Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sport Nautique or Sierra Supreme
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Sport Nautique or Sierra Supreme

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
robertbruder View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-16-2009
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 335
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote robertbruder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sport Nautique or Sierra Supreme
    Posted: April-02-2019 at 11:18pm
I am looking at buying a late 80's Early 90's inboard.

Have owned in the past 1984 Barefoot Nautique, 1986 Correct Craft Martinique and 1984 Ski Supreme.

I am currently looking for an open bow that I can put a wake board tower on.
My budget is approximately $10,000.00

I was thinking of an early Sport Nautique 89-90 as my target.
I am aware of the wood stringers in the early Sport Nautique's.

Locally there is an 88 Sierra Supreme for sale that I have arranged to take a look at.
I was happy with my 84 Ski Supreme however this was more of a slalolm wake than a wake board wake. My understanding is that in 84 the Supremes did not have foam and therefore the boat was lighter producing the slalom wake but that the wake characteristics are different in an 88 Supreme?

Also I read on here that Supreme was using composite stringers after 87.

Based on the Sierra Supreme being lower in price to a comparable Sport Nautique and the idea of composite stringers it seems like a relative deal.

Is there something I might be missing or overlooking when comparing the two?
Current: 1988 Sierra Supreme
Past: 1986 Correct Craft Martinique, 1984 Ski Supreme, 1984 Bare Foot Nautique
Back to Top
hal2814 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: June-20-2016
Location: Bedford, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 76
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hal2814 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-03-2019 at 10:48am
The 1992 and older sport hulls are noticeably different from the 1993+ hulls. There are lifting strakes up front and the back looks different and not just because of the integrated platform. I’m not sure what that does to the wake characteristics but it will be different than the later hulls.

The Sierra Supremes look nice. I saw an ad for one back when I bought my 2001 but the owner wanted way too much for it. You probably won’t find the same level of info on it as you would a Sport Nautique but I wouldn’t hesitate for the right price.

As far as foam vs no foam, that’s noting adding more ballast can’t fix.
Back to Top
GottaSki View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: April-21-2005
Location: NE CT
Status: Offline
Points: 3365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GottaSki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-03-2019 at 11:14am

Regarding supreme, i can add the 84 was the last of the wood stringers and open cavity. 85-on were composite and foam filled

The sierra can throw a big wake when slow, it will be very different than your 84 was.

"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."

River Rat to Mole
Back to Top
robertbruder View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-16-2009
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 335
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote robertbruder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-03-2019 at 12:53pm
Thanks for the feedback and confirmation!

It sounds like if going for a Sport Nautique I would need to up my budget and for a later model year.

As long as the floor and stringers are solid on the Supreme I will probably go that direction and start saving for a Sport Nautique or SAN.

Thanks again!
Current: 1988 Sierra Supreme
Past: 1986 Correct Craft Martinique, 1984 Ski Supreme, 1984 Bare Foot Nautique
Back to Top
stepper459 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June-17-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 349
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stepper459 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-16-2019 at 1:03pm
I've ridden a lot behind my friends' 90 or 91 Sport Nautique. The biggest difference between the wake of that boat and the later ones, in my opinion, is the width - the distance wake-to-wake is less at the same line length as compared to the later hulls. The shape is really similar, and it throws a decent wake with a bit of ballast (they run fat sacs on both sides of the engine). With the integrated swim deck and sloped transom, it was also pretty easy to take a wave over the transom when running ballast. Still, it was a pretty good wakeboarding setup for a direct drive.
Back to Top
rolleronariver View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: May-24-2016
Location: Rogers, AR
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rolleronariver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-16-2019 at 6:29pm
I have a 92 sport nautique. I have installed a center ballast and we add fat sacks to both sides of the engine for wake boarding. It throws a very good wake like that for a direct drive. We do occasionally put on more fat sack in the very back and add a surf wedge for those occasions that we want to surf. The surf wave isn't bad if that's your thing. You can easily throw the rope in and do 360's and whip it pretty good. I'd just much rather be on a wake board. Either way, the pre 93 sport nautiques are still great for wake sports!
92 Sport nautique
Back to Top
rolleronariver View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: May-24-2016
Location: Rogers, AR
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rolleronariver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-16-2019 at 6:30pm
Also, I shopped around and found mine in Texas for $8k. I replaced the stringers and did a few minor things and we love it so they're out there for under $10k. We also have perfect pass which is a must for wake boarding imo. It has really saved my marriage!
92 Sport nautique
Back to Top
Blamey View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: August-18-2015
Location: White Plains,NY
Status: Offline
Points: 631
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Blamey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-18-2019 at 3:28pm
I bought a 1995 Sport Nautique for $7000 (no trailer). So you can find deals. Trailers can be hard to find though. Use search tempest or similar to search craigslist in a wide area.

I also picked up a 1996 Super Sport for $10,500 based on a post on here.

Both boats ran fine without any major issues other than some bad vinyl that cost me around $1000 to fix on both boats.

I can't compare them to the supreme but I loved the Sport Nautique. Apart from storage space, it was an amazing all round boat. My favorite overall boat of the ones I have owned (Ski Supreme, Sport, Super Sport and SAN 230).
96 Super Sport
Previously: 95 Sport Nautique, 1980 Ski Supreme
Back to Top
robertbruder View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July-16-2009
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 335
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote robertbruder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-30-2019 at 2:43pm
That is an awesome price for a Super Sport, I definitely want to move into a V-Drive at some point.

I ended up buying the 1988 Sierra Supreme and have started another Topic for Supreme owner's as Supreme is now part of the Correct Craft family.
Supreme Owner's Forum
Current: 1988 Sierra Supreme
Past: 1986 Correct Craft Martinique, 1984 Ski Supreme, 1984 Bare Foot Nautique
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2025 | Bagley Productions, LLC