Debt

I didn't say he was my guy...but I do think he is most able to get something done in that LA-LA land inside the beltway; if he's electable.

Who said that those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it? I bet Newt could outdo the other 7 combined on American History. I also liked him standing against the media. Bachmann had a chance on that submission question, and while she handled the question with all grace, she might have set her own tone.

IMHO Santorum looked like a cry baby, Romney looked like a cat with a canary in his mouth, Bachmann seemed overly rehearsed, Huntsman could only get out that he was going to run on his record, Pawlenty couldn't get his 7 & 8 cylinders to fire, Cain seemed politically inexperienced, and Paul was over the edge as usual even though he was right most of the time.

Right now, I'd pick Herman or Newt for different reasons.

The best part though is we all know BO was watching...must've been hard for him. I wonder how many hankies he went through.   

i sat back and, watched them bicker amongst themselves, and thought to myself, business as usual...lying thieving bastards, tell you what you want to hear and you buy into it

Eric, just think what could be done with all of the creative efforts wasted on being tax savvy. Build a reasonable environment for buisnesses to function in and they will come.

thats like my kid saying, i didnt do it, she did it
kinda hypicritical...I just found out Frank was a pipe smoker, really, i didnt know that, not that it matters hah hah

Greg, their lips were moving, thats how you know they were lying

it seems the world is a more peaceful place when the dems are in office

eric lavine wrote: if we could only figure out a way to tax them damn drugs coming into this country, 15% accross the board, on everything? seems to be a thriving business, could use some good old regulation

Can you say FairTax?

eric lavine wrote: it seems the world is a more peaceful place when the dems are in office

C'mon...where are you getting your news?!!? I haven't seen so much unrest in this country in my 40 something years. WI PA IL ...shall I go on?

ononewheel wrote: Do you realize you arguing against your own best interest, as well as your family and more than likely your friends too?

You hand me this when I am late for work. hold this thought and I will respond tonight.

the only way the fairtax would ever work is if they did away with currency, and went to a completely electronic system, that could be REGULATED

So, this fairtax, would it make the rich oilmen down there in Texas pay their fair share? or are we focusing on the poor people not paying their share?

I really liked newt and the guy from Iowa. They mean business. Romney is a liberal conservative. I smell something fishy with him.

now wouldnt a nice import tax really improve things? in my eyes that would be fair

BuffaloBFN wrote: Every limo would be taxed the same as a yugo. Also, the FairTax doesn't have a play in the sale of used goods or the trading of anything.

That is nice. Limos at eh same rate as a Yugo. Fairtax. Yeah sure.

That is like taxing the bicycle the same as a Leer jet, saying the both are simply transportation.

Or the Mansion the same as a small crakerbox house.   You have enough money to live in a house which has 4 more rooms than you'd ever use, takes more space, is a bigger user of energy,.... You get the high tax rate, or you get the crap taxed out of you.

Fairtax is crap.

ononewheel wrote: BuffaloBFN wrote: I didn't say he was my guy...but I do think he is most able to get something done in that LA-LA land inside the beltway; if he's electable. Who said that those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it? I bet Newt could outdo the other 7 combined on American History. I also liked him standing against the media. Bachmann had a chance on that submission question, and while she handled the question with all grace, she might have set her own tone. IMHO Santorum looked like a cry baby, Romney looked like a cat with a canary in his mouth, Bachmann seemed overly rehearsed, Huntsman could only get out that he was going to run on his record, Pawlenty couldn't get his 7 & 8 cylinders to fire, Cain seemed politically inexperienced, and Paul was over the edge as usual even though he was right most of the time. Right now, I'd pick Herman or Newt for different reasons. The best part though is we all know BO was watching...must've been hard for him. I wonder how many hankies he went through.    No offense, but I'd bet Barack Oabma, was using the hankies because he was laughing so hard he had tears in his eyes. Do you think the republican party is saying anything different than they ever have been? Not that many dems are either, but it has been more of the same.   I could have told you about everything the debate would have been about. In a nutshell.... No taxes, never ever, forever, never ever, not from any American ever ever, at all costs, I'd rather tha nation fails than tax, ever forever never....... Obama is going....to....be.....a....one....term.....president!!!!!! (spoken in that Bachmann, prose) Government is bad, smaller at all costs, I hate the gov...... Thanks for watching the debate.

I honestly doubt barrak hussen obama was laughing. Because he is so screwed, people are feed up and his approval rating is almost at 30%. That being said, look what has been put on his watch.

Outragoues spending in History
Unemployment stayed at 9-10%4
Welfare programs up 18%
Higher taxes for those making more than 250,000 which is not dumped back into the economy.
S&P lower credit rating because of the "NR" Spending
Moral issues against the United States Constitution for "Same Sex maariage" Poll showed will be on ballot and is disaproved



Barrak is a "One Term" President. I promise you that. The only peps that will revote for him are need there head checked. Far far far lefties like himself.

Remember lee, some of those democrats are our friends here, make your point but play nice!!!!!