried.
However, it feels that if I worked the engine over to push 5krpm or more, there would be too much parasitics vs other designs to see superior speed with the force.
If the 4-force didn't exist, the federal would be on. The federal had some marginally superior wake charateristics at 28-30 mph for the family, but I like 34-36 and that was where the force really shines.
I also like how it launches, the revs fome up faster then it digs pulls hard. The force could make things a little frothy in the table above 40, I never foot behind my boat, and when i did it was a friends 2001 or sanger
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."

River Rat to Mole
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-02-2012 at 1:20pm
Originally posted by JoeinNY JoeinNY wrote:

Originally posted by backfoot100 backfoot100 wrote:


Brian and Alan,
I've heard several reports just like yours and I keep expecting those same kind of results but so far have been very disappointed. The XMP has so far been the most positive. Like Alan stated, that prop pulled really hard all the way through the RPM range like a sports car but just didn't have the WOT MPH. I keep expecting that magic bullet that gives me 57MPH like you talk about. I don't know if my expectations are too high or just haven't found the magic bullet yet. It's been a learning experience for sure.


You keep expecting the same kind of results but you havent tried the same prop yet... Spoiler Alert!!!! it is the 431 acme. It was by far the best prop for a hot motor 1:1 direct drive for me, alan, and now we hear from brian the same story. (430 for them and 431 for me but they are all the same just different directions).

My thoughts exactly! If Joe's beat up 541 was still the 2nd fastest prop, even though it put your RPM's way past your peak hp level, then imagine what a prop of similar design, in new condition, that turns a more appropriate RPM will accomplish! That 431 is going to be the hot ticket, like we've been saying all along.
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-02-2012 at 1:04pm
Originally posted by GottaSki GottaSki wrote:

Excelent build, well done.
Lot of people crap on it, but I found a late-model Federal to be a very good prop on my supreme, which is not not a distant stretch from your hull.
Had superior efficiency, wake, and roost characteristics to many more exspensive, modern props.


Thanks Tom,
Yeah, it would be really interesting to get a new 13x14 federal and see what that prop does. That was my reasoning in trying the 13x14 Legend. My only dis on the stock prop is that it does have a lot of turbulence in the wake and the aforementioned slipping. Makes barefoot wake crosses difficult but not impossible. The Force and XMP both had distinctly smaller and smoother rooster tails observed from the boat. I would assume that would translate to a smoother wake table for crosses but have not been able to verify.
My daughter and I did do some slalom runs with the Force and the Legend. We both ski at 15 off which puts the rooster tail about 3 feet in front of the ski. Both of us noticed a smoother crossing so I have to assume barefoot crosses would be smoother also. It may just be the rebuilt prop creating the turbulence. Like I said, a new 13x14 federal would be an interesting try.
When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
jbear View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-21-2005
Location: Lake Wales FL.
Status: Offline
Points: 8193
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jbear Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-02-2012 at 1:50am
man I love listening to you guys.

here's what I know..its very fast and loud...pulls awesome from a dead stop to 41. will hold that speed for as long as you can foot. no side spray on the boom. just love gettin' to drive this boat every saturday. now all we gotta do is find someone to drive me, Eddie and someone else for some deepwaters.


john
"Loud pipes save lives"



AdamT sez "I'm Canadian and a beaver lover myself"...
Back to Top
hotboat View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: March-28-2009
Location: Conn Lake Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hotboat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-01-2012 at 12:42pm
A little late now but as you experiment take note of prop to hub, prop to rudder and prop to hull clearance, some feedback there would be good to know. Any ill handling from any of the props at speed? I assume you boat has tracking fins?
Brian
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-01-2012 at 12:39pm
Originally posted by backfoot100 backfoot100 wrote:



Brian and Alan,
I've heard several reports just like yours and I keep expecting those same kind of results but so far have been very disappointed. The XMP has so far been the most positive. Like Alan stated, that prop pulled really hard all the way through the RPM range like a sports car but just didn't have the WOT MPH. I keep expecting that magic bullet that gives me 57MPH like you talk about. I don't know if my expectations are too high or just haven't found the magic bullet yet. It's been a learning experience for sure.





You keep expecting the same kind of results but you havent tried the same prop yet... Spoiler Alert!!!! it is the 431 acme. It was by far the best prop for a hot motor 1:1 direct drive for me, alan, and now we hear from brian the same story. (430 for them and 431 for me but they are all the same just different directions).

1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-01-2012 at 12:20pm
Joe,
Thanks for the feedback. My eyes have been opened quite a bit so far. I keep thinking why wouldn't more guys want to take out cup and add pitch. If the engine has the torque to spin it you would think that you'd get more overall performance. When you talk with prop guys, they insist that you need the cup or the boat shakes itself apart. I have to disagree at this point but I'm far from expert at this stage in my testing. FWIW, my stock prop slips and shudders horribly when you get on it but it's still the fastest prop to date. It immediately spins up to 5K+ RPM, shudders a little bit and starts to walk a little bit to the right but it still tries to pull. Virtually all of the other props tested (except the cupped Force) pull hard with very little slip but fall short on WOT MPH.
I'll take your prop along for the AmSkier reunion and let some guys try it out with their stock motors. I'll bet there are more than one who will want to keep it. If you do want to sell it, let me know what you want for it and I'll keep you posted.

Brian and Alan,
I've heard several reports just like yours and I keep expecting those same kind of results but so far have been very disappointed. The XMP has so far been the most positive. Like Alan stated, that prop pulled really hard all the way through the RPM range like a sports car but just didn't have the WOT MPH. I keep expecting that magic bullet that gives me 57MPH like you talk about. I don't know if my expectations are too high or just haven't found the magic bullet yet. It's been a learning experience for sure.

Dave,
My ears were ringing that weekend. I had a feeling there were some very heated discussions going on.

When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
GottaSki View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: April-21-2005
Location: NE CT
Status: Offline
Points: 3365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GottaSki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-01-2012 at 12:19pm
Excelent build, well done.
Lot of people crap on it, but I found a late-model Federal to be a very good prop on my supreme, which is not not a distant stretch from your hull.
Had superior efficiency, wake, and roost characteristics to many more exspensive, modern props.
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."

River Rat to Mole
Back to Top
81nautique View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-03-2005
Location: Big Rock, Il
Status: Offline
Points: 5796
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 81nautique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-01-2012 at 10:54am
Originally posted by hotboat hotboat wrote:

Very similar to my experience as well, with the 540 I was 5800ish and 54-55 mph and after going to th 13x13 acme 430? i think (same as Alan) went to 5200-5400 and 57-58 mph


I would have to agree with this entirely, the 541/540 lets the motor run away with no gain but the 430/431 prop is the ticket. Brings the rpm down and in my case gained slightly on mph but most of all felt like a sports car through the entire rpm range. Very grippy and responsive, never felt like it was losing any bite no matter how hard you mashed the throttle.
You can’t change the wind but you can adjust your sails
Back to Top
The Godfather View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: August-13-2008
Location: Orlando Fla
Status: Offline
Points: 1766
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Godfather Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-30-2012 at 9:08pm


We were talking about your boat at WLM2012....
Jbear, said to me wow if it was'nt for this site we would never had met for this to happen....
Back to Top
hotboat View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: March-28-2009
Location: Conn Lake Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hotboat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-30-2012 at 9:08pm
Very similar to my experience as well, with the 540 I was 5800ish and 54-55 mph and after going to th 13x13 acme 430? i think (same as Alan) went to 5200-5400 and 57-58 mph
Brian
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-30-2012 at 7:54pm
I wouldn’t sell mine to anyone with 53mph at 5900rpm I would suspect that ding on there is not insignificant.   Hold onto it for a spare, if I make it down that way sometime I will take it back with me.

No surprise to me the cupping has proven pretty much useless, I have had similar results every time out.. it lowers the rpm but makes the boat significantly slower. Whenever anyone trys to sell me on a prop with more cup these days they lose my interest but quick.

I would say that you have confirmed for me what a few here including myself have guessed from the start.. an acme 431 would make you a nice prop that would probably have you at your 5500rpm and 55 mph- nothing a bunch of money can’t fix.   

A good legend 13x13 might work out pretty well but it doesn’t seem like it would be significantly different than the stock federal you have which apparently is a pretty good rework.   
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-30-2012 at 6:57pm
Sorry about the delay here Joe. I missed this post for some reason and I don't know how.

I have had a chance to run it and test some props. So far they've been less than hoped for but still working with OJ to try different flavors.

Here's where I'm at so far:
All of the speeds are GPS results.

Stock Federal 13x12 that has been rebuilt and repitched to 13x13
55MPH @ 5800RPM

OJ XMP CNC 13x12.5
Uncupped   52MPH @ 5900RPM
Cupped     53MPH @ 5500RPM

OJ Force 13x14
uncupped   53MPH @ 5700RPM
cupped     50MPH @ 5300RPM

OJ Legend 13x14
cupped   51MPH @ 5100RPM

Acme 13x12 CNC (Joe's Prop)
53MPH @ 5900RPM

It's pretty amazing what cup does to the results. Much less RPM and MPH except for the XMP. It gained a MPH while losing 400RPM. They've all had good to impressive holeshots and pulled well all the way through WOT. The only one that really sucked was the Force after it got cupped. That lost a lot through the entire RPM range.
John wasn't available while testing most of them to feel what differences they had while pulling a skier or doing wake crosses. That would have been really interesting. So I really only have top speed and RPM numbers to go by right now. All of them have had no felt vibration at all.

Overall, I've been less than impresssed when you talk about top speed numbers vs. the stock prop. I just think that I should be able to find something that shuold do 55MPH at someplace around 5400-5500RPM. Maybe my expectations are too high. I don't know. The XMP was good and pulled really hard but still a couple MPH short. The Force set some really high expectations to start but after getting cupped, fell flat on its face.

I'm currently waiting for a lesser cupped Legend to be sent back to me. So that's where I'm at to date.

FYI, I'm going to an American Skier reunion in June and if you're interested, I'll take that Acme prop of yours along and I'd probably be able to sell it for you. I know you said it has just been collecting dust in your shop. I can either send it back to you or if you want me to try and sell it, let me know how much you want for it and I'll see what I can do. Thanks so much either way for letting me try it out.

As always, I welcome any input that you might have.


When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-19-2012 at 6:36pm
Brother Eddie what's going on with the Barefoot Skier? Surely you have had a little time to run it by now?
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5698
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 10:35pm
Originally posted by Hollywood Hollywood wrote:

300hp DXII seemed to like the 13x12 Acme.

Joe, still kicking that 431 around?


Sadly no, at least not in usable condition.   I bent that one worse than any prop I have ever seen.   I do have a 541 in good shape though - be happy to bring it to the river run if he can wait that long
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 7:20pm
Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:

Eddie, the description sounds great- cant wait to see the pics (theyre not visible here at work).

As far as props go, I dont think Id spend a dime having a prop repitched. Its just going to fatigue the metal and increase your chances of flexing the blades at higher RPM. Best case, that doesnt happen- but youre still running an old-school hand finished prop. I think you'd be worlds happier with a modern CNC prop (Acme or OJ XMP). Exactly what size works best will depend on where youre making your peak power- have you plugged your numbers into some dyno software to see where that may be? For reference, the 383ci Response Barefooters come with 13x13 Acme's, so that might be a good starting point.

Ive struggled against motorbox height on a few different boats. Whats your plan for raising it up? I raised the box on our BFN by adding more glass to the bottom lip of the box. I went the other route on my '90 and reduced the height of the engine with a lower profile arrestor. Eliminating the carb spacer is another option. A 2" tall arrestor might prevent you from having to build a stand for the box though- you can find them out there if you look. If I remember correctly, the K&N's were close to 4" tall when I was looking a few years ago.



The K&N that I got technically isn't an arrestor. I initially thought it was and when I got it I thought it was strange that there was no mention of the word "arrestor" anyplace on the box. I went back and looked online to verify. Mad Marxx had the same one that he put on his boat years ago. Just missed that. This was the only K&N that I could find with a flat top on it. All the other K&N's have a higher top plate that adds about another 3/4" yet on top of this one.

I'm not sure if you can see it, but if you go and look at some of my emgine pics (either before or after) if you get one that you can see the bottom of the cover, there is actually a strip of wood attached to the bottom of the glass that goes all the way around the cover. The upholstry wraps underneath it and then staples to it. The wood is probably 3/4"x3/4" roughly. I still don't know for sure how it actually attaches to the glass. I assume that it's just screwed in. My intial plan is to just remove the old wood and replace with some wood trim that's a couple inches taller. I might have to do something like maybe a little glass for strength but I won't know for sure until I get into it. Shouldn't be a huge deal but then I said that when I started this three years ago.

As far as the prop, I fully intend on getting a new CNC prop. There is no question aboout that. I just want to get the engine fine tuned and dialed in as best I can before I do that. I've never really done too much with props before but when we were playing with different props on John's boat, it was like night and day. I have to believe that this could be the same scenario. I'm expecting some significant performance increases with the right prop.

Yes, I've plugged in the numbers into my desktop dyno and I'll have to revisit where the peak power was at. I seem to remember something in the 4K RPM range but that was a while ago and I ran several different scenarios.
When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
Hollywood View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: February-04-2004
Location: Twin Lakes, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 13520
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hollywood Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 5:21pm
300hp DXII seemed to like the 13x12 Acme.

Joe, still kicking that 431 around?
Back to Top
Jllogan View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: May-18-2011
Location: canton, OH
Status: Offline
Points: 1728
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jllogan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 5:04pm
whats your plan for raising the cover? You going to add some kind of trim piece around the bottom?
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 4:52pm
Eddie, the description sounds great- cant wait to see the pics (theyre not visible here at work).

As far as props go, I dont think Id spend a dime having a prop repitched. Its just going to fatigue the metal and increase your chances of flexing the blades at higher RPM. Best case, that doesnt happen- but youre still running an old-school hand finished prop. I think you'd be worlds happier with a modern CNC prop (Acme or OJ XMP). Exactly what size works best will depend on where youre making your peak power- have you plugged your numbers into some dyno software to see where that may be? For reference, the 383ci Response Barefooters come with 13x13 Acme's, so that might be a good starting point.

Ive struggled against motorbox height on a few different boats. Whats your plan for raising it up? I raised the box on our BFN by adding more glass to the bottom lip of the box. I went the other route on my '90 and reduced the height of the engine with a lower profile arrestor. Eliminating the carb spacer is another option. A 2" tall arrestor might prevent you from having to build a stand for the box though- you can find them out there if you look. If I remember correctly, the K&N's were close to 4" tall when I was looking a few years ago.
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 4:17pm
Originally posted by Jllogan Jllogan wrote:

very cool! I like that K&N flame arrestor too, really tops it off. The lid still wont go down even with that on there? I thought it was lower than the stock one.



No, it's actually about 3/4" higher.
The stock one is even too high now. When I had the Performer Air Gap on the 350, the lid would close but it was really close to hitting the flame arrester. I mean the inside top of the cover has scratches on it from where it was ever so slightly rubbing.
The RPM Air Gap is only about a 3/8" taller than the Performer Air Gap but thats more than enough to hit it. I also had to put on a different angled carb adapter that is also just a touch higher than the stock one. They all start adding up.

I figure raising the cover 2" will give me more than enough clearance.
When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
Jllogan View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: May-18-2011
Location: canton, OH
Status: Offline
Points: 1728
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jllogan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 1:47pm
very cool! I like that K&N flame arrestor too, really tops it off. The lid still wont go down even with that on there? I thought it was lower than the stock one.
Back to Top
backfoot100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: January-03-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1897
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote backfoot100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 1:07pm
Just a little info so everybody is on the same page.

I haven't had a chance to do any tuning yet except for the timing and idle adjustments. I'm in the process right now of wetsanding, buffing, polishing and waxing the hull. What a pain in the butt so far but the results are just too cool. I need to do some fine tuning and plug chops. I haven't opened it up for more than 20-30 sec. at a time until I know it's not going melt a piston. So far, removing a few plugs to see what they look like has been promising. The cam documentation says that the cam has a noticable idle which is a term fpr it. Not uncomfortable or rough, but definitely noticable. It's not buttery smooth like it was in stock form. The 20-30 sec runs have so far been impressive though. When you get on it, it does a pretty fair job of sqeezing you into the seat. By the time you check the oil pressure and temp, the tach says 5700 and both speedos are pegged. I have yet to even GPS it. The prop is just a plain stock 13x12 federal that has been rebuilt and repitched to 13x13. I have another pretty chewed up 13x13 that I want to rebuild and repitch to 13x14 for the hell of it and see what that does. I plan on doing a fair amount of prop testing. I know that it can do much better. As it sits right now, I can't wipe the smile from my face and it's only gonna get better I'm sure.

When people run down to the lake to see what's making that noise, you've succeeded.



Eddie
Back to Top
PAPA View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: October-06-2009
Location: Fremont, In
Status: Offline
Points: 202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PAPA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-26-2012 at 12:54pm
That engine looks awesome. Nice job. I hope it runs as good as it looks.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page   123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2025 | Bagley Productions, LLC