Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - ZDDP Question
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

ZDDP Question

 Post Reply Post Reply Page    <1 234
Author
rosconole View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-10-2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 759
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rosconole Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-03-2018 at 5:59pm
I guess I need another boat for a litmus test, 2 is not enough!
1989 ski nautique ,1991 barefoot nautique, 1993 Mustang Cobra 1998 5.0 Magazine shootout invitee
Back to Top
curiouslibra View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: January-10-2018
Location: Dallas Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote curiouslibra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-03-2018 at 9:25pm
just when I thought this thread was starting to slow down, I found this test that was very eye opening on ZDDP levels and how they are not the only factor in protecting your engine.
I also post this link because they also test ZDDP additives and none of them helped! in fact they reduced the protect and sometimes by a big percent!
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/showthread.php?136304-What-oil-brands-offer-the-best-protection-***Good-read***
W
i
l
l

"Don't argue with idiots, onlookers will not be able to tell the difference between the two of you, as the idiot drags you down to their level and beats you with experience."
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 11111
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-03-2018 at 9:49pm
Originally posted by curiouslibra curiouslibra wrote:

just when I thought this thread was starting to slow down, I found this test that was very eye opening on ZDDP levels and how they are not the only factor in protecting your engine.
I also post this link because they also test ZDDP additives and none of them helped! in fact they reduced the protect and sometimes by a big percent!
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/showthread.php?136304-What-oil-brands-offer-the-best-protection-***Good-read***


I figure that before you post what you think is some groundbreaking earth shattering news you should read the whole thread here on CCF and you'll find the same link you just posted.

Look at a post by phatsat67 on Nov 8th of last year

ZDDP/zinc/phosphorus levels fall pretty easily into that category of "things that there's no firm answer to"
Back to Top
rosconole View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: May-10-2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 759
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rosconole Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-03-2018 at 10:11pm
Alot of those private label oils that thread listed are total garbage I wouldn't use them on a mountain bike chain. .

It could all be a ploy to sell oil too...lots of snake and alligator oil.

However a wear test is really a better indicator, zinc is really for break in oils typically , probably in marvel mystery oil , zmax, too.

Some of the marine oils were actually made or spec'd for certain inboard i/o manufactures for example Mercury wanted a 25-w40 ,
1989 ski nautique ,1991 barefoot nautique, 1993 Mustang Cobra 1998 5.0 Magazine shootout invitee
Back to Top
curiouslibra View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: January-10-2018
Location: Dallas Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote curiouslibra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-04-2018 at 6:28am
Oops sorry I missed the link. I was just more concerned with the poster that said he used Lucas ZDDP additive to bring up his ZDDP levels but the test show that it did more harm than good and since I didn’t see anybody tell him to go look at the chart I assumed no one had already posted that here sorry.
W
i
l
l

"Don't argue with idiots, onlookers will not be able to tell the difference between the two of you, as the idiot drags you down to their level and beats you with experience."
Back to Top
Duane in Indy View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: October-26-2015
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 1578
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Duane in Indy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-04-2018 at 8:23am
Originally posted by curiouslibra curiouslibra wrote:

Oops sorry I missed the link. I was just more concerned with the poster that said he used Lucas ZDDP additive to bring up his ZDDP levels but the test show that it did more harm than good and since I didn’t see anybody tell him to go look at the chart I assumed no one had already posted that here sorry.


Think you are confused about what product you are talking about. The study tested a different product than what I had posted. I have no factual information about where the Lucas product rates.
BTW I can't recall reading where a CCF person has experienced a camshaft failure due to oil related issues.
Pete you are right: it's a cold hard winter


Keep it as original as YOU want it
        1978 Mustang (modified)
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 11111
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-04-2018 at 9:29am
Originally posted by Duane in Indy Duane in Indy wrote:

Originally posted by curiouslibra curiouslibra wrote:

Oops sorry I missed the link. I was just more concerned with the poster that said he used Lucas ZDDP additive to bring up his ZDDP levels but the test show that it did more harm than good and since I didn’t see anybody tell him to go look at the chart I assumed no one had already posted that here sorry.


Think you are confused about what product you are talking about. The study tested a different product than what I had posted. I have no factual information about where the Lucas product rates.
BTW I can't recall reading where a CCF person has experienced a camshaft failure due to oil related issues.
Pete you are right: it's a cold hard winter




Hi Duane

Here's a thread from 10 years ago with some people who had camshaft failures for various different reasons that they blamed on oil. Was it really the oil's fault? .I figure oil has changed some but not much has changed in the last 10 years as far as discussions go and in the next 10 the same discussions will continue. .

old thread

I guess some people will think the sky is falling and some will figure it's a mighty small percentage that had problems

Back to Top
63 Skier View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-06-2006
Location: Concord, NH
Status: Offline
Points: 4269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 63 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-04-2018 at 11:02am
I'm on my 4th cam already, and I've changed fluids regularly.

'63 American Skier - '98 Sport Nautique
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-06-2018 at 7:32pm
No scanner so this is the best I could do with the digital camera.

I ran across this Texaco oil ad in 1951 Motor Boating. Interesting they used a CC 42' flying bridge cruiser!!

Ken,
What do think the ZDDP levers were back then? Note, Texaco hadn't even come out with their Havoline oil yet!!



54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
SNobsessed View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: October-21-2007
Location: IA
Status: Offline
Points: 7102
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SNobsessed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-06-2018 at 8:15pm
Guessing that the valve springs on that '51 flat head were not high strength!
“Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

Ben Franklin
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-06-2018 at 8:31pm
And rpm's compared to today was low. Good old non detergent oil so all that gunk wasn't circulating around the motor but instead settled to the bottom of the pan
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 11111
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-06-2018 at 8:35pm
That's like ancient times Pete.

Anybody born in the early 50's or earlier is really OLD. You and Gary and Duane and oh yea, me come to mind Can't forget JBear,his brother Bill, Jackie Deen,SNObsessed, a really really old guy named Grant and I'm sure quite a few others that I just can't remember right now

Or is it experienced?

But anyways, I asked Google and came up with the article in the link. It was printed in 2009.

It would suggest 300 ppm or .03% for corrosion back then and then it was jacked up to 800 ppm in the mid 50's for camshaft wear reasons.

I figure it's interesting reading and probably won't really change anybody's thoughts that they already have about ZDDP levels and what's needed or not needed.

There have been changes like SN rated oils and CJ-4 and CK-4 diesel oils since it was written



link
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41045
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February-06-2018 at 9:05pm
Originally posted by SNobsessed SNobsessed wrote:

Guessing that the valve springs on that '51 flat head were not high strength!

The two cams I saw without some of the lobes were out of Hercules/Chris flat heads that in both cases the owner thought he was doing the engine good by going to "modern" oils.


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page    <1 234
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC