Time for a heater... |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tim, I don't feel your logic is flawed and Gary's is. There has to be another reason for the restriction.
|
|
8122pbrainard
Grand Poobah Joined: September-14-2006 Location: Three Lakes Wi. Status: Offline Points: 41045 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
KENO
Grand Poobah Joined: June-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11112 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well the way I see it is....
If you tap off of the intake manifold right before the thermostat for the driving force and you tap back into the system with the return water going into the inlet of the circulating pump either through the connection on the pump or thru a tee on the inlet to the circulating pump like in the Heatercraft instructions the driving force to provide flow is only due to the differential pressure across the circulating pump. That differential pressure is not much at all at idle speed so there's not much flow to the heater core . Now if you hook into the suction of the raw water pump with a tee for the return water from the heater (like Gary has done) you have a higher differential pressure because the inlet to the raw water pump is under a vacuum whenever the RWP is operating. As far as the restriction, at least logically you would think that .......... Small hole = more restriction= less flow=lower temperature Big hole=less restriction =more flow= more heat But it seems like there's that age old argument about the fluid spending enough time in a heat exchanger to transfer it's heat the best (depending on a lot of design factors). Heatercraft seems to say the hole size was derived from testing with no real explanation of the testing. I kinda figure that if I had 2 of the y fittings, I'd drill one out to a bigger sized hole and try it for myself ( and use a valve before the wye so I could have a "variable sized hole" in that return line that could be adjusted for best heater and cooling system performance. I guess it seems like I agree with Pete who agrees with Tim on the flow and maybe we're all a little curious about the hole size and how it was derived |
|
KENO
Grand Poobah Joined: June-06-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11112 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For a real world example that we're all familiar with Some auto heaters use a flow control valve to vary the flow through the heater core and when you move the control to hotter, the valve opens allowing more flow and the temperature goes up. You don't go in the cooler direction and lower flow to raise temperature. Lots of vehicles these days use blend doors on the air side and constant flow on the coolant side, so this doesn't pertain to all vehicles, but you should get the idea. |
|
GottaSki
Grand Poobah Joined: April-21-2005 Location: NE CT Status: Offline Points: 3363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I can report I'll loose heat if idle speed in gear is around 650, around 750 the heat returns, and plenty of it.
When I place the core at feet level, no loss of heat occurs at low idle I imagine with a t return to raw inlet, the still- warm return water is diluted with the main flow, and most these btus dumped out the exhaust, very little return heat makes it back into the engine replacing the exiting water, like having a stat bypass putting cold water into the engine continuously The orifice could possibly inhibit higher flow the core would see under nonidle conditions. |
|
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."
River Rat to Mole |
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |