Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - POURABLE STRINGERS
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

POURABLE STRINGERS "a no brainer"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page    <12
Author
SkiBum View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: November-17-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SkiBum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2006 at 11:33am
The SeaCast website breaks it down like this:

o 5ea self-leveling 5 gallon buckets $866.18
o 10ea 2.75oz tubes of BPO catalyst $ 65.00
o 5ea 1oz tubes of BPO catalst       $ 16.50

Cost without shipping $947.68 I suspect that $1,000.00 is a pretty good estimate. Then there may be another 5 gallon bucket and catalyst about $200.00. Pretty expensive but if it is a life-long repair it should be worth the cost.

This brings up a question about weight. The shipping weight on all of that stuff is 185lbs. I imagine you can add about ten more pounds for the gla$$ to recap the stringers. Almost 200lbs total.

I consider extra weight to be counter productive to producing soft slalom wakes. How much heavier is this system compared to the traditional stringer replacement?
Bill
http://www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks
www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks 1987 SN Rebuild Project
Back to Top
Nautique Mike View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: June-20-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 147
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautique Mike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2006 at 4:39pm
Guys-

Sorry, it must have been 1 1/2 5 gallon buckets per main stringer, because I bought 5 total and used one per secondary.

As far as the weight is concerned try weighing the soggy wood you pull out of your current boat. I pulled 2 1/2 big trash cans worth out of the boat and they weighed a ton. The waterlogged foam I pulled out was also a huge amount of weight as well. I think it was 8 commercial size trash bags worth and they were not lite.

It's hard to say if my restored boat will be exactly the weight of an original "DRY" 78'SN, but it will be a ton lighter and more dependable than my old "WET" 78'. So because of this I am acually looking foward to a faster more responsive boat in the spring! Dry= Faster! Sweet!!

Food for thought...

If you want to compare apples to apples look up the weight of Old Growth Douglas Fir which was the original material and do the math. I think you would be surprised that the weight is going to be very close to the Seacast product. Old Growth Fir is pretty heavy as it has a high sap content.

I myself am not that concerned with the minor weight difference as I'm going to load the boat full of 30 packs before I go out anyways.

Back to my sanding...
NM
Nautique Mike
Back to Top
SkiBum View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: November-17-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SkiBum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-18-2006 at 5:32pm
Great job on your boat. I really mean it. I bet you shed several hundred pounds of soupy wood and foam. That should pay great dividends in performance. It is much less of a head ache to pour self-leveling compound than to trim wood to fit. Plenty of advantages to using Seacast.

As for the 30 packs...that is far too much weight for me.

Bill
http://www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks
www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks 1987 SN Rebuild Project
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2006 at 9:02am
OK -My "doubting Thomas" self is starting to come around. I think I'll do it. With my own recipe of epoxy resin ,a pinch of LP-3 for ductility and ground gla$$ - kevlar matrix.
The lag bolts will have to go though. The resin system just won't stand up to the shear forces they will see in a 180s. And I will do 180s. When a wood stringer yeilds it rots over time, a resin system fails catastroficly. So I'm thinking about fabing up some stainless/steel brackets with nuts tig welded to them and encapsulating them in the poured stringer.    
Back to Top
hasbeenskier View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: May-23-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1116
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hasbeenskier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2006 at 1:11pm
My thoughts would be to build an aluminum cradle like 1980 S.N.'s and after. So you can through bolt the cradle to the stringers and then bolt the engine to the cradle.
bj
hasbeenskier
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-19-2006 at 3:26pm
I've got real problems sinking lag bolts into the resin. The ceramic matrix filler is just trapped(suspended ) in the resin. They are not tied together like fiber. Composite materials get there strength from the solid matrix part(gla$$,kevlar.carbon,boron ect..) and the resin holds it in the desired shape.There are epoxy thread repair systems for "cosmetic" repairs that work for a single striped out thread hole,but won't stand-up to the torque of the origanal thread.But;this system is designed for an engine to be thrugh bolted at the transom sandwitching it with a nut, washer & bolt. The only way to connect the engine & trans mounts to the composite stringer is with an encapsulated bracket. The resin lag bolt interface will fail, not if ,when.
Back to Top
Nautique Mike View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: June-20-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 147
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautique Mike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-20-2006 at 6:54am
Guys-

The Seacast material comes with long gla$$ fibers to mix into the concoction. Do you think that changes your oppinion on using lags?

Also, Seacast does not mention anything about using a through bolt technique only. Do other manufactures (Ajay) mention it?

Lastly if it is an issue... How about this idea? I have already poured my stringers so what if I drill two 3/4" holes perpendiciular through the stringers 3" below the mount holes. Then I can fabricate two 3/4" stainless rods to insert into the stringers.

These SS rods will have threaded holes to correspond to the bolt locations and then I can use threaded SS bolts to go through the regular mounts, pa$$ through 3" of Seacast and then through the side of the threaded SS rod.

The idea is like Ikea uses on there modular furniture but in a much more robust fashion.

Whould it work? Would you change any of the dimentions or configurations?

Thanks for the ideas and encouragement!
NM
Nautique Mike
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-20-2006 at 9:28am
N/M

I like your idea,it will tie the mounts to the stringer in a horazontal plane.
Maybe use the 3/4 S/S rod 4 inch lenghts or so ,drill & tap one end about 1 1/2 or 2 inches deep. Drill a 3/4 dia. hole in the stringer top so the rod is flush with the top of the stringer. Cross drill the stringer & rod , pin it with 1/4 pins.Use 3M 5200 to bond the whole mount in place.
If anyone is going to use lag bolts,they could be cross drilled and pinned through the lag bolts , maybe two 1/8 solid pins per bolt 1 1/2 inchs apart, but that will permantly set the lag bolts in the stringer.
Back to Top
Nautique Mike View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: June-20-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 147
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nautique Mike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-20-2006 at 2:09pm
H20 Dog-

I am acually thinking of CROSS DRILLING the stringer 3" from the top W/ a 3/4" hole going from one side of the stringer to the other.

Then inserting a 3/4" SS rod through that hole. The rod ends will be seen on either side of the stringer when your done.

Now looking down @ the stringer top, drill down 3" + with a clearance hole (for a 3/8-16 threaded bolt)till you hit the side of the 3/4" rod.

Then drill and tap on the side of rod and go right through.

With this configuration force is distributed more evenly with the 3/4" rod, rather than a thin pin.

Also,for it to rip out the whole fibergla$$ woving from both sides of the stringer plus the 3" of Seacast would have to come with it. If you wanted to make it permanant then you could gla$$ over the ends and hide the rod ends to give the bilge that cla$$ic look.

If you don't gla$$ them in than it will be
possible to remove them if the threads ever strip down the road. Just remove the 3/8-16 bolts which hold the mount and tap the rod out with a hammer.

What do you think?
Thanks-
NM
Nautique Mike
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21183
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-20-2006 at 2:34pm
NM, perhaps it would be better (and easier) to build an aluminum cradle like hasbeenskier suggested?
Back to Top
Waterdog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-27-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2020
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Waterdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-20-2006 at 3:34pm
N/M
     That's a good idea - Any type of encapsulated nut / retainer is better than a theaded hole in resin . If you can temp mount the S/S rod and mark it from the top, remove it, drill ,tap, then reinstall. A couple hours it,s done.
      Man by the time we get to mine it should be gold plated !
                         See Ya             
Back to Top
25XS View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: October-31-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 25XS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-25-2006 at 8:31pm
As usual: Been there, done that.

Here is another company with a section dedicated to "pourable stringer & transom replacement".

http://www.seawolfindustries.com/seacast.html

Very nice and have used it on raceboats with up to 50hp motors and speeds to 85+mph with not failures and no sign of weakness. Downpoint in the case of racing is that it's twice the weight of wood transoms.

Tom
"Stock Stuff" by day... Racing Mercury outboards on the weekends.
1991 Nautique Excel "thousands" of hours...
Back to Top
SkiBum View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: November-17-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SkiBum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-26-2006 at 9:02am
Originally posted by 25XS 25XS wrote:

Downpoint ... is that it's twice the weight of wood transoms.


I thought that might be the case.
Bill
http://www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks
www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks 1987 SN Rebuild Project
Back to Top
Yak3 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: March-10-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 50
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yak3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-30-2006 at 12:00am
hasbeenskier,

any dimensions for that aluminum cradle you suggested?
Back to Top
hasbeenskier View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: May-23-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1116
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hasbeenskier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-30-2006 at 7:10am
Yak, I can get the dimensions for you. It will take me several days to get the time to get to it. What year boat do you want use it on? The reason I ask is that I have seen them for sale on this site. Seems to me 79Nautique had one. It may have sold. You might post a request for one. In any event I will get the measurements as quickly as posible. bj
hasbeenskier
Back to Top
Yak3 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: March-10-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 50
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Yak3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-30-2006 at 9:55am
I have a 79 CC w/ a 302 Commander. I was just curious what the thickness of the aluminum was.

Thanks
Back to Top
SkiBum View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: November-17-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SkiBum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November-30-2006 at 8:22pm
It's 1/8" thick on my 87SN.
Bill
http://www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks
www.freewebs.com/billsboatworks 1987 SN Rebuild Project
Back to Top
Jesse View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: May-24-2014
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jesse Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-24-2014 at 7:56pm
Well how did the arjay and seacast stringers hold up? Do you still have your boats? are the stringers still solid? Did anyone add extra support for the engine mounts?

I still need to rip my floor and all up but I am hoping to be able to pour new stringers. I can get polyester resin for like $50-75 for 5 gallons locally and I have a giant box of fiberglass mainly 6oz E glass. I would use the is it 1708 or whatever glass is suppose to be used and epoxy for re-glassing the caps and any extra support. From my understanding epoxy has a 20% better bonding ability and bonds really well to polyester resin, opposed to polyester resin which does not bond well to epoxy.

Would love to hear the end out come and I sure others would as well.
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May-24-2014 at 9:58pm
Well I think hasbeenskier went a different route with I believe cooska and nautique mike has not been on since '11 I think his boat folded up and he went down with the ship---------
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page    <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC