A buffalo’s first bowtie |
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 22> |
Author | |
87BFN owner
Grand Poobah Joined: August-25-2006 Location: Saline, MI Status: Offline Points: 2194 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Check your valve covers before buying roller rockers, you may not have enough clearance under the stock covers. I have not tried roller rockers yet on 454. But I have seen some roller rocker set up that require more room then the stock sety up. I know with the hi-teks on I can not goto a larger valve cover. I know the stock manifolds sit very close to the valve cover so check your clearance there before buying new covers.
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks 87, I did ask and he said they were fine with the stock covers. I noticed on summit that some of the roller rocker sets have 2 that are shaved to fit under the stock covers, so I guess it can be an issue. I also have a wee bit of space to work with now and will be using exhaust gaskets when it goes back together and so will gain that much more.
I haven't decided yet if I want to keep the stock look or not(I already changed the tranny to black). 1 change that looks nice is the valve covers. I read where chrome retains heat,but I did see some nice cast aluminum covers with the bowtie on them that claim to be stock height. I'm not a big Clemson fan...not against them either. I say that because my boat is blue on grey and I was thinking of going with chevy orange?!!? LOL |
|
80 Ski-Tique
Newbie Joined: November-21-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Don't cheap out on the roller rockers, the stock rockers will last a LOT longer than cheap china made roller rockers. I have had bad experiences with cheaper ones, the pushrod cups come out, the bearings fail, and the aluminum is a very poor grade. Either put new stock rockers with good poly locks or buy a set of good name brand made in the usa rollers.
|
|
80 Ski-Tique
Newbie Joined: November-21-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
BFN, I may be a newbie here but I have worked at a race shop for the better part of a decade. I realize that your motor is not a race motor but you are looking for a long service life. Either cam type you use will be fine if it is properly set up, use quality components, and just as importantly, broken in correctly. By the way, you may already know this but Mobile 1 changed their synthtic formula a couple of years ago and we are not seeing as good of results as the old formula. We used to use Mobile 1 but after testing the new formula we switched to Valvoline VR-1. Just thought that might be useful to you.
|
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
80 you might fit in here...
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the tips Andy, and welcome aboard. The scorpion rockers are 'cheap chinese'? Right now, I'm waiting to get my parts back from the machine shop...hopefully next week. Any opinions on the demon carb?
Edit:I looked the scorpion rockers up..."Made in the USA...and Proud of it!" is their logo. |
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
greg there is a town in Japan named usa...
i find myself checking labels on everything nowadays as to where it is made, no commy crap, or tiawan crap |
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Greg, Ive read that Crane makes some of the best rockers. Scorpion is also very good, especially for the price. I run the Cranes (rebranded as FMS) and JoeinNY runs the Scorpions. Ive heard very good things about Barry Grant carbs. They are supposed to be based on an improved Holley design, and use some of the same components (jets, etc). On a mostly stock rebuild, Id stick with a new Holley if theres a significant price advantage- but the Marine Demons are very nice units if you want to pony up the $$$. |
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
They are a little more $$$, but my reasoning was that the demons seem to be a little more user friendly. I've seen the many threads on carb adjusting. I'm still considering the holley as well because of the factory hook up and look. I still have to decide how important that is to me. |
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
im a holley guy all the way too, easy to work on, reasonably priced, Ive tried many other carbs in the past and always came back to a holley, my motto with a holley is ...set em and forget em.
the biggest thing with carbs is sizing them correctly, its better to have them to big then to small, i would imagine with what your doing Greg you would need an 780 to 850 cfm, check the carb issue out thouroughly because it really is a big dollar purchase, there is a ci to cfm chart to get you close and then on a holley its easy to change your jets |
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Wow, that big? You did see where I'm going back to stock on everything? ...except it will be 30 over and I'm looking at the edelbrock performer intake(idle to 5500 rpms). Did it have the 650 or 750 from the factory? |
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
go by the guide, the throat of the carb is where they determine CFM, it can be a restriction if to small, you are upping the comp ratio? if so they need more air,intake? more air.... thats why its important to size the carb, I threw those numbers out there because i use 780's on 383cubes and they are perfect. there is a carb guide if you search the web to tell you CFM's to cubes. dont go by what im saying, Id just hate to see you add all thiese goodies and not have enough carb.....
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
you cant change cfm on a carb but you can change fuel delivery, not enough cfm then your screwed and the engine will fall on its face. do some research on sizing it for what you are doing
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I used this calculator.
I entered 454ci, 5000 for max rpms, and left the %83 VE. The results were 656.829 cfm @ 100% VE...545.168 cfm @ user % VE I must be leaving something out or not compensating for something? I also went through the holley carb finder. It came back with the 4160/750cfm, but with vaccuum secondaries. It was my understanding that 'we' wanted the mechanical secondaries? |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Try the CFM calculator again with 100% VE. That will give you the worst case (highest CFM youll need). I believe the 330hp 454 PCM's came with 650cfm carb's. Check the list number on your stocker to verify. I would think that the 750cfm carb that Holley recommended would be pretty sweet. You want the vacuum secondaries, not mechanical. |
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think you're right about the stock carb being a 650. I don't have a 'stocker' to compare to. It's had an edelbrock 600 on it since I've had it. The CFM calculator said 656.8CFM @ 100% I also saw where Gottaski? said that raising the CFM size would extend the range where the primaries are effective. I've done a pile of reading and only really have a little of it sorted out. On the barry grant demon site, the transmission was the determining factor in mechanical vs. vacuum secondaries...but no marine info. I think I understand why several have reccomended the vacuum for this application; guess I just had mechanical in my head. It's so that the secondaries aren't forced open when they aren't needed? And maybe because I don't need to get to 8000 rpms in a hurry? I'm still deciding on the carb brand...JR VIC? seemed very happy with his demon as are many of you with the holley. I didn't see a deal breaking price difference, and the demon looks to be easily adjustable w/o taking it apart every time. All of my stuff is supposed to be ready this afternoon! |
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21186 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You may have already checked this thread where I asked the vacuum vs. mechanical secondaries question. Pretty clear that we want vacuum on our ski boats.
I dont think you can go wrong with either the Holley or Barry Grant carb. If the price difference is negligible, Id be inclined to go with the Demon, as its supposed to be a little more efficient. |
|
80 Ski-Tique
Newbie Joined: November-21-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Just my two cents worth, but me and my friends have not had the best of luck with Barry Grant's carburetors. We had one 850cfm double pumper that, tuned at it's best state was almost 75h.p. short of our "test carb" wich was a Blake modified Holley. Again I realize that you aren't looking for all out h.p., but who can afford to lose that much power and economy. That was a few years ago but not an isolated issue because we know of at least 3 other customers, all with slightly differt carbs, that had the same problems. My opinion, from my experiences, is stick to a Holley, and if you want it a little better, send it to a specialists like Blake, but a box stock one is pretty good for all general purposes.
|
|
80 Ski-Tique
Newbie Joined: November-21-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
By the way BFN, on the roller rockers, I will admitt that I am not familiar with the Scorpion brand. As I stated all we see is race engines which are for endurance- circle track racing. About the only brand rockers I see on these engines are Jesel, Crane, or Competition Cams. The Scorpions may be o.k., I don't know. I have seen even some "name brand" rockers have some serious issues, Harland Sharp for one. If it was mine I would either put new stock replacements or one of the brands I listed. If your using a stock or near stock cam you won't see hardly any h.p. difference unless you change the ratio. If I was buting new rockers I would go up on the ratio a tad, you will see more benefit from that than the roller by itself. The main benefit of a roller rocker in a mild motor is of course the reduced friction but more inportantly for you is that the valve guides will live longer since they will no longer experience a "side load" like they would with stock rockers. Hope some of this helps you.
|
|
JoeinNY
Grand Poobah Joined: October-19-2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5698 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Scorpion is currently the largest US manufacturer of roller rockers. I have two sets of the stock ratio small block ford ones in my correct crafts. They are built on automated robotic production lines, have a lifetime warranty and I have never heard of a single failure from anyone running them. Having said that if you are planning to have someone else build the engine for you I would go with whatever brand they recommend and sell for the most part. The builder will be your primary source for support and warranty issues and if something doesn’t go well its best to have him on your side and working with vendors he knows to get things corrected. I have edelbrock, holley, and barry grant marine carbs, but I don’t have a big block chevy so I can only speak to the generals. I have a newly rebuilt 650 holley and a just about new 750 holley on the shelf I would let you test out when your ready if you wanted to cover shipping. On my 302 for the mustang I run a 600 cfm edelbrock and on my 408 in the nautique I run a 650cfm marine demon. They are all good carbs I gained a little bit on the top end with the demon over the holley but the demon I have has no choke horn so I suspect that to be the difference, sizing and tuning will be way more important to performance that the brand in my experience.
-Joe. |
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks Joe, that's quite an offer. I appreciate that and the information. In the end, a test might be the final answer. I do have good news; I found a chevy guy! He's a nice guy in his 50's and says he has been building engines since he was 14. He has a basement shop not unlike my woodshop and sells specialty parts that are just under the price I could get from summit+shipping. Even better, he's a carb guy as well. The only downside(and only by a little bit) is he isn't really a boat guy, but he did say right off that I'd want a carb with vacuum secondaries. <--Tim
He did have a bit to say about carbs. He doesn't 'carry' any. It's a small outfit and he orders for the job. He also doesn't seem to have a favorite...said he'd tune any to be just right. We talked about holley, edelbrock, barry grant, and quick fuel tech. I didn't know of the last one. Anyway, I'm leaning to the holley 650. He thinks that's plenty, but I'd still like to hear from some others here with more boat experience. We also talked intakes, and he likes the performer for my set-up. On the scorpion rockers, they're in my machinist's race car, Joe's words are comforting, and the chevy guy(Ben) likes them as well. It's all coming together and I'll put up some pics when I have something to show. |
|
87BFN owner
Grand Poobah Joined: August-25-2006 Location: Saline, MI Status: Offline Points: 2194 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Buffalo,
The HO 454 came with a 750 on it. That is one think that I will be doing on the BFN this spring, getting rid of the 650 and replacing with a 750 holley. I feel the motor has some more to give just lack fuel and air mixture. |
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I could get the 750 and tune it down if needed, but I can't get more air from a smaller carb. That might be the better way to go and I think it was Eric's point earlier.
|
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
it just seems like a 650 is too small for a BB, a 850 would be to big and a 750 would be just right, same as the old prop adage... i think i would go with the 750,
carbing an engine is a science too, it is also trial and error, I ran a 65o then to a 750 on one of the first strokers we built and it fell flat, it ran out of air in a hurry, by chance a friend had a 780 holley that he kept insisting that i try because he told me it needed more air and of course i didnt believe him, so i slapped it on and fired it and i tell you what, that engine came to life and since then i always prefer the 780's on the 383's, everyone told me a 780 was to big and i agreed, i dont think you'll have a problem with the 750 on that big block. with the 650 and 750 on that engine it huffed black smoke on throttle and i re-jetted 10 different times and couldnt understand for the life of me why it was running rich...it ended up that it wasnt getting near enough air and the 780 cured the problem |
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
A holley 750 it is then! ...with the performer intake.
|
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
we need some more details on what your hanging on the engine and what comp ratio and so on, what was done with the heads? did you get the engine back?
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes, I have my parts back from the machine shop. I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know the comp ratio; it seemed to be a non issue after I bailed on the roller cam(I'll ask about that today). The heads have been cleaned and rebuilt to stock. The cam is stock, and I'm adding the roller rockers. I have speed pro hypereutic pistons spec-ed for marine use and a full set of fel pro marine gaskets.
The block is clean with brass casting plugs and steel gallery plugs. He checked the line and surfaces and balanced the crank. He also installed the cam bearings like you said. |
|
eric lavine
Grand Poobah Joined: August-13-2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
what ratio rollers?
|
|
"the things you own will start to own you"
|
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
1.7 My new parts like those rockers are still new and could be changed if I have something wrong. |
|
BuffaloBFN
Grand Poobah Joined: June-24-2007 Location: Gainesville,GA Status: Offline Points: 6094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
And just to confirm, it's bored 30 over.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 22> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |