Separating a Stuck Coupler |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May-08-2010 at 2:11am |
Ok, I am trying to do my first alignment check. After I bought the boat I had it checked out, and the shop was supposed to check the alignment, but I don't really think they did.
My coupler looks pretty rusty and it has been at least three years. So naturally the coupler is stuck to the tranny. I did some searching on this site, and found a recommendation to use PBblaster, and a metal putty knife with a hammer to separate the coupler. I have been trying that but with no success. To be honest, I have not been hammering that hard. Is it ok to hammer pretty hard? I don't want to bust something. I also saw in this thread thread to try an old wood chisel. Is it really ok to hammer with an old wood chisel? And again, can I really hit it hard? I have a nice big hammer. If that doesn't work, eric levine said to try a torch and an air hammer. But I can't tell if he was serious. An air hammer seems like a good way to break something. But again, I have one. Thanks for any advice you might have Jared Here is a picture of my rusty coupler from two years ago |
|
Jim_In_Houston
Platinum Member Joined: September-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You are saying "coupler" but you are showing a picture of your shaft log.
A torch and air hammer will work best but applying a flame to anything in or near the bilge area is pretty scary unless you really know what you are doing. The heating will help separate the two coupling halves and the vibration of the air hammer is more effective than prying or blows from a hammer. Eric is right on. But you will need a lot of heat to heat the coupling quickly. I recommend you continue to soak the coupling with a good penetrating oil and try to drive a wedge between the halves. I have never used PBblaster but there is a product on the market named Kroil which has worked miracles for me and I have had better results with it than any other. You can order it from Amazon.com. Did you loosen your packing nut so as to allow your shaft to slide backwards when the coupling splits? Be patient. You may have to soak the coupling for a few days. I think your best bet is penetrating oil, patience, a wedge (like a wood chisel) and a large hammer. Try the Kroil. |
|
Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang
|
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared,
JIH is correct - coupling or packing gland?? You say the picture is from 2 years ago but it shows attention is needed to the packing. It's been overheated from running too tight. If it is the packing nut you're trying to remove, keep in mind it's two pieces. The big "nut" towards the trans and then next to it aft is the hex jam nut. You need to break the jam nut loose first. Was it repacked since the picture was taken? Moving farther aft, you'll see the shaft log. This is the metal connection to the glass hull. Is it still fastened firmly to the hull? It almost looks loose in the picture! |
|
Brady
Senior Member Joined: June-28-2008 Location: Lake Elmo, Mn. Status: Offline Points: 226 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
scroll right guys and you will see the coupling
|
|
Charlie
Three Lakes, Wisconsin 69 Barracuda |
|
LaurelLakeSkier
Senior Member Joined: February-12-2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 485 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The coupler is pretty rusty but there looks to be a white index mark on it....maybe it was checked????
|
|
79TiqueRebuild
Senior Member Joined: January-21-2009 Location: Kansas City, Mo Status: Offline Points: 238 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared, Did you remove the 4 bolts holding it together?
|
|
SNobsessed
Grand Poobah Joined: October-21-2007 Location: IA Status: Offline Points: 7102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared - If I were you I would get a 2X4 wedged under the coupler so that you can hammer/chisel without putting any shock load into the tranny bearings. If you ding up the flange surfaces they can be filed back flush. Have at it, give it some persuasion with a BFH.
|
|
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”
Ben Franklin |
|
behindpropeller
Platinum Member Joined: July-31-2006 Status: Offline Points: 1810 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared-
Drop the front end of the motor using the mounts. The line on the coupler is where somebody indexed it. Nice safety wire job on the coupler. Tim |
|
|
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I see you're becoming quite the computer expert! I did scroll right but used the page scroll and not the picture scroll!! |
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
for the life of me I cant figure out why people mark the couplings...it is necessary on 6" shafts and big couplings, because on the big stuff, the prop coupling/ transmission coupling are mated and reamed as a set
not so on these |
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for all the replies. This picture was taken a couple of years ago when I was working on the shaft packing-- hence the focus on the shaft packing.. As you guys noted, I had apparently over tightened it causing the packing the fail. I just bought some new gore tex packing from skidim, so I am about to try that again.
I did remove those four bolts on the coupler. I will try my air hammer. I have a cheap harbor freight air hammer with a chisel. I think that might actual be safer than using a BFH. I will report back. Jared PS-- Are the coupler bolts supposed to be stainless? I think I will replace those while I am at it |
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Now that you mention it, I have always wondered about my shaft log. I does not look good. It really does not look good from under the boat. But it has worked for the last four years, so maybe it ok. I really just have no idea.
|
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Good news. I got the coupler separated. It was actually pretty easy once I got a wood chisel. I did not have to hit it very hard.
So the next issue that came up was how to far it needed to be separated to make sure it was free. I ended up separating it to about 1/16 of inch. See the picture. So then I had to push it back to measure the spacing. I was not sure how to that, so used a bit of hammer and an aluminum drift. It was pretty easy to close the gap. Now on to measuring. Can anyone give some advice. I have a shim tool, but it is really hard to tell what fits and what doesn't. What is the correct technique for using the shims to measure the gap? I basically just kept putting in larger shims until they would not go in any more. But that is tough, because I am not sure how hard to force the issue. So can anyone give me some specific advice as to how to accurately measure with shims? My current best guess is that the alignment seems pretty close top, bottom and starboard, but that the port side is too close. I would say it was about .010 or .008 too close on the port side (compared to what I was getting in the top, bottom, and starboard). But I would like to try it again if someone could tell me the best way to use shims. Thanks Jared |
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared,
The actual measuring of the gap top to bottom side to side has confused many. This is the part of Eric's alignment thread that really needs clarification. You're looking for a difference between these measurements of no more than .003". What you are really doing is checking parallelism which in turn checks how straight ("true") the prop shaft runs in relationship to the trans shaft. Measuring with a feeler gauge is as the name implies by feel! When inserting one of the gauges, you need to "feel" the same force/resistance. The actual thickness of the gauge doesn't matter as long as you keep in mind the .003". However, lets say one side of the coupling faces are touching. If you are able to get the .004" gauge between the halves on the opposite side, then your alignment needs attention. If the faces are not touching, a example would be if you get .010" on one side and .014" on the other the parallelism is off the same as above. The closer you get the difference to zero the better the alignment. |
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Pete, confuse and conquer....
maybe Kieth can unlock the thread and we will finely hone the topic, touch and measure, but i can see by the pics up top he is not touching and measuring and i could see clarification is needed |
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
OK, I took your advice, and did some more measuring. I basically swapped out different size shims until the friction going in and out felt the same.
Doing this, I got a gap of .008 larger on the starboard side than on the port. The top and bottom was about half that-- maybe .004 larger than than the port side. Although it might be a little tighter on the bottom, it is tough to measure the bottom gap. So now what do I do? I am guessing I want to move the front of the engine a tad to to the starboard, but I have NO idea how to do that. I am going to go check the PCM engine manual, and the alignment thread, but any direction would be appreciated. Jared |
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared,
Yes you've got the idea. Moving the front of the engine over starboard will tighten the gap on that side. It will also shift the flange centerline to port so you need to watch that. In Eric's thread, there's some pictures showing the mounts and loosening the "pinch" bolts so the engine can be shifted sideways. |
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here are pictures of my engine mounts. Based on what you guys are saying, I just need to loosen up the pinch bolts on the two front mounts and move it slightly too starboard. I don't need to mess with the back mounts. At least not yet.
That seems like it would be easy enough, but it also seems like it would be hard to move it very precisely. After all, I only need to move .008 . It seems like it is going to be hard to only move it that amount-- and that it would be easy to overshoot it. How do you avoid overshooting? Starboard front mount-- with arrow to the pinch bolt I need to loosen: Port front mount -- with arrow to pinch bolt Starboard back mount Port Back Mount |
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No, you'll need to move the front end more than .008 to get that at the coupling. If you trig it out, you can get a rough idea. I'd do it for you but I flunked trigonometry!! |
|
behindpropeller
Platinum Member Joined: July-31-2006 Status: Offline Points: 1810 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Only loosen the pinch bolts on one side. You can then load the motor one way and then loosen the opposite side a touch and tap with a brass hammer until you get it close.
|
|
|
|
Okie Boarder
Gold Member Joined: August-31-2009 Location: OK Status: Offline Points: 779 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared,
I just got done doing this on mine and it was more difficult than I thought to shift mine over. I got some PB Blaster in the shanks where the motor mounts slide. A crowbar worked well, and I also used a 4 x 4 post piece that I tapped. When it struggled to move, I loosened one side, and loaded it up, then tightened. Then I loosened the other side and "tapped" out the loading, like was just mentioned. You keep working it until you get it right. I got mine to .002" difference. |
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
why are you hitting it with a hammer and using a pry bar? is it out two three inces? I doubt it. All you should be moving are the jack screws on the four mounts, that is what the square head is for, loosen the jam nuts crank on the jack screw, tighten the jam nut back up and call it a day. don't understand why everyone need to slide it this way and that way, if the engine was out and you didn't pay attention to the alignment when you took it out then maybe, but usually they are only off less than an 1/8 of an inch, lets all work harder than smarter and turn an easy job in to a major PIA |
|
Okie Boarder
Gold Member Joined: August-31-2009 Location: OK Status: Offline Points: 779 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Mine required the front to move about 1/4"-1/2" to get it right. I may have been a little off on the measurements on my rebuild. I would agree that just realigning without a rebuild probably doesn't require that.
|
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There is a jack screw for moving the front of the engine left and right? That is what I need to do. I don't see such a screw, but I haven't really looked yet. Jared |
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jared,
I feel Chris is confused and consequently confusing you. Alignment does often involve ups and downs as well as side to side. Yes, the up and down is via threads on the mounts but the side to side does involve loosening the pinch bolts and sliding the mount on the mount rods. It's just like Eric in his thread explained. |
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
actually it's really hard to tell exactly what direction it truely needs to go if your using a feeler gauge, To get a true reading you should be using a wire gauge and probe all around, your just checking in 90 degree incruments vertical and horizontal so that is why you view it that it needs to go right or left or up and down for that matter when in actuallity it's above or below those points where it is the widest gap so dropping one mount or another gets you to the desired alignment. If your only looking in the horizontal or vertical plane then that is all you are going to try and adjust, but that isn't the true picture and thus Why I don't view alignment in those terms or methods, you can leave the blinders on if you want, I don't own a set.
|
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Chris,
A wire gauge? Get out of the stone age!! I'm not flying in a plane equiped with one of your RR engines anymore!! |
|
sjpitts
Senior Member Joined: April-16-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
So is there anything special about these bolts? I want to replace them when I am done. They look like ordinary stainless to me. But I am not really sure if they are stainless.
Jared |
|
behindpropeller
Platinum Member Joined: July-31-2006 Status: Offline Points: 1810 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WHy do you want to replace them? |
|
|
|
79nautique
Grand Poobah Joined: January-27-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Pin Gauge Pete, point is find the widest gap no matter where it is located circumferencely, you rotate 90 degrees to determine a bent shaft or coupling flange. If the coupling is true to the shaft and the shaft has zero runout and on the transmission coupling if it is true to the output shaft then the gap doesn't move regardless of rotation of either. Correct?
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |